1727 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24331565)
1. Hydroxyapatite and collagen combination-coated dental implants display better bone formation in the peri-implant area than the same combination plus bone morphogenetic protein-2-coated implants, hydroxyapatite only coated implants, and uncoated implants.
Lee SW; Hahn BD; Kang TY; Lee MJ; Choi JY; Kim MK; Kim SG
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Jan; 72(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 24331565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Hydroxyapatite and silk combination-coated dental implants result in superior bone formation in the peri-implant area compared with hydroxyapatite and collagen combination-coated implants.
Kweon H; Lee SW; Hahn BD; Lee YC; Kim SG
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Oct; 72(10):1928-36. PubMed ID: 25234528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In vivo comparison of bone formation on titanium implant surfaces coated with biomimetically deposited calcium phosphate or electrochemically deposited hydroxyapatite.
Yang GL; He FM; Song E; Hu JA; Wang XX; Zhao SF
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(4):669-80. PubMed ID: 20657861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Aerosol deposition of hydroxyapatite and 4-hexylresorcinol coatings on titanium alloys for dental implants.
Kim SG; Hahn BD; Park DS; Lee YC; Choi EJ; Chae WS; Baek DH; Choi JY
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Nov; 69(11):e354-63. PubMed ID: 21821331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Early bone healing around 2 different experimental, HA grit-blasted, and dual acid-etched titanium implant surfaces. A pilot study in rabbits.
Gobbato L; Arguello E; Martin IS; Hawley CE; Griffin TJ
Implant Dent; 2012 Dec; 21(6):454-60. PubMed ID: 23149502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative analysis of osseointegration of titanium implants with acid-etched surfaces and different biomolecular coatings.
Mueller CK; Thorwarth M; Schmidt M; Schlegel KA; Schultze-Mosgau S
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Dec; 112(6):726-36. PubMed ID: 21441047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Increased bone formation around coated implants.
Stadlinger B; Bierbaum S; Grimmer S; Schulz MC; Kuhlisch E; Scharnweber D; Eckelt U; Mai R
J Clin Periodontol; 2009 Aug; 36(8):698-704. PubMed ID: 19531092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of hydroxyapatite nanocrystals on early bone formation surrounding dental implants.
Svanborg LM; Hoffman M; Andersson M; Currie F; Kjellin P; Wennerberg A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 40(3):308-15. PubMed ID: 21111575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of electrochemically deposited nanohydroxyapatite on bone bonding of sandblasted/dual acid-etched titanium implant.
He F; Yang G; Wang X; Zhao S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):790-9. PubMed ID: 19865618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biological performance of chemical hydroxyapatite coating associated with implant surface modification by laser beam: biomechanical study in rabbit tibias.
Faeda RS; Tavares HS; Sartori R; Guastaldi AC; Marcantonio E
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1706-15. PubMed ID: 19615586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The role of titanium implant surface modification with hydroxyapatite nanoparticles in progressive early bone-implant fixation in vivo.
Lin A; Wang CJ; Kelly J; Gubbi P; Nishimura I
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):808-16. PubMed ID: 19865620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomimetic calcium phosphate composite coating of dental implants.
Schliephake H; Scharnweber D; Roesseler S; Dard M; Sewing A; Aref A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):738-46. PubMed ID: 17066635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bone response to the multilayer BMP-2 gene coated porous titanium implant surface.
Jiang QH; Liu L; Peel S; Yang GL; Zhao SF; He FM
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24(8):853-61. PubMed ID: 22168601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical comparison of different surface modifications for dental implants.
Ferguson SJ; Langhoff JD; Voelter K; von Rechenberg B; Scharnweber D; Bierbaum S; Schnabelrauch M; Kautz AR; Frauchiger VM; Mueller TL; van Lenthe GH; Schlottig F
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(6):1037-46. PubMed ID: 19216272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of a cell adhesion molecule coating on the blasted surface of titanium implants on bone healing in the rabbit femur.
Park JW; Lee SG; Choi BJ; Suh JY
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(4):533-41. PubMed ID: 17929513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Osseointegration of anodized titanium implants coated with poly(lactide-co-glycolide)/basic fibroblast growth factor by electrospray.
Lee SY; Koak JY; Heo SJ; Kim SK; Lee SJ; Nam SY
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(2):315-20. PubMed ID: 20369090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Histomorphometric analysis of hydroxyapatite-coated implants in rabbit cortical bone using longitudinal and transverse histologic sections.
Rebollal J; Soares Gde A; Vidigal GM
Implant Dent; 2010 Apr; 19(2):137-44. PubMed ID: 20386217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of H2O2/HCl heat treatment of implants on in vivo peri-implant bone formation.
Yang GL; He FM; Zhao SS; Wang XX; Zhao SF
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(6):1020-8. PubMed ID: 19216270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Surface and biomechanical study of titanium implants modified by laser with and without hydroxyapatite coating, in rabbits.
Sisti KE; de Rossi R; Antoniolli AM; Aydos RD; Guastaldi AC; Queiroz TP; Garcia IR; Piattelli A; Tavares HS
J Oral Implantol; 2012 Jun; 38(3):231-7. PubMed ID: 20690851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Trabecular bone response to titanium implants with a thin carbonate-containing apatite coating applied using the molecular precursor method.
Hayakawa T; Takahashi K; Yoshinari M; Okada H; Yamamoto H; Sato M; Nemoto K
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(6):851-8. PubMed ID: 17190294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
