These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

392 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24333710)

  • 1. Adsorptive removal of phenolic compounds using cellulose acetate phthalate-alumina nanoparticle mixed matrix membrane.
    Mukherjee R; De S
    J Hazard Mater; 2014 Jan; 265():8-19. PubMed ID: 24333710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Use of cellulose acetate/polyphenylsulfone derivatives to fabricate ultrafiltration hollow fiber membranes for the removal of arsenic from drinking water.
    Kumar M; RaoT S; Isloor AM; Ibrahim GPS; Inamuddin ; Ismail N; Ismail AF; Asiri AM
    Int J Biol Macromol; 2019 May; 129():715-727. PubMed ID: 30738161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of the removal of hydrophobic trace organic contaminants by forward osmosis and reverse osmosis.
    Xie M; Nghiem LD; Price WE; Elimelech M
    Water Res; 2012 May; 46(8):2683-92. PubMed ID: 22402269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Studies on the effect of humic acids and phenol on adsorption-ultrafiltration process performance.
    Mozia S; Tomaszewska M; Morawski AW
    Water Res; 2005; 39(2-3):501-9. PubMed ID: 15644259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Removal of chromium (VI) ions from aqueous solutions using amine-impregnated TiO
    Gebru KA; Das C
    Chemosphere; 2018 Jan; 191():673-684. PubMed ID: 29078191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Micellar enhanced ultrafiltration of phenolic derivatives from their mixtures.
    Purkait MK; DasGupta S; De S
    J Colloid Interface Sci; 2005 May; 285(1):395-402. PubMed ID: 15797438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Investigation on the reaction of phenolic pollutions to mono-rhamnolipid micelles using MEUF.
    Liu Z; Yu M; Zeng G; Li M; Zhang J; Zhong H; Liu Y; Shao B; Li Z; Wang Z; Liu G; Yang X
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2017 Jan; 24(2):1230-1240. PubMed ID: 27770324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Removal of bisphenol A (BPA) from water by various nanofiltration (NF) and reverse osmosis (RO) membranes.
    Yüksel S; Kabay N; Yüksel M
    J Hazard Mater; 2013 Dec; 263 Pt 2():307-10. PubMed ID: 23731784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Study on phosphate removal and recovery by activated alumina].
    Meng WN; Xie J; Wu DY; Zhang ZJ; Kong HN
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2013 Jan; 34(1):231-6. PubMed ID: 23487944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Adsorptive membrane separation for eco-friendly decontamination of chlorpyrifos via biochar-impregnated cellulose acetate mixed matrix membrane.
    Jacob MM; Ponnuchamy M; Kapoor A; Sivaraman P
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2024 Sep; 31(44):56314-56331. PubMed ID: 39271613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Behaviour of RO98pHt polyamide membrane in reverse osmosis and low reverse osmosis conditions for phenol removal.
    Hidalgo AM; León G; Gómez M; Murcia MD; Gómez E; Gómez JL
    Environ Technol; 2011 Oct; 32(13-14):1497-502. PubMed ID: 22329140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Nanoporous membranes with cellulose nanocrystals as functional entity in chitosan: removal of dyes from water.
    Karim Z; Mathew AP; Grahn M; Mouzon J; Oksman K
    Carbohydr Polym; 2014 Nov; 112():668-76. PubMed ID: 25129796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Arsenic remediation from drinking water by synthesized nano-alumina dispersed in chitosan-grafted polyacrylamide.
    Saha S; Sarkar P
    J Hazard Mater; 2012 Aug; 227-228():68-78. PubMed ID: 22647233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Removal of soluble organics from water by a hybrid process of clay adsorption and membrane filtration.
    Lin SH; Hsiao RC; Juang RS
    J Hazard Mater; 2006 Jul; 135(1-3):134-40. PubMed ID: 16359788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ion implantation: effect on flux and rejection properties of NF membranes.
    Abitoye JO; Mukherjee JP; Jones K
    Environ Sci Technol; 2005 Sep; 39(17):6487-93. PubMed ID: 16190203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Factors affecting the rejection of organic solutes during NF/RO treatment--a literature review.
    Bellona C; Drewes JE; Xu P; Amy G
    Water Res; 2004 Jul; 38(12):2795-809. PubMed ID: 15223273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. High-performance cellulose acetate/polysulfone blend ultrafiltration membranes for removal of heavy metals from water.
    Moradihamedani P; Abdullah AH
    Water Sci Technol; 2017 May; 75(10):2422-2433. PubMed ID: 28541950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of nano-porous alumina membranes for hemodialysis application.
    Attaluri AC; Huang Z; Belwalkar A; Van Geertruyden W; Gao D; Misiolek W
    ASAIO J; 2009; 55(3):217-23. PubMed ID: 19293709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fabrication and characterization of iron oxide ceramic membranes for arsenic removal.
    Sabbatini P; Yrazu F; Rossi F; Thern G; Marajofsky A; Fidalgo de Cortalezzi MM
    Water Res; 2010 Nov; 44(19):5702-12. PubMed ID: 20599241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Defluoridation from aqueous solutions by nano-alumina: characterization and sorption studies.
    Kumar E; Bhatnagar A; Kumar U; Sillanpää M
    J Hazard Mater; 2011 Feb; 186(2-3):1042-9. PubMed ID: 21177029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.