130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24332750)
1. Determinants of pain perception after external cephalic version in pregnant women.
Truijens SE; van der Zalm M; Pop VJ; Kuppens SM
Midwifery; 2014 Mar; 30(3):e102-7. PubMed ID: 24332750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Fewer caesarean sections for breech presentation following external cephalic version according to a protocol in a special office visit].
Kuppens SM; Hasaart TH; van der Donk MW; Huibers M; Franssen MJ; de Becker BM; Wijnen HA; Pop VJ
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Jun; 152(23):1323-8. PubMed ID: 18661859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fear for external cephalic version and depression: predictors of successful external cephalic version for breech presentation at term?
Ciliacus E; van der Zalm M; Truijens SE; Hasaart TH; Pop VJ; Kuppens SM
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2014 Mar; 14():101. PubMed ID: 24620740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Factors affecting the success of moxibustion in the management of a breech presentation as a preliminary treatment to external cephalic version.
Manyande A; Grabowska C
Midwifery; 2009 Dec; 25(6):774-80. PubMed ID: 19853333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A retrospective study of the success, safety and effectiveness of external cephalic version without tocolysis in a specialised midwifery centre in the Netherlands.
Rijnders M; Herschderfer K; Prins M; van Baaren R; van Veelen AJ; Schönbeck Y; Buitendijk S
Midwifery; 2008 Mar; 24(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 17196716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Facilitators and barriers to external cephalic version for breech presentation at term among health care providers in the Netherlands: a quantitative analysis.
Rosman AN; Vlemmix F; Beuckens A; Rijnders ME; Opmeer BC; Mol BW; Kok M; Fleuren MA
Midwifery; 2014 Mar; 30(3):e145-50. PubMed ID: 24530121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mode of childbirth and neonatal outcome after external cephalic version: A prospective cohort study.
Rosman AN; Vlemmix F; Ensing S; Opmeer BC; Te Hoven S; Velzel J; de Hundt M; van den Berg S; Rota H; van der Post JA; Mol BW; Kok M
Midwifery; 2016 Aug; 39():44-8. PubMed ID: 27321719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Patients' and professionals' barriers and facilitators to external cephalic version for breech presentation at term, a qualitative analysis in the Netherlands.
Rosman AN; Vlemmix F; Fleuren MA; Rijnders ME; Beuckens A; Opmeer BC; Mol BW; van Zwieten MC; Kok M
Midwifery; 2014 Mar; 30(3):324-30. PubMed ID: 23664312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [External cephalic version in case of persisting breech presentation at term: motivations and women's experience of the intervention].
Pichon M; Guittier MJ; Irion O; Boulvain M
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2013; 41(7-8):427-32. PubMed ID: 23102577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Maternal experience of pain during external cephalic version at term.
Fok WY; Chan LW; Leung TY; Lau TK
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2005 Aug; 84(8):748-51. PubMed ID: 16026399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An observational study of the success and complications of 2546 external cephalic versions in low-risk pregnant women performed by trained midwives.
Beuckens A; Rijnders M; Verburgt-Doeleman GH; Rijninks-van Driel GC; Thorpe J; Hutton EK
BJOG; 2016 Feb; 123(3):415-23. PubMed ID: 25639281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pregnant women's preferences and knowledge of term breech management, in an Australian setting.
Raynes-Greenow CH; Roberts CL; Barratt A; Brodrick B; Peat B
Midwifery; 2004 Jun; 20(2):181-7. PubMed ID: 15177862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Implementation of external cephalic version in the Netherlands: a retrospective cohort study.
Vlemmix F; Rosman AN; te Hoven S; van de Berg S; Fleuren MA; Rijnders ME; Beuckens A; Opmeer BC; Mol BW; Kok M
Birth; 2014 Dec; 41(4):323-9. PubMed ID: 25288341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Fewer breech deliveries after implementation of a modified cephalic version protocol].
Kuppens SM; Francois AM; Hasaart TH; van der Donk MW; Pop VJ
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2010; 154():A63. PubMed ID: 20132565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Predictors of success of external cephalic version and cephalic presentation at birth among 1253 women with non-cephalic presentation using logistic regression and classification tree analyses.
Hutton EK; Simioni JC; Thabane L
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2017 Aug; 96(8):1012-1020. PubMed ID: 28449212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. External cephalic version for breech presentation at term: predictors of success, and impact on the rate of caesarean section.
Hussin OA; Mahmoud MA; Abdel-Fattah MM
East Mediterr Health J; 2013 Feb; 19(2):162-6. PubMed ID: 23516827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. This baby is not for turning: Women's experiences of attempted external cephalic version.
Watts NP; Petrovska K; Bisits A; Catling C; Homer CS
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2016 Aug; 16(1):248. PubMed ID: 27561416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Predictors for a successful external cephalic version: a single centre experience.
Ebner F; Friedl TW; Leinert E; Schramm A; Reister F; Lato K; Janni W; DeGregorio N
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2016 Apr; 293(4):749-55. PubMed ID: 26437955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Tocolysis for repeat external cephalic version in breech presentation at term: a randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial.
Impey L; Pandit M
BJOG; 2005 May; 112(5):627-31. PubMed ID: 15842288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [External cephalic version after 36th week of gestationAnalysis of women´s perspective].
Wágnerová K; Hruban L; Janků P
Ceska Gynekol; 2017; 82(5):355-361. PubMed ID: 29020782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
