235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24333298)
1. Anthropogenic noise affects vocal interactions.
McMullen H; Schmidt R; Kunc HP
Behav Processes; 2014 Mar; 103():125-8. PubMed ID: 24333298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Daytime noise predicts nocturnal singing in urban robins.
Fuller RA; Warren PH; Gaston KJ
Biol Lett; 2007 Aug; 3(4):368-70. PubMed ID: 17456449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Anthropogenic noise affects song structure in red-winged blackbirds (Agelaius phoeniceus).
Hanna D; Blouin-Demers G; Wilson DR; Mennill DJ
J Exp Biol; 2011 Nov; 214(Pt 21):3549-56. PubMed ID: 21993783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Signal complexity communicates aggressive intent during contests, but the process is disrupted by noise.
Kareklas K; Wilson J; Kunc HP; Arnott G
Biol Lett; 2019 Apr; 15(4):20180841. PubMed ID: 30991914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dominant frequency of songs in tropical bird species is higher in sites with high noise pollution.
Tolentino VCM; Baesse CQ; Melo C
Environ Pollut; 2018 Apr; 235():983-992. PubMed ID: 29751402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Birds and anthropogenic noise: are urban songs adaptive?
Nemeth E; Brumm H
Am Nat; 2010 Oct; 176(4):465-75. PubMed ID: 20712517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Timing vocal behaviour: experimental evidence for song overlap avoidance in Eurasian wrens.
Yang XJ; Ma XR; Slabbekoorn H
Behav Processes; 2014 Mar; 103():84-90. PubMed ID: 24309317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The impact of anthropogenic noise on individual identification via female song in Black-capped chickadees (Poecile atricapillus).
Montenegro C; Service WD; Scully EN; Mischler SK; Sahu PK; Benowicz TJ; Fox KVR; Sturdy CB
Sci Rep; 2021 Sep; 11(1):17530. PubMed ID: 34475418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bird song and anthropogenic noise: vocal constraints may explain why birds sing higher-frequency songs in cities.
Nemeth E; Pieretti N; Zollinger SA; Geberzahn N; Partecke J; Miranda AC; Brumm H
Proc Biol Sci; 2013 Mar; 280(1754):20122798. PubMed ID: 23303546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Seasonality and social factors, but not noise pollution, influence the song characteristics of two leaf warbler species.
Deoniziak K; Osiejuk TS
PLoS One; 2021; 16(9):e0257074. PubMed ID: 34473797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Eastern Bluebirds Alter their Song in Response to Anthropogenic Changes in the Acoustic Environment.
Kight CR; Swaddle JP
Integr Comp Biol; 2015 Sep; 55(3):418-31. PubMed ID: 26116201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Memory-dependent adjustment of vocal response latencies in a territorial songbird.
Geberzahn N; Hultsch H; Todt D
J Physiol Paris; 2013 Jun; 107(3):203-9. PubMed ID: 22677884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of heterospecific and conspecific vibrational signal overlap and signal-to-noise ratio on male responsiveness in Nezara viridula (L.).
de Groot M; Cokl A; Virant-Doberlet M
J Exp Biol; 2010 Sep; 213(Pt 18):3213-22. PubMed ID: 20802124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of urban noise on song and response behaviour in great tits.
Mockford EJ; Marshall RC
Proc Biol Sci; 2009 Aug; 276(1669):2979-85. PubMed ID: 19493902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Producing song: the vocal apparatus.
Suthers RA; Zollinger SA
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2004 Jun; 1016():109-29. PubMed ID: 15313772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Traffic noise drowns out great tit alarm calls.
Templeton CN; Zollinger SA; Brumm H
Curr Biol; 2016 Nov; 26(22):R1173-R1174. PubMed ID: 27875691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Songbird cheaters pay a retaliation cost: evidence for auditory conventional signals.
Molles LE; Vehrencamp SL
Proc Biol Sci; 2001 Oct; 268(1480):2013-9. PubMed ID: 11571048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Acoustic adaptation to city noise through vocal learning by a songbird.
Moseley DL; Derryberry GE; Phillips JN; Danner JE; Danner RM; Luther DA; Derryberry EP
Proc Biol Sci; 2018 Oct; 285(1888):. PubMed ID: 30305435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Causes and consequences of song amplitude adjustment in a territorial bird: a case study in nightingales.
Brumm H
An Acad Bras Cienc; 2004 Jun; 76(2):289-95. PubMed ID: 15258642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The sender-receiver matching hypothesis: support from the peripheral coding of acoustic features in songbirds.
Gall MD; Brierley LE; Lucas JR
J Exp Biol; 2012 Nov; 215(Pt 21):3742-51. PubMed ID: 22855616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
