293 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24334481)
1. Effects of coil orientation on the electric field induced by TMS over the hand motor area.
Laakso I; Hirata A; Ugawa Y
Phys Med Biol; 2014 Jan; 59(1):203-18. PubMed ID: 24334481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The coil orientation dependency of the electric field induced by TMS for M1 and other brain areas.
Janssen AM; Oostendorp TF; Stegeman DF
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2015 May; 12():47. PubMed ID: 25981522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Atlas of optimal coil orientation and position for TMS: A computational study.
Gomez-Tames J; Hamasaka A; Laakso I; Hirata A; Ugawa Y
Brain Stimul; 2018; 11(4):839-848. PubMed ID: 29699821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Physiological observations validate finite element models for estimating subject-specific electric field distributions induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human motor cortex.
Opitz A; Legon W; Rowlands A; Bickel WK; Paulus W; Tyler WJ
Neuroimage; 2013 Nov; 81():253-264. PubMed ID: 23644000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Computational and experimental analysis of TMS-induced electric field vectors critical to neuronal activation.
Krieg TD; Salinas FS; Narayana S; Fox PT; Mogul DJ
J Neural Eng; 2015 Aug; 12(4):046014. PubMed ID: 26052136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Where does TMS Stimulate the Motor Cortex? Combining Electrophysiological Measurements and Realistic Field Estimates to Reveal the Affected Cortex Position.
Bungert A; Antunes A; Espenhahn S; Thielscher A
Cereb Cortex; 2017 Nov; 27(11):5083-5094. PubMed ID: 27664963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of "standard" and "navigated" procedures of TMS coil positioning over motor, premotor and prefrontal targets in patients with chronic pain and depression.
Ahdab R; Ayache SS; Brugières P; Goujon C; Lefaucheur JP
Neurophysiol Clin; 2010 Mar; 40(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 20230933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Where and what TMS activates: Experiments and modeling.
Laakso I; Murakami T; Hirata A; Ugawa Y
Brain Stimul; 2018; 11(1):166-174. PubMed ID: 29030110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fast multigrid-based computation of the induced electric field for transcranial magnetic stimulation.
Laakso I; Hirata A
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Dec; 57(23):7753-65. PubMed ID: 23128377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of head and coil modeling for the calculation of induced electric field during transcranial magnetic stimulation.
Tachas NJ; Samaras T
Int J Psychophysiol; 2014 Jul; 93(1):167-71. PubMed ID: 23872490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation and computed electric field strength reduce stimulator-dependent differences in the motor threshold.
Danner N; Julkunen P; Könönen M; Säisänen L; Nurkkala J; Karhu J
J Neurosci Methods; 2008 Sep; 174(1):116-22. PubMed ID: 18662721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Predicting the hotspot location and motor threshold prior to transcranial magnetic stimulation using electric field modelling.
Matilainen N; Kataja J; Laakso I
Phys Med Biol; 2023 Dec; 69(1):. PubMed ID: 37816371
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of the gyral geometry on the electric field induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation.
Thielscher A; Opitz A; Windhoff M
Neuroimage; 2011 Jan; 54(1):234-43. PubMed ID: 20682353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Magnetic stimuli applied over motor and visual cortex: influence of coil position and field polarity on motor responses, phosphenes, and eye movements.
Meyer BU; Diehl R; Steinmetz H; Britton TC; Benecke R
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl; 1991; 43():121-34. PubMed ID: 1773752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Using increased structural detail of the cortex to improve the accuracy of modeling the effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation on neocortical activation.
Chen M; Mogul DJ
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2010 May; 57(5):1216-26. PubMed ID: 20142156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Linking physics with physiology in TMS: a sphere field model to determine the cortical stimulation site in TMS.
Thielscher A; Kammer T
Neuroimage; 2002 Nov; 17(3):1117-30. PubMed ID: 12414254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. New coil positioning method for interleaved transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)/functional MRI (fMRI) and its validation in a motor cortex study.
Moisa M; Pohmann R; Ewald L; Thielscher A
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Jan; 29(1):189-97. PubMed ID: 19097080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of coil placement and orientation on the assessment of focal excitability in motor mapping with navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation.
Reijonen J; Säisänen L; Könönen M; Mohammadi A; Julkunen P
J Neurosci Methods; 2020 Feb; 331():108521. PubMed ID: 31733284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. TMS intensity and focality correlation with coil orientation at three non-motor regions.
Gomez-Feria J; Fernandez-Corazza M; Martin-Rodriguez JF; Mir P
Phys Med Biol; 2022 Feb; 67(5):. PubMed ID: 35081513
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Significance of coil orientation for motor evoked potentials from nasalis muscle elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation.
Dubach P; Guggisberg AG; Rösler KM; Hess CW; Mathis J
Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Apr; 115(4):862-70. PubMed ID: 15003767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
