451 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24333515)
1. Improving detection of clinically significant prostate cancer: magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound fusion guided prostate biopsy.
Rastinehad AR; Turkbey B; Salami SS; Yaskiv O; George AK; Fakhoury M; Beecher K; Vira MA; Kavoussi LR; Siegel DN; Villani R; Ben-Levi E
J Urol; 2014 Jun; 191(6):1749-54. PubMed ID: 24333515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy Improves but Does Not Replace Standard Template Biopsy for the Detection of Prostate Cancer.
Hanna N; Wszolek MF; Mojtahed A; Nicaise E; Wu B; Gelpi-Hammerschmidt FJ; Salari K; Dahl DM; Blute ML; Harisinghani M; Feldman AS
J Urol; 2019 Nov; 202(5):944-951. PubMed ID: 31144593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound fusion biopsy detect prostate cancer in patients with prior negative transrectal ultrasound biopsies.
Vourganti S; Rastinehad A; Yerram N; Nix J; Volkin D; Hoang A; Turkbey B; Gupta GN; Kruecker J; Linehan WM; Choyke PL; Wood BJ; Pinto PA
J Urol; 2012 Dec; 188(6):2152-2157. PubMed ID: 23083875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Words of wisdom. Re: Improving detection of clinically significant prostate cancer: MRI/TRUS fusion-guided prostate biopsy.
Villers A
Eur Urol; 2014 Jun; 65(6):1218-9. PubMed ID: 24774825
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound-fusion biopsy significantly upgrades prostate cancer versus systematic 12-core transrectal ultrasound biopsy.
Siddiqui MM; Rais-Bahrami S; Truong H; Stamatakis L; Vourganti S; Nix J; Hoang AN; Walton-Diaz A; Shuch B; Weintraub M; Kruecker J; Amalou H; Turkbey B; Merino MJ; Choyke PL; Wood BJ; Pinto PA
Eur Urol; 2013 Nov; 64(5):713-719. PubMed ID: 23787357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Re: Improving detection of clinically significant prostate cancer: magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound fusion guided prostate biopsy: A. R. Rastinehad, B. Turkbey, S. S. Salami, O. Yaskiv, A. K. George, M. Fakhoury, K. Beecher, M. A. Vira, L. R. Kavoussi, D. N. Siegel, R. Villani and E. Ben-Levi. J Urol 2014; 191: 1749-1754.
Patodia M; Goel A; Kumar M
J Urol; 2014 Dec; 192(6):1888; discussion 1888-9. PubMed ID: 25194541
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Critical evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging targeted, transrectal ultrasound guided transperineal fusion biopsy for detection of prostate cancer.
Kuru TH; Roethke MC; Seidenader J; Simpfendörfer T; Boxler S; Alammar K; Rieker P; Popeneciu VI; Roth W; Pahernik S; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
J Urol; 2013 Oct; 190(4):1380-6. PubMed ID: 23608676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prospective evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging guided in-bore prostate biopsy versus systematic transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy in biopsy naïve men with elevated prostate specific antigen.
Quentin M; Blondin D; Arsov C; Schimmöller L; Hiester A; Godehardt E; Albers P; Antoch G; Rabenalt R
J Urol; 2014 Nov; 192(5):1374-9. PubMed ID: 24866597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Risk of Prostate Cancer after a Negative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Guided Biopsy.
Kinnaird A; Sharma V; Chuang R; Priester A; Tran E; Barsa DE; Delfin M; Kwan L; Sisk A; Felker E; Marks LS
J Urol; 2020 Dec; 204(6):1180-1186. PubMed ID: 32614257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prebiopsy Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis in Biopsy-naive Men with Suspected Prostate Cancer Based on Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen Values: Results from a Randomized Prospective Blinded Controlled Trial.
Tonttila PP; Lantto J; Pääkkö E; Piippo U; Kauppila S; Lammentausta E; Ohtonen P; Vaarala MH
Eur Urol; 2016 Mar; 69(3):419-25. PubMed ID: 26033153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Anterior Localization of Prostate Cancer Suspicious Lesions in 1,161 Patients Undergoing Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Guided Targeted Biopsies.
