These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

495 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24330750)

  • 1. Can audiometric results predict qualitative hearing improvements in bone-anchored hearing aid recipients?
    McNeil ML; Gulliver M; Morris DP; Makki FM; Bance M
    J Laryngol Otol; 2014 Jan; 128(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 24330750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bone-anchored Hearing Aids: correlation between pure-tone thresholds and outcome in three user groups.
    Pfiffner F; Kompis M; Stieger C
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Oct; 30(7):884-90. PubMed ID: 19730146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Preliminary functional results and quality of life after implantation of a new bone conduction hearing device in patients with conductive and mixed hearing loss.
    Ihler F; Volbers L; Blum J; Matthias C; Canis M
    Otol Neurotol; 2014 Feb; 35(2):211-5. PubMed ID: 24448279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quality of life improvement for bone-anchored hearing aid users and their partners.
    McNeil ML; Gulliver M; Morris DP; Bance M
    J Laryngol Otol; 2011 Jun; 125(6):554-60. PubMed ID: 21443817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparisons of sound processors based on osseointegrated implants in patients with conductive or mixed hearing loss.
    Pfiffner F; Caversaccio MD; Kompis M
    Otol Neurotol; 2011 Jul; 32(5):728-35. PubMed ID: 21646934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Audiological and subjective benefit results in bone-anchored hearing device users.
    Boleas-Aguirre MS; Bulnes Plano MD; de Erenchun Lasa IR; Ibáñez Beroiz B
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jun; 33(4):494-503. PubMed ID: 22472615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Better performance with bone-anchored hearing aid than acoustic devices in patients with severe air-bone gap.
    de Wolf MJ; Hendrix S; Cremers CW; Snik AF
    Laryngoscope; 2011 Mar; 121(3):613-6. PubMed ID: 21344443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Objective and subjective results of the Bonebridge transcutaneous active direct-drive bone conduction hearing implant.
    Alzhrani F
    Saudi Med J; 2019 Aug; 40(8):797-801. PubMed ID: 31423516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bone-anchored hearing aid system application for unilateral congenital conductive hearing impairment: audiometric results.
    Kunst SJ; Leijendeckers JM; Mylanus EA; Hol MK; Snik AF; Cremers CW
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Jan; 29(1):2-7. PubMed ID: 18199951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The bone conduction implant: Clinical results of the first six patients.
    Reinfeldt S; Håkansson B; Taghavi H; Fredén Jansson KJ; Eeg-Olofsson M
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Jun; 54(6):408-16. PubMed ID: 25705995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Benefit of a new hearing device utilizing cartilage conduction.
    Nishimura T; Hosoi H; Saito O; Miyamae R; Shimokura R; Matsui T; Iwakura T
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2013 Oct; 40(5):440-6. PubMed ID: 23395550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Outcome prediction for Bonebridge candidates based on audiological indication criteria.
    Wimmer W; von Werdt M; Mantokoudis G; Anschuetz L; Kompis M; Caversaccio M
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2019 Oct; 46(5):681-686. PubMed ID: 30635142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Audiological and clinical outcomes of a transcutaneous bone conduction hearing implant: Six-month results from a multicentre study.
    den Besten CA; Monksfield P; Bosman A; Skarzynski PH; Green K; Runge C; Wigren S; Blechert JI; Flynn MC; Mylanus EAM; Hol MKS
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2019 Mar; 44(2):144-157. PubMed ID: 30358920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The bone-anchored hearing aid in the rehabilitation of single-sided deafness: experience with 58 patients.
    Martin TP; Lowther R; Cooper H; Holder RL; Irving RM; Reid AP; Proops DW
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2010 Aug; 35(4):284-90. PubMed ID: 20738337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does the bone-anchored hearing aid have a complementary effect on audiological and subjective outcomes in patients with unilateral conductive hearing loss?
    Hol MK; Snik AF; Mylanus EA; Cremers CW
    Audiol Neurootol; 2005; 10(3):159-68. PubMed ID: 15724087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Long-term results of bone-anchored hearing aid recipients who had previously used air-conduction hearing aids.
    Hol MK; Snik AF; Mylanus EA; Cremers CW
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2005 Apr; 131(4):321-5. PubMed ID: 15837900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparative study of hearing aids and round window application of the vibrant sound bridge (VSB) for patients with mixed or conductive hearing loss.
    Marino R; Linton N; Eikelboom RH; Statham E; Rajan GP
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Apr; 52(4):209-18. PubMed ID: 23527900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of a new powerful bone-anchored hearing system: a comparison study.
    Bosman AJ; Snik AF; Hol MK; Mylanus EA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Jun; 24(6):505-13. PubMed ID: 23886427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Audiological results with Baha in conductive and mixed hearing loss.
    Pfiffner F; Caversaccio MD; Kompis M
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2011; 71():73-83. PubMed ID: 21389707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hearing performance with 2 different high-power sound processors for osseointegrated auditory implants.
    Kurz A; Caversaccio M; Kompis M
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Jun; 34(4):604-10. PubMed ID: 23652327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.