724 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24333459)
1. Comparison of complications, costs, and length of stay of three different lumbar interbody fusion techniques: an analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database.
Goz V; Weinreb JH; Schwab F; Lafage V; Errico TJ
Spine J; 2014 Sep; 14(9):2019-27. PubMed ID: 24333459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of lumbar interbody fusion surgery on postoperative outcomes in patients with recurrent lumbar disc herniation: Analysis of the US national inpatient sample.
Ye YP; Hu JW; Zhang YG; Xu H
J Clin Neurosci; 2019 Dec; 70():20-26. PubMed ID: 31630917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: An Analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample Database.
Norton RP; Bianco K; Klifto C; Errico TJ; Bendo JA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Aug; 40(15):1219-27. PubMed ID: 26020842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Stand-alone Anterior Lumbar Interbody, Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody, and Anterior/Posterior Fusion: Analysis of Fusion Outcomes and Costs.
Bozzio AE; Johnson CR; Fattor JA; Kleck CJ; Patel VV; Burger EL; Noshchenko A; Cain CMJ
Orthopedics; 2018 Sep; 41(5):e655-e662. PubMed ID: 30011051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Comparison of Anterior and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusions: Complications, Readmissions, Discharge Dispositions, and Costs.
Qureshi R; Puvanesarajah V; Jain A; Shimer AL; Shen FH; Hassanzadeh H
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2017 Dec; 42(24):1865-1870. PubMed ID: 28549000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fusion technique does not affect short-term patient-reported outcomes for lumbar degenerative disease.
Divi SN; Schroeder GD; Goyal DKC; Radcliff KE; Galetta MS; Hilibrand AS; Anderson DG; Kurd MF; Rihn JA; Kaye ID; Woods BR; Vaccaro AR; Kepler CK
Spine J; 2019 Dec; 19(12):1960-1968. PubMed ID: 31356987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Utility of multilevel lateral interbody fusion of the thoracolumbar coronal curve apex in adult deformity surgery in combination with open posterior instrumentation and L5-S1 interbody fusion: a case-matched evaluation of 32 patients.
Theologis AA; Mundis GM; Nguyen S; Okonkwo DO; Mummaneni PV; Smith JS; Shaffrey CI; Fessler R; Bess S; Schwab F; Diebo BG; Burton D; Hart R; Deviren V; Ames C;
J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Feb; 26(2):208-219. PubMed ID: 27767682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Transforaminal interbody fusion versus anterior-posterior interbody fusion of the lumbar spine: a financial analysis.
Whitecloud TS; Roesch WW; Ricciardi JE
J Spinal Disord; 2001 Apr; 14(2):100-3. PubMed ID: 11285420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Circumferential fusion: a comparative analysis between anterior lumbar interbody fusion with posterior pedicle screw fixation and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for L5-S1 isthmic spondylolisthesis.
Tye EY; Tanenbaum JE; Alonso AS; Xiao R; Steinmetz MP; Mroz TE; Savage JW
Spine J; 2018 Mar; 18(3):464-471. PubMed ID: 28821444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Does approach matter? A comparative radiographic analysis of spinopelvic parameters in single-level lumbar fusion.
Ahlquist S; Park HY; Gatto J; Shamie AN; Park DY
Spine J; 2018 Nov; 18(11):1999-2008. PubMed ID: 29631061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Longitudinal Trends of Patient Demographics and Morbidity of Different Approaches in Lumbar Interbody Fusion: An Analysis Using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database.
Oezel L; Okano I; Hughes AP; Sarin M; Shue J; Sama AA; Cammisa FP; Girardi FP; Soffin EM
World Neurosurg; 2022 Aug; 164():e183-e193. PubMed ID: 35472646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A perioperative cost analysis comparing single-level minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
Singh K; Nandyala SV; Marquez-Lara A; Fineberg SJ; Oglesby M; Pelton MA; Andersson GB; Isayeva D; Jegier BJ; Phillips FM
Spine J; 2014 Aug; 14(8):1694-701. PubMed ID: 24252237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Approach-based Comparative and Predictor Analysis of 30-day Readmission, Reoperation, and Morbidity in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using the ACS-NSQIP Dataset.
Katz AD; Mancini N; Karukonda T; Greenwood M; Cote M; Moss IL
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Mar; 44(6):432-441. PubMed ID: 30138253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A protocol of a randomized controlled multicenter trial for surgical treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis: the Lumbar Interbody Fusion Trial (LIFT).
de Kunder SL; Rijkers K; van Kuijk SM; Evers SM; de Bie RA; van Santbrink H
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2016 Oct; 17(1):417. PubMed ID: 27716168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Transforaminal versus anterior lumbar interbody fusion in long deformity constructs: a matched cohort analysis.
Dorward IG; Lenke LG; Bridwell KH; OʼLeary PT; Stoker GE; Pahys JM; Kang MM; Sides BA; Koester LA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 May; 38(12):E755-62. PubMed ID: 23442780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Single-Level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion versus Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Posterior Instrumentation at L5/S1.
Jacob KC; Patel MR; Ribot MA; Parsons AW; Vanjani NN; Pawlowski H; Prabhu MC; Singh K
World Neurosurg; 2022 Jan; 157():e111-e122. PubMed ID: 34610449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus anterior lumbar interbody fusion as an adjunct to posterior instrumented correction of degenerative lumbar scoliosis: three year clinical and radiographic outcomes.
Crandall DG; Revella J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Sep; 34(20):2126-33. PubMed ID: 19752698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Outcomes of anterior vs. posterior approach to single-level lumbar spinal fusion with interbody device: An analysis of the nationwide inpatient sample.
De Stefano F; Haddad H; Mayo T; Nouman M; Fiani B
Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2022 Jan; 212():107061. PubMed ID: 34863055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative analysis of perioperative surgical site infection after minimally invasive versus open posterior/transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: analysis of hospital billing and discharge data from 5170 patients.
McGirt MJ; Parker SL; Lerner J; Engelhart L; Knight T; Wang MY
J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Jun; 14(6):771-8. PubMed ID: 21417699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The cost-effectiveness of interbody fusions versus posterolateral fusions in 137 patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis.
Bydon M; Macki M; Abt NB; Witham TF; Wolinsky JP; Gokaslan ZL; Bydon A; Sciubba DM
Spine J; 2015 Mar; 15(3):492-8. PubMed ID: 25463402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
