These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24335551)

  • 21. Correction factor to improve agreement between point-of-care and laboratory International Normalized Ratio values.
    Johnson SA; Vazquez SR; Fleming R; Lanspa MJ
    Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2017 Jan; 74(1):e24-e31. PubMed ID: 28007718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Level of agreement between laboratory and point-of-care prothrombin time in patients after stopping or continuation of acenocoumarol anticoagulation: A comparison of diagnostic accuracy.
    de Vos EAJ; Hagen YJ; Meesters MI; Osmanovic N; Boer C; de Leeuw MA
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2018 Aug; 35(8):621-626. PubMed ID: 29474346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. An Agreement Study Between Point-of-Care and Laboratory Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time for Anticoagulation Monitoring During Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.
    Teng Y; Yan S; Liu G; Lou S; Zhang Y; Ji B
    Front Med (Lausanne); 2022; 9():931863. PubMed ID: 35847800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Difference in examination of coagulation function in heparin anticoagulant therapy between point of care tests and automatic coagulation analyzer].
    Li J; Cong YL; Tu GH; Yang L; Zhu BB; Jin L
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2007 May; 87(18):1269-71. PubMed ID: 17686264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Clinically significant differences between point-of-care analysers and a standard analyser for monitoring the International Normalized Ratio in oral anticoagulant therapy: a multi-instrument evaluation in a hospital outpatient setting.
    Moore GW; Henley A; Cotton SS; Tugnait S; Rangarajan S
    Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis; 2007 Apr; 18(3):287-92. PubMed ID: 17413768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Accuracy of the CoaguChek XS for point-of-care international normalized ratio (INR) measurement in children requiring warfarin.
    Bauman ME; Black KL; Massicotte MP; Bauman ML; Kuhle S; Howlett-Clyne S; Cembrowski GS; Bajzar L
    Thromb Haemost; 2008 Jun; 99(6):1097-103. PubMed ID: 18521514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Agreement between Coaguchek XS and STA-R Evolution (Hepato Quick) INR results depends on the level of INR.
    Biedermann JS; Leebeek FW; Buhre PN; de Lathouder S; Barends JP; de Maat MP; van der Meer FJ; Kruip MJ
    Thromb Res; 2015 Sep; 136(3):652-7. PubMed ID: 26164396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Near-patient testing for coagulopathy after cardiac surgery.
    Johi RR; Cross MH; Hansbro SD
    Br J Anaesth; 2003 Apr; 90(4):499-501. PubMed ID: 12644423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Agreement of point-of-care prothrombin and activated partial thromboplastin time in dogs with a reference laboratory.
    Yang W; Hosgood G; Luobikis K; Paul A
    Aust Vet J; 2018 Oct; 96(10):379-384. PubMed ID: 30255579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparing the prothrombin time INR versus the APTT to evaluate the coagulopathy of acute trauma.
    Yuan S; Ferrell C; Chandler WL
    Thromb Res; 2007; 120(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 16887171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Point-of-care (POC) measurement of coagulation after cardiac surgery.
    Boldt J; Walz G; Triem J; Suttner S; Kumle B
    Intensive Care Med; 1998 Nov; 24(11):1187-93. PubMed ID: 9876982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The clinical significance of differences between point-of-care and laboratory INR methods in over-anticoagulated patients.
    Lawrie AS; Hills J; Longair I; Green L; Gardiner C; Machin SJ; Cohen H
    Thromb Res; 2012 Jul; 130(1):110-4. PubMed ID: 21937093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Prothrombin time and thromboplastin time. On-site measurement of the prothrombin time and activated partial thromboplastin time of surgical patients with laser photometry].
    Tschaikowsky K; Balint R; Pscheidl E; Bremer F
    Anaesthesist; 1998 Apr; 47(4):295-302. PubMed ID: 9615846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Accuracy and clinical usefulness of the CoaguChek S and XS Point of Care devices when starting warfarin in a hospital outreach setting.
    Sobieraj-Teague M; Daniel D; Farrelly B; Coghlan D; Gallus A
    Thromb Res; 2009 Apr; 123(6):909-13. PubMed ID: 19042011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Accuracy of the avosure PT pro system compared with a hospital laboratory standard.
    Rigelsky JM; Choe HM; Curtis DM; Brosnan MJ; Mitrovich S; Streetman DS
    Ann Pharmacother; 2002 Mar; 36(3):380-5. PubMed ID: 11895047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Differences in warfarin dosing decisions based on international normalized ratio measurements with two point-of-care testing devices and a reference laboratory measurement.
    Shermock KM; Bragg L; Connor JT; Fink J; Mazzoli G; Kottke-Marchant K
    Pharmacotherapy; 2002 Nov; 22(11):1397-404. PubMed ID: 12432965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Coagulation monitoring in postcardiotomy ECMO: conventional tests, point-of-care, or both?
    Ranucci M; Baryshnikova E; Cotza M; Carboni G; Isgrò G; Carlucci C; Ballotta A;
    Minerva Anestesiol; 2016 Aug; 82(8):858-66. PubMed ID: 27050286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Variability in international normalized ratio and activated partial thromboplastin time after injury are not explained by coagulation factor deficits.
    Stettler GR; Moore EE; Moore HB; Nunns GR; Coleman JR; Colvis A; Ghasabyan A; Cohen MJ; Silliman CC; Banerjee A; Sauaia A
    J Trauma Acute Care Surg; 2019 Sep; 87(3):582-589. PubMed ID: 31136528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Reliability of a point-of-care device for international normalized ratio testing during the three surgical phases of orthotopic liver transplantation: a retrospective observational study.
    Mace HS; Lightfoot NJ; Cordero-Rochet MJ; Srinivas C; Karkouti K; McCluskey SA
    Can J Anaesth; 2015 Mar; 62(3):258-64. PubMed ID: 25666228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Transiently increased variation between a Point-of-Care and laboratory INR method after a long period of correlation: a case study demonstrating the need for ongoing correlation of POC with the central laboratory.
    Sephel GC; Laposata M
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2013 Oct; 140(4):475-86. PubMed ID: 24045543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.