280 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24333929)
1. The effects of noise vocoding on speech quality perception.
Anderson MC; Arehart KH; Kates JM
Hear Res; 2014 Mar; 309():75-83. PubMed ID: 24333929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of fluctuating maskers for speech recognition tests.
Francart T; van Wieringen A; Wouters J
Int J Audiol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):2-13. PubMed ID: 21091261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An adaptive clinical test of temporal resolution: age effects.
Lister JJ; Roberts RA; Lister FL
Int J Audiol; 2011 Jun; 50(6):367-74. PubMed ID: 21299377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A correlational method to concurrently measure envelope and temporal fine structure weights: effects of age, cochlear pathology, and spectral shaping.
Fogerty D; Humes LE
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1679-89. PubMed ID: 22978896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of spectral smearing and temporal fine structure degradation on speech masking release.
Gnansia D; Péan V; Meyer B; Lorenzi C
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jun; 125(6):4023-33. PubMed ID: 19507983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Measuring spectral and temporal resolution simultaneously: a comparison between two tests.
van Esch TE; Dreschler WA
Int J Audiol; 2011 Jul; 50(7):477-90. PubMed ID: 21506893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Syllable-constituent perception by hearing-aid users: Common factors in quiet and noise.
Miller JD; Watson CS; Leek MR; Dubno JR; Wark DJ; Souza PE; Gordon-Salant S; Ahlstrom JB
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Apr; 141(4):2933. PubMed ID: 28464618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Relative contributions of acoustic temporal fine structure and envelope cues for lexical tone perception in noise.
Qi B; Mao Y; Liu J; Liu B; Xu L
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 May; 141(5):3022. PubMed ID: 28599529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effects of the addition of low-level, low-noise noise on the intelligibility of sentences processed to remove temporal envelope information.
Hopkins K; Moore BC; Stone MA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Oct; 128(4):2150-61. PubMed ID: 20968385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Relations between frequency selectivity, temporal fine-structure processing, and speech reception in impaired hearing.
Strelcyk O; Dau T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3328-45. PubMed ID: 19425674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An algorithm to improve speech recognition in noise for hearing-impaired listeners.
Healy EW; Yoho SE; Wang Y; Wang D
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Oct; 134(4):3029-38. PubMed ID: 24116438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of slow-acting wide dynamic range compression on measures of intelligibility and ratings of speech quality in simulated-loss listeners.
Rosengard PS; Payton KL; Braida LD
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Jun; 48(3):702-14. PubMed ID: 16197282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Spectro-temporal envelope changes caused by temporal fine structure modification.
Kates JM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jun; 129(6):3981-90. PubMed ID: 21682419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Perception of temporally modified speech in auditory neuropathy.
Hassan DM
Int J Audiol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 21047293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Danish hearing in noise test.
Nielsen JB; Dau T
Int J Audiol; 2011 Mar; 50(3):202-8. PubMed ID: 21319937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of noise, nonlinear processing, and linear filtering on perceived speech quality.
Arehart KH; Kates JM; Anderson MC
Ear Hear; 2010 Jun; 31(3):420-36. PubMed ID: 20440116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of moderate cochlear hearing loss on the ability to benefit from temporal fine structure information in speech.
Hopkins K; Moore BC; Stone MA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):1140-53. PubMed ID: 18247914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Temporal resolution in regions of normal hearing and speech perception in noise for adults with sloping high-frequency hearing loss.
Feng Y; Yin S; Kiefte M; Wang J
Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):115-25. PubMed ID: 19816181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of masker modulation depth on speech masking release.
Gnansia D; Jourdes V; Lorenzi C
Hear Res; 2008 May; 239(1-2):60-8. PubMed ID: 18434049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Benefits of Acoustic Beamforming for Solving the Cocktail Party Problem.
Kidd G; Mason CR; Best V; Swaminathan J
Trends Hear; 2015 Jun; 19():. PubMed ID: 26126896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