Leyh-Bannurah SR; Kachanov M; Beyersdorff D; Preisser F; Tilki D; Fisch M; Graefen M; Budäus L
J Urol; 2018 Nov; 200(5):1035-1040. PubMed ID: 29935274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of Initial Experience with Transrectal Magnetic Resonance Imaging Cognitive Guided Micro-Ultrasound Biopsies versus Established Transperineal Robotic Ultrasound Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fusion Biopsies for Prostate Cancer.
Claros OR; Tourinho-Barbosa RR; Fregeville A; Gallardo AC; Muttin F; Carneiro A; Stabile A; Moschini M; Macek P; Cathala N; Mombet A; Sanchez-Salas R; Cathelineau X
J Urol; 2020 May; 203(5):918-925. PubMed ID: 31821099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of Transperineal Targeted Prostate Biopsies, Visual Estimation and Image Fusion in Men Needing Repeat Biopsy in the PICTURE Trial.
Simmons LAM; Kanthabalan A; Arya M; Briggs T; Barratt D; Charman SC; Freeman A; Hawkes D; Hu Y; Jameson C; McCartan N; Moore CM; Punwani S; van der Muelen J; Emberton M; Ahmed HU
J Urol; 2018 Dec; 200(6):1227-1234. PubMed ID: 30017964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Optimizing the Number of Cores Targeted During Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fusion Target Biopsy.
Kenigsberg AP; Renson A; Rosenkrantz AB; Huang R; Wysock JS; Taneja SS; Bjurlin MA
Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Oct; 1(5):418-425. PubMed ID: 31158081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of real-time magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound fusion image-guided transperineal target biopsy with needle tracking with a mechanical position-encoded stepper in detecting significant prostate cancer in biopsy-naïve men.
Shoji S; Hiraiwa S; Ogawa T; Kawakami M; Nakano M; Hashida K; Sato Y; Hasebe T; Uchida T; Tajiri T
Int J Urol; 2017 Apr; 24(4):288-294. PubMed ID: 28222486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion guided prostate biopsy improves cancer detection following transrectal ultrasound biopsy and correlates with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging.
Pinto PA; Chung PH; Rastinehad AR; Baccala AA; Kruecker J; Benjamin CJ; Xu S; Yan P; Kadoury S; Chua C; Locklin JK; Turkbey B; Shih JH; Gates SP; Buckner C; Bratslavsky G; Linehan WM; Glossop ND; Choyke PL; Wood BJ
J Urol; 2011 Oct; 186(4):1281-5. PubMed ID: 21849184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Primary magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasonography fusion-guided biopsy of the prostate.
Maxeiner A; Kittner B; Blobel C; Wiemer L; Hofbauer SL; Fischer T; Asbach P; Haas M; Penzkofer T; Fuller F; Miller K; Cash H
BJU Int; 2018 Aug; 122(2):211-218. PubMed ID: 29569320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prospective randomized trial comparing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided in-bore biopsy to MRI-ultrasound fusion and transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy in patients with prior negative biopsies.
Arsov C; Rabenalt R; Blondin D; Quentin M; Hiester A; Godehardt E; Gabbert HE; Becker N; Antoch G; Albers P; Schimmöller L
Eur Urol; 2015 Oct; 68(4):713-20. PubMed ID: 26116294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of Lesion Visibility on Transrectal Ultrasound on the Prediction of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer (Gleason Score 3 + 4 or Greater) with Transrectal Ultrasound-Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fusion Biopsy.
Garcia-Reyes K; Nguyen HG; Zagoria RJ; Shinohara K; Carroll PR; Behr SC; Westphalen AC
J Urol; 2018 Mar; 199(3):699-705. PubMed ID: 28941918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. How Many Targeted Biopsy Cores are Needed for Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection during Transperineal Magnetic Resonance Imaging Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy?
Song G; Ruan M; Wang H; Fan Y; He Q; Lin Z; Li X; Li P; Wang X; He Z; Zhou L
J Urol; 2020 Dec; 204(6):1202-1208. PubMed ID: 32716686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
