These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
501 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24335320)
1. Commentary: the insanity defense and youths in juvenile court. Rogers JE; Myers WC J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2013; 41(4):496-500. PubMed ID: 24335320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Abolition of the insanity defense violates due process. Morse SJ; Bonnie RJ J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2013; 41(4):488-95. PubMed ID: 24335319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cruelty to the mentally ill: an Eighth Amendment challenge to the abolition of the insanity defense. LeBlanc SM Am Univ Law Rev; 2007 Jun; 56(5):1281-328. PubMed ID: 17632959 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Law & psychiatry: Does the constitution require an insanity defense? Appelbaum PS Psychiatr Serv; 2013 Oct; 64(10):943-5. PubMed ID: 24081400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Rationality Was Lost on the United States Supreme Court in Its Felthous AR J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2022 Mar; 50(1):97-105. PubMed ID: 34933935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Rational capacity and criminal responsibility in the USA. Felthous AR Int J Law Psychiatry; 2022; 83():101809. PubMed ID: 35738073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The competency of criminal defendants to refuse, for delusional reasons, a viable insanity defense recommended by counsel. Litwack TR Behav Sci Law; 2003; 21(2):135-56. PubMed ID: 12645042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Seeking an answer: questioning the validity of forcible medication to ensure mental competency of those condemned to die. Stricker BW McGeorge Law Rev; 2000; 32(1):317-40. PubMed ID: 15709265 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Of pills and needs: involuntarily medicating the psychotic inmate when execution looms. Cantor JD Indiana Health Law Rev; 2005; 2(1):117-70. PubMed ID: 17111502 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Constitutional law--substantive due process--Pennsylvania Supreme Court holds that criminal defendant's best interests justify forcible medication.--Commonwealth v. Sam, 952 A.2d 565 (Pa. 2008). Harv Law Rev; 2009 May; 122(7):1961-8. PubMed ID: 19492499 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Insane: James Holmes, Clark v. Arizona, and America's Insanity Defense. Collins E J Law Health; 2018; 31(1):33-54. PubMed ID: 30889333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Trial rights and psychotropic drugs: the case against administering involuntary medications to a defendant during trial. Klein DW Vanderbilt Law Rev; 2002; 55(1):165-218. PubMed ID: 12680366 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The slayer statute and insanity. Piel J; Leong GB J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2010; 38(2):258-62. PubMed ID: 20542948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Indiana v. Davis: revisiting due process rights of permanently incompetent defendants. Morris DR; Parker GF J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2009; 37(3):380-5. PubMed ID: 19767504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Monitored conditional release of persons found not guilty by reason of insanity. Bloom JD; Williams MH; Bigelow DA Am J Psychiatry; 1991 Apr; 148(4):444-8. PubMed ID: 2006688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Constitutional right to the insanity defense? Regan J; Regan W; Wright A Tenn Med; 2006 Sep; 99(9):39-40. PubMed ID: 17225781 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. In the public interest: intellectual disability, the Supreme Court, and the death penalty. Abeles N Am Psychol; 2010 Nov; 65(8):743-8. PubMed ID: 21058775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]