These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24332396)

  • 21. A novel method to use fuzzy soft sets in decision making based on ambiguity measure and Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence: An application in medical diagnosis.
    Wang J; Hu Y; Xiao F; Deng X; Deng Y
    Artif Intell Med; 2016 May; 69():1-11. PubMed ID: 27235800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Incorporating direct and indirect evidence using bayesian methods: an applied case study in ovarian cancer.
    Griffin S; Bojke L; Main C; Palmer S
    Value Health; 2006; 9(2):123-31. PubMed ID: 16626416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. An evolutionary Bayesian belief network methodology for participatory decision making under uncertainty: an application to groundwater management.
    Farmani R; Henriksen HJ; Savic D; Butler D
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2012 Jul; 8(3):456-61. PubMed ID: 21412969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Weighing Clinical Evidence Using Patient Preferences: An Application of Probabilistic Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis.
    Broekhuizen H; IJzerman MJ; Hauber AB; Groothuis-Oudshoorn CGM
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2017 Mar; 35(3):259-269. PubMed ID: 27832461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The experience of adults who choose watchful waiting or active surveillance as an approach to medical treatment: a qualitative systematic review.
    Rittenmeyer L; Huffman D; Alagna M; Moore E
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2016 Feb; 14(2):174-255. PubMed ID: 27536798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. When is enough evidence enough? - Using systematic decision analysis and value-of-information analysis to determine the need for further evidence.
    Siebert U; Rochau U; Claxton K
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2013; 107(9-10):575-84. PubMed ID: 24315327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Estimating a test's accuracy using tailored meta-analysis-How setting-specific data may aid study selection.
    Willis BH; Hyde CJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 May; 67(5):538-46. PubMed ID: 24447592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Con: Meta-analysis: some key limitations and potential solutions.
    Esterhuizen TM; Thabane L
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2016 Jun; 31(6):882-5. PubMed ID: 27217394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Shared decision making in endocrinology: present and future directions.
    Rodriguez-Gutierrez R; Gionfriddo MR; Ospina NS; Maraka S; Tamhane S; Montori VM; Brito JP
    Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol; 2016 Aug; 4(8):706-716. PubMed ID: 26915314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Using decision thresholds for ranking treatments in network meta-analysis results in more informative rankings.
    Brignardello-Petersen R; Johnston BC; Jadad AR; Tomlinson G
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Jun; 98():62-69. PubMed ID: 29454030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Uncertainty and computational complexity.
    Bossaerts P; Yadav N; Murawski C
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2019 Feb; 374(1766):20180138. PubMed ID: 30966921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Meta-analysis in the design and monitoring of clinical trials.
    DerSimonian R
    Stat Med; 1996 Jun; 15(12):1237-48; discussion 1249-52. PubMed ID: 8817798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Improving Intelligence Analysis With Decision Science.
    Dhami MK; Mandel DR; Mellers BA; Tetlock PE
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2015 Nov; 10(6):753-7. PubMed ID: 26581731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Two approaches to incorporate clinical data uncertainty into multiple criteria decision analysis for benefit-risk assessment of medicinal products.
    Wen S; Zhang L; Yang B
    Value Health; 2014 Jul; 17(5):619-28. PubMed ID: 25128056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Communicating statin evidence to support shared decision-making.
    Barrett B; Ricco J; Wallace M; Kiefer D; Rakel D
    BMC Fam Pract; 2016 Apr; 17():41. PubMed ID: 27048421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Diagnostic accuracy meta-analysis: review of an important tool in radiological research and decision making.
    Jones CM; Athanasiou T
    Br J Radiol; 2009 Jun; 82(978):441-6. PubMed ID: 19451313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The Irrelevance of the Risk-Uncertainty Distinction.
    Roser D
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2017 Oct; 23(5):1387-1407. PubMed ID: 28597223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Clinical decision-making: systematic reviews and meta-analysis].
    Fernández Pérez C
    Neurologia; 2003 Mar; 18(2):70-3. PubMed ID: 12610756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evidence synthesis for decision making 3: heterogeneity--subgroups, meta-regression, bias, and bias-adjustment.
    Dias S; Sutton AJ; Welton NJ; Ades AE
    Med Decis Making; 2013 Jul; 33(5):618-40. PubMed ID: 23804507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evidence-based decision-making 2: Systematic reviews and meta-analysis.
    Bello A; Wiebe N; Garg A; Tonelli M
    Methods Mol Biol; 2015; 1281():397-416. PubMed ID: 25694324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.