214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24335093)
1. Correlation discrepancies between high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a cytological/histological correlation study from a single-institution experience.
Zhang M; Carrozza M; Huang Y
Acta Cytol; 2014; 58(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 24335093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnosis of Cervical Precancers by Endocervical Curettage at Colposcopy of Women With Abnormal Cervical Cytology.
Liu AH; Walker J; Gage JC; Gold MA; Zuna R; Dunn ST; Schiffman M; Wentzensen N
Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Dec; 130(6):1218-1225. PubMed ID: 29112672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic value of endocervical curettage for detecting dysplastic lesions in women with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) and low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) Papanicolaou smears.
Poomtavorn Y; Suwannarurk K; Thaweekul Y; Maireang K
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(8):3461-4. PubMed ID: 24870740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Risk of High-Grade Histopathology Diagnosed by Cervical Conization in Endocervical Curettage Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia 1: A Case-Control Study.
Cong Q; Xiao J; Tao X; Sui L
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2020 Jul; 24(3):247-251. PubMed ID: 32324695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Follow-up findings in young females with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion papanicolaou test results.
Zhao C; Kalposi-Novak P; Austin RM
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2011 Mar; 135(3):361-4. PubMed ID: 21366461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Pregnancy related cervical cytological changes and clinical management].
Ma L; Bian ML; Liu J; Wang XH; Pang CH; Chen Y
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Feb; 46(2):84-7. PubMed ID: 21426763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Human papillomavirus detection by PCR assay in a large series of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions with cytohistological correlation and follow-up.
Lerma Puertas E; Otal Salaverri C; Ríos Martín JJ; Sánchez Gómez A; Jiménez Caraballo A; González-Cámpora R
Acta Cytol; 2011; 55(5):426-32. PubMed ID: 21986169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion/cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL-H) is a unique category of cytologic abnormality associated with distinctive HPV and histopathologic CIN 2+ detection rates.
Barron S; Li Z; Austin RM; Zhao C
Am J Clin Pathol; 2014 Feb; 141(2):239-46. PubMed ID: 24436272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Patients with negative cervical biopsies after papanicolaou test interpretations of "atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion": comparative longitudinal follow-up.
Huitron S; Bonvicino A; Fadare O
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2008 Jun; 12(3):187-90. PubMed ID: 18486894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Diagnostic value of multiply biopsies and endocervical curettage on cervical lesions].
Zhang L; Du H; Zhang W; Yang B; Wang C; Belinson JL; Wu R
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Apr; 50(4):263-7. PubMed ID: 26080937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Results of pap smears and immunocytochemical detection of the p16 and Ki67 proteins in women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cervical cancer].
Rokita W; Skawiński D; Zmelonek-Znamirowska A; Kedzia W; Karowicz-Bilińska A; Spaczyński R; Spaczyński M
Ginekol Pol; 2012 Nov; 83(11):822-6. PubMed ID: 23379189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Significance of subclassifying high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions into moderate dysplasia/CIN II versus severe dysplasia/CIN III/CIS in the Bethesda System terminology.
Howell LP; Zhou H; Wu W; Davis R
Diagn Cytopathol; 2004 May; 30(5):362-6. PubMed ID: 15108239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Clinical significance of atypical squamous cells and low grade squamous intraepithelial lesions in cervical smear].
Liu J; Song XH; Wang QX
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Jul; 87(25):1764-6. PubMed ID: 17919385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Expression of MN/CA9 protein in Papanicolaou smears containing atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance is a diagnostic biomarker of cervical dysplasia and neoplasia.
Liao SY; Stanbridge EJ
Cancer; 2000 Mar; 88(5):1108-21. PubMed ID: 10699902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical importance of "low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL-H)" terminology for cervical smears 5-year analysis of the positive predictive value of LSIL-H compared with ASC-H, LSIL, and HSIL in the detection of high-grade cervical lesions with a review of the literature.
Ince U; Aydin O; Peker O
Gynecol Oncol; 2011 Apr; 121(1):152-6. PubMed ID: 21211831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Distribution of human papillomavirus types in ThinPrep Papanicolaou tests classified according to the Bethesda 2001 terminology and correlations with patient age and biopsy outcomes.
Evans MF; Adamson CS; Papillo JL; St John TL; Leiman G; Cooper K
Cancer; 2006 Mar; 106(5):1054-64. PubMed ID: 16421920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Utility of p16 Immunohistochemistry in Evaluating Negative Cervical Biopsies Following High-risk Pap Test Results.
Shain AF; Kwok S; Folkins AK; Kong CS
Am J Surg Pathol; 2018 Jan; 42(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 29112019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The significance of the Papanicolaou smear diagnosis of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
Nasser SM; Cibas ES; Crum CP; Faquin WC
Cancer; 2003 Oct; 99(5):272-6. PubMed ID: 14579293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A retrospective analysis on 1901 women with high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia by colposcopic biopsy.
Zhang X; Dou Y; Wang M; Li Y; Wang F; Xie X; Wang X
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2017 Oct; 217():53-58. PubMed ID: 28850822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Liquid-based cytology--new possibilities in the diagnosis of cervical lesions.
Juric D; Mahovlić V; Rajhvajn S; Ovanin-Rakić A; Skopljanac-Macina L; Barisić A; Projić IS; Babić D; Susa M; Corusić A; Oresković S
Coll Antropol; 2010 Mar; 34(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 20432728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
