176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24331850)
1. Change in masticatory ability with the implant restoration of second molars.
Nam DH; Lee DW; Chung CJ; Kim KH; Park KH; Moon IS
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Apr; 111(4):286-92. PubMed ID: 24331850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Functional aspects of treatment with implant-supported single crowns: a quality control study in subjects with tooth agenesis.
Goshima K; Lexner MO; Thomsen CE; Miura H; Gotfredsen K; Bakke M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Jan; 21(1):108-14. PubMed ID: 19845708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of implant-supported prosthesis on the bite force and masticatory efficiency in subjects with shortened dental arches.
Meena A; Jain V; Singh N; Arora N; Jha R
J Oral Rehabil; 2014 Feb; 41(2):87-92. PubMed ID: 24372288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Differences in masticatory function in patients with endodontically treated teeth and single-implant-supported prostheses: a pilot study.
Woodmansey KF; Ayik M; Buschang PH; White CA; He J
J Endod; 2009 Jan; 35(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 19084116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of implant diameter, restoration design, and occlusal table variations on screw loosening of posterior single-tooth implant restorations.
Bakaeen LG; Winkler S; Neff PA
J Oral Implantol; 2001; 27(2):63-72. PubMed ID: 12498429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Restoration of occlusal and proximal contacts by a single molar crown improves the smoothness of the masticatory movement.
Watamoto T; Egusa H; Mizumori T; Yashiro K; Takada K; Yatani H
J Dent; 2008 Dec; 36(12):984-92. PubMed ID: 18790556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Multiple single-tooth implant restorations in the posterior jaws: maintenance of marginal bone levels with reference to the implant-abutment microgap.
Norton MR
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):777-84. PubMed ID: 17066640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Masticatory performance, maximum occlusal force, and occlusal contact area in patients with bilaterally missing molars and distal extension removable partial dentures.
Aras K; Hasanreisoğlu U; Shinogaya T
Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(2):204-9. PubMed ID: 19418870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Rehabilitating Missing Mandibular First Molars with Implant- or Tooth-Supported Prostheses Using Masticatory Efficiency and Patient Satisfaction Outcomes.
Kumar Y; Chand P; Arora V; Singh SV; Mishra N; Alvi HA; Verma UP
J Prosthodont; 2017 Jul; 26(5):376-380. PubMed ID: 26588357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A short-term clinical evaluation of immediately restored maxillary TiOblast single-tooth implants.
Norton MR
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(2):274-81. PubMed ID: 15101600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Single molar replacement with a progressive thread design implant system: a retrospective clinical report.
Romanos GE; Nentwig GH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(6):831-6. PubMed ID: 11151582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Esthetic outcome of implant-supported single-tooth replacements assessed by the patient and by prosthodontists.
Chang M; Odman PA; Wennström JL; Andersson B
Int J Prosthodont; 1999; 12(4):335-41. PubMed ID: 10635203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cemented versus screw-retained implant-supported single-tooth crowns: a 4-year prospective clinical study.
Vigolo P; Givani A; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(2):260-5. PubMed ID: 15101598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Patients' expectations of and satisfaction with implant-supported fixed partial dentures and single crowns.
de Lima EA; dos Santos MB; Marchini L
Int J Prosthodont; 2012; 25(5):484-90. PubMed ID: 22930771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical evaluation of the incidence of prosthetic complications in implant crowns constructed with UCLA castable abutments. A cohort follow-up study.
Montero J; Manzano G; Beltrán D; Lynch CD; Suárez-García MJ; Castillo-Oyagüe R
J Dent; 2012 Dec; 40(12):1081-9. PubMed ID: 22982530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Masticatory function and patient satisfaction with implant-supported mandibular overdentures: a prospective 5-year study.
Bakke M; Holm B; Gotfredsen K
Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(6):575-81. PubMed ID: 12475165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Photoelastic analysis of stresses transmitted by universal cast to long abutment on implant-supported single restorations under static occlusal loads.
Aguiar FA; Tiossi R; Macedo AP; Mattos Mda G; Ribeiro RF; Rodrigues RC
J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Nov; 23(7 Suppl 1):2019-23. PubMed ID: 23154374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Zirconia abutments for single-tooth implant restorations: a retrospective and clinical follow-up study.
Ekfeldt A; Fürst B; Carlsson GE
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Nov; 22(11):1308-14. PubMed ID: 21382085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the amount of excess cement around the margins of cement-retained dental implant restorations: the effect of the cement application method.
Chee WW; Duncan J; Afshar M; Moshaverinia A
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):216-21. PubMed ID: 23566601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical evaluation of tooth- and implant-supported fixed dental prostheses with various nonrigid connector positions: a finite element analysis.
Burak Özcelik T; Ersoy E; Yilmaz B
J Prosthodont; 2011 Jan; 20(1):16-28. PubMed ID: 21251117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
