These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24332396)

  • 1. Incorporating uncertainty regarding applicability of evidence from meta-analyses into clinical decision making.
    Kriston L; Meister R
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Mar; 67(3):325-34. PubMed ID: 24332396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Indirect treatment comparison/network meta-analysis study questionnaire to assess relevance and credibility to inform health care decision making: an ISPOR-AMCP-NPC Good Practice Task Force report.
    Jansen JP; Trikalinos T; Cappelleri JC; Daw J; Andes S; Eldessouki R; Salanti G
    Value Health; 2014 Mar; 17(2):157-73. PubMed ID: 24636374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evidence-based practice: how to perform and use systematic reviews for clinical decision-making.
    Kranke P
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2010 Sep; 27(9):763-72. PubMed ID: 20523217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Methods to calculate uncertainty in the estimated overall effect size from a random-effects meta-analysis.
    Veroniki AA; Jackson D; Bender R; Kuss O; Langan D; Higgins JPT; Knapp G; Salanti G
    Res Synth Methods; 2019 Mar; 10(1):23-43. PubMed ID: 30129707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Interpreting indirect treatment comparisons and network meta-analysis for health-care decision making: report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: part 1.
    Jansen JP; Fleurence R; Devine B; Itzler R; Barrett A; Hawkins N; Lee K; Boersma C; Annemans L; Cappelleri JC
    Value Health; 2011 Jun; 14(4):417-28. PubMed ID: 21669366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Bayesian framework to account for uncertainty due to missing binary outcome data in pairwise meta-analysis.
    Turner NL; Dias S; Ades AE; Welton NJ
    Stat Med; 2015 May; 34(12):2062-80. PubMed ID: 25809313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evidence synthesis for decision making 6: embedding evidence synthesis in probabilistic cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Dias S; Sutton AJ; Welton NJ; Ades AE
    Med Decis Making; 2013 Jul; 33(5):671-8. PubMed ID: 23804510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pro: Meta-analysis: the case for.
    Mudge DW; Webster AC; Johnson DW
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2016 Jun; 31(6):875-80. PubMed ID: 27217392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Decision analytical economic modelling within a Bayesian framework: application to prophylactic antibiotics use for caesarean section.
    Cooper NJ; Sutton AJ; Abrams KR
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2002 Dec; 11(6):491-512. PubMed ID: 12516986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The role of external evidence in data monitoring of a clinical trial.
    Pocock SJ
    Stat Med; 1996 Jun; 15(12):1285-93; discussion 1295-7. PubMed ID: 8817802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Shared decision-making in the context of menopausal health: where do we stand?
    Légaré F; Brouillette MH
    Maturitas; 2009 Jul; 63(3):169-75. PubMed ID: 19272720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Systematic reviews and meta-analysis in rheumatology: a gentle introduction for clinicians.
    Kelley GA; Kelley KS
    Clin Rheumatol; 2019 Aug; 38(8):2029-2038. PubMed ID: 31102085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Incorporating uncertainty into medical decision making: an approach to unexpected test results.
    Bianchi MT; Alexander BM; Cash SS
    Med Decis Making; 2009; 29(1):116-24. PubMed ID: 18812583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The potential for meta-analysis to support decision analysis in ecology.
    Mengersen K; MacNeil MA; Caley MJ
    Res Synth Methods; 2015 Jun; 6(2):111-21. PubMed ID: 26099478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A meta schema for evidence information in clinical practice guidelines as a basis for decision-making.
    Kaiser K; Martini P; Miksch S; Oztürk A
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2007; 129(Pt 2):925-9. PubMed ID: 17911851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Meta-analysis: a practical decision making tool for surgeons.
    Panesar SS; Bhandari M; Darzi A; Athanasiou T
    Int J Surg; 2009 Aug; 7(4):291-6. PubMed ID: 19464394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dynamic meta-analysis: a method of using global evidence for local decision making.
    Shackelford GE; Martin PA; Hood ASC; Christie AP; Kulinskaya E; Sutherland WJ
    BMC Biol; 2021 Feb; 19(1):33. PubMed ID: 33596922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Decision making for risk management: a comparison of graphical methods for presenting quantitative uncertainty.
    Edwards JA; Snyder FJ; Allen PM; Makinson KA; Hamby DM
    Risk Anal; 2012 Dec; 32(12):2055-70. PubMed ID: 22616656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A novel method to use fuzzy soft sets in decision making based on ambiguity measure and Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence: An application in medical diagnosis.
    Wang J; Hu Y; Xiao F; Deng X; Deng Y
    Artif Intell Med; 2016 May; 69():1-11. PubMed ID: 27235800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.