205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24335551)
1. Limits of agreement between measures obtained from standard laboratory and the point-of-care device Hemochron Signature Elite(R) during acute haemorrhage.
Gauss T; Hamada S; Jurcisin I; Dahmani S; Boudaoud L; Mantz J; Paugam-Burtz C
Br J Anaesth; 2014 Mar; 112(3):514-20. PubMed ID: 24335551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Performance of point-of-care international normalized ratio measurement to diagnose trauma-induced coagulopathy.
Mistral T; Boué Y; Bosson JL; Manhes P; Greze J; Brun J; Albaladejo P; Payen JF; Bouzat P
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med; 2017 Jun; 25(1):59. PubMed ID: 28637514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of five point-of-care prothrombin and activated partial thromboplastin time devices based on age of blood sample.
Searles B; Nasrallah F; Graham S; Lajara RB
J Extra Corpor Technol; 2002 Sep; 34(3):178-81. PubMed ID: 12395962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The accuracy of a point of care measurement of activated partial thromboplastin time in intensive care patients.
Karigowda L; Deshpande K; Jones S; Miller J
Pathology; 2019 Oct; 51(6):628-633. PubMed ID: 31445807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prospective comparison of point-of-care international normalised ratio measurement versus plasma international normalised ratio for acute traumatic coagulopathy.
Mitra B; O'Reilly G; Collecutt M; Cameron PA; Phillips L; Davis A
Emerg Med Australas; 2012 Aug; 24(4):363-8. PubMed ID: 22862752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reliability of the portable coagulometer qLabs to accurately measure the activated thromboplastin time and international normalized ratio: a prospective study in critically ill patients.
Casado-Méndez M; Arellano-Orden V; Muñoz-Gómez M; Rodríguez-Martorell FJ; Cayuela A; Pastor de Las Heras Á; Díaz Martín A; Pérez Torres I; Leal-Noval SR
Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis; 2018 Nov; 29(7):644-650. PubMed ID: 30234544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Point of care coagulometry in prehospital emergency care: an observational study.
Beynon C; Erk AG; Potzy A; Mohr S; Popp E
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med; 2015 Aug; 23():58. PubMed ID: 26260487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The influence of laboratory coagulation tests and clotting factor levels on Rotation Thromboelastometry (ROTEM(R)) during major surgery with hemorrhage.
Theusinger OM; Schröder CM; Eismon J; Emmert MY; Seifert B; Spahn DR; Baulig W
Anesth Analg; 2013 Aug; 117(2):314-21. PubMed ID: 23780419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bedside coagulometry during intravenous heparin therapy after coronary angioplasty.
Schroeder AP; Knudsen LL; Husted SE; Knudsen L; Ingerslev J
J Thromb Thrombolysis; 2001 Oct; 12(2):157-63. PubMed ID: 11729367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An analysis of discrepancy between point-of-care and central laboratory international normalized ratio testing in ED patients with cerebrovascular disease.
Nanduri S; Tayal AH; Hegde GG; Shang J; Venkat A
Am J Emerg Med; 2012 Nov; 30(9):2025-9. PubMed ID: 22795413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Point-of-care measurement of activated clotting time for cardiac surgery as measured by the Hemochron signature elite and the Abbott i-STAT: agreement, concordance, and clinical reliability.
Dirkmann D; Nagy E; Britten MW; Peters J
BMC Anesthesiol; 2019 Sep; 19(1):174. PubMed ID: 31492108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparability of the results of PT-INR with local MNPT and APTTR with MNAPTT on different coagulation analyzers in China.
Peng L; Yan C; Wu X; Nie L
Int J Lab Hematol; 2009 Jun; 31(3):352-8. PubMed ID: 18510575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Inaccuracy of point-of-care international normalized ratio in rivaroxaban-treated patients.
Baruch L; Sherman O
Ann Pharmacother; 2013 Sep; 47(9):1210-2. PubMed ID: 24259738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. All the bang without the bucks: Defining essential point-of-care testing for traumatic coagulopathy.
Goodman MD; Makley AT; Hanseman DJ; Pritts TA; Robinson BR
J Trauma Acute Care Surg; 2015 Jul; 79(1):117-24; discussion 124. PubMed ID: 26091324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Point-of-care derived INR does not reliably detect significant coagulopathy following Australian snakebite.
O'Rourke KM; Correlje E; Martin CL; Robertson JD; Isbister GK
Thromb Res; 2013 Nov; 132(5):610-3. PubMed ID: 24075725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Point of care and central laboratory determinations of the aPTT are not interchangeable in surgical intensive care patients.
Ferring M; Reber G; de Moerloose P; Merlani P; Diby M; Ricou B
Can J Anaesth; 2001 Dec; 48(11):1155-60. PubMed ID: 11744594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Thrombolysis in stroke patients: Comparability of point-of-care versus central laboratory international normalized ratio.
Dolscheid-Pommerich RC; Dolscheid S; Eichhorn L; Stoffel-Wagner B; Graeff I
PLoS One; 2018; 13(1):e0190867. PubMed ID: 29320558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The reliability of point-of-care prothrombin time testing. A comparison of CoaguChek S and XS INR measurements with hospital laboratory monitoring.
Ryan F; O'Shea S; Byrne S
Int J Lab Hematol; 2010 Feb; 32(1 Pt 1):e26-33. PubMed ID: 19032373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of the INR Values Measured by CoaguChek XS Coagulometer and Conventional Laboratory Methods in Patients on VKA Therapy.
Kalçık M; Yesin M; Gürsoy MO; Gündüz S; Karakoyun S; Astarcıoğlu MA; Bayam E; Cerşit S; Özkan M
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost; 2017 Mar; 23(2):187-194. PubMed ID: 26177662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Correlation of point-of-care International Normalized Ratio to laboratory International Normalized Ratio in hemodialysis patients taking warfarin.
Hoel RW; Albright RC; Beyer LK; Santrach PJ; Magtibay DL; Everson SL; McBane RD
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol; 2009 Jan; 4(1):99-104. PubMed ID: 18987294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
