These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24332894)

  • 1. Design parameters and the material coupling are decisive for the micromotion magnitude at the stem-neck interface of bi-modular hip implants.
    Jauch SY; Huber G; Haschke H; Sellenschloh K; Morlock MM
    Med Eng Phys; 2014 Mar; 36(3):300-7. PubMed ID: 24332894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of material coupling and assembly condition on the magnitude of micromotion at the stem-neck interface of a modular hip endoprosthesis.
    Jauch SY; Huber G; Hoenig E; Baxmann M; Grupp TM; Morlock MM
    J Biomech; 2011 Jun; 44(9):1747-51. PubMed ID: 21531416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Micromotions at the taper interface between stem and neck adapter of a bimodular hip prosthesis during activities of daily living.
    Jauch SY; Huber G; Sellenschloh K; Haschke H; Baxmann M; Grupp TM; Morlock MM
    J Orthop Res; 2013 Aug; 31(8):1165-71. PubMed ID: 23553890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assembly force and taper angle difference influence the relative motion at the stem-neck interface of bi-modular hip prostheses.
    Haschke H; Jauch-Matt SY; Sellenschloh K; Huber G; Morlock MM
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2016 Jul; 230(7):690-9. PubMed ID: 27170535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Determination of local micromotion at the stem-neck taper junction of a bi-modular total hip prosthesis design.
    Falkenberg A; Drummen P; Morlock MM; Huber G
    Med Eng Phys; 2019 Mar; 65():31-38. PubMed ID: 30679024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The influence of contact conditions and micromotions on the fretting behavior of modular titanium alloy taper connections.
    Baxmann M; Jauch SY; Schilling C; Blömer W; Grupp TM; Morlock MM
    Med Eng Phys; 2013 May; 35(5):676-83; discussion 676. PubMed ID: 22940445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Characterization of the fretting corrosion behavior, surface and debris from head-taper interface of two different modular hip prostheses.
    Dos Santos CT; Barbosa C; Monteiro MJ; Abud IC; Caminha IMV; Roesler CRM
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Sep; 62():71-82. PubMed ID: 27179766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Noncemented total hip arthroplasty: influence of extramedullary parameters on initial implant stability and on bone-implant interface stresses].
    Ramaniraka NA; Rakotomanana LR; Rubin PJ; Leyvraz P
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Oct; 86(6):590-7. PubMed ID: 11060433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of flexural rigidity on micromotion at the head-stem taper interface of modular hip prostheses.
    Haschke H; Konow T; Huber G; Morlock MM
    Med Eng Phys; 2019 Jun; 68():1-10. PubMed ID: 30981609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of taper design and loading on taper micromotion.
    Diaz-Lopez RA; Wen PH; Shelton JC
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2022 Apr; 128():105106. PubMed ID: 35139433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Geometric element analysis of fretting in a model of a modular femoral component of a hip implant.
    Lewis G
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2004; 14(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 14757952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Decomposition of micromotion at the head-neck interface in total hip arthroplasty during walking.
    Zhang G; Yang S; Cui W; Huang Z; Zhang X; Zhang Y; Li J; Jin Z
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2023 Apr; 26(5):548-558. PubMed ID: 35549565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biomechanical evaluation of two types of short-stemmed hip prostheses compared to the trust plate prosthesis by three-dimensional measurement of micromotions.
    Fottner A; Schmid M; Birkenmaier C; Mazoochian F; Plitz W; Volkmar J
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Jun; 24(5):429-34. PubMed ID: 19307048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fretting crevice corrosion of stainless steel stem-CoCr femoral head connections: comparisons of materials, initial moisture, and offset length.
    Gilbert JL; Mehta M; Pinder B
    J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2009 Jan; 88(1):162-73. PubMed ID: 18613095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Finite element wear prediction using adaptive meshing at the modular taper interface of hip implants.
    Bitter T; Khan I; Marriott T; Lovelady E; Verdonschot N; Janssen D
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2018 Jan; 77():616-623. PubMed ID: 29100204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fretting corrosion accelerates crevice corrosion of modular hip tapers.
    Brown SA; Flemming CA; Kawalec JS; Placko HE; Vassaux C; Merritt K; Payer JH; Kraay MJ
    J Appl Biomater; 1995; 6(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 7703534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The taper corrosion pattern observed for one bi-modular stem design is related to geometry-determined taper mechanics.
    Buente D; Bryant M; Ward M; Neville A; Morlock M; Huber G
    Med Eng Phys; 2017 Aug; 46():79-88. PubMed ID: 28647286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An analysis of the head-neck taper interface in retrieved hip prostheses.
    Lieberman JR; Rimnac CM; Garvin KL; Klein RW; Salvati EA
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1994 Mar; (300):162-7. PubMed ID: 8131330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biomechanical evaluation of different offset versions of a cementless hip prosthesis by 3-dimensional measurement of micromotions.
    Fottner A; Peter CV; Schmidutz F; Wanke-Jellinek L; Schröder C; Mazoochian F; Jansson V
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2011 Oct; 26(8):830-5. PubMed ID: 21536357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A finite element study on the mechanical response of the head-neck interface of hip implants under realistic forces and moments of daily activities: Part 2.
    Fallahnezhad K; Farhoudi H; Oskouei RH; Taylor M
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2018 Jan; 77():164-170. PubMed ID: 28918008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.