These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24335604)

  • 1. Reward-based transfer from bottom-up to top-down search tasks.
    Lee J; Shomstein S
    Psychol Sci; 2014 Feb; 25(2):466-75. PubMed ID: 24335604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Neural correlates of context-dependent feature conjunction learning in visual search tasks.
    Reavis EA; Frank SM; Greenlee MW; Tse PU
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2016 Jun; 37(6):2319-30. PubMed ID: 26970441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Top-down but not bottom-up visual scanning is affected in hereditary pure cerebellar ataxia.
    Matsuda S; Matsumoto H; Furubayashi T; Fukuda H; Emoto M; Hanajima R; Tsuji S; Ugawa Y; Terao Y
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(12):e116181. PubMed ID: 25545148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Top-down directed attention to stimulus features and attentional allocation to bottom-up deviations.
    Sawaki R; Katayama J
    J Vis; 2008 Nov; 8(15):4.1-8. PubMed ID: 19146288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perceptual Competition Promotes Suppression of Reward Salience in Behavioral Selection and Neural Representation.
    Gong M; Jia K; Li S
    J Neurosci; 2017 Jun; 37(26):6242-6252. PubMed ID: 28539425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Overt attentional capture by reward-related stimuli overcomes inhibitory suppression.
    Pearson D; Watson P; Cheng PX; Le Pelley ME
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 May; 46(5):489-501. PubMed ID: 32191108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Attentional capture by Pavlovian reward-signalling distractors in visual search persists when rewards are removed.
    Watson P; Pearson D; Most SB; Theeuwes J; Wiers RW; Le Pelley ME
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(12):e0226284. PubMed ID: 31830126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Physical Salience and Value-Driven Salience Operate through Different Neural Mechanisms to Enhance Attentional Selection.
    Bachman MD; Wang L; Gamble ML; Woldorff MG
    J Neurosci; 2020 Jul; 40(28):5455-5464. PubMed ID: 32471878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Selection history alters attentional filter settings persistently and beyond top-down control.
    Kadel H; Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Schubö A
    Psychophysiology; 2017 May; 54(5):736-754. PubMed ID: 28169422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bottom-up and top-down attention are independent.
    Pinto Y; van der Leij AR; Sligte IG; Lamme VA; Scholte HS
    J Vis; 2013 Jul; 13(3):16. PubMed ID: 23863334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impaired top-down control of visual search in schizophrenia.
    Gold JM; Fuller RL; Robinson BM; Braun EL; Luck SJ
    Schizophr Res; 2007 Aug; 94(1-3):148-55. PubMed ID: 17544632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Value-driven attentional capture in neglect.
    Bourgeois A; Saj A; Vuilleumier P
    Cortex; 2018 Dec; 109():260-271. PubMed ID: 30391880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Rewarded visual items capture attention only in heterogeneous contexts.
    Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Brandhofer R; Schubö A
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Jul; 53(7):1063-73. PubMed ID: 26997364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impairments in top down attentional processes in right parietal patients: paradoxical functional facilitation in visual search.
    Mangano GR; Oliveri M; Turriziani P; Smirni D; Zhaoping L; Cipolotti L
    Vision Res; 2014 Apr; 97():74-82. PubMed ID: 24582796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fortune and reversals of fortune in visual search: Reward contingencies for pop-out targets affect search efficiency and target repetition effects.
    Kristjánsson A; Sigurjónsdóttir O; Driver J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Jul; 72(5):1229-36. PubMed ID: 20601703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Visual search: bottom-up or top-down?
    Patel GA; Sathian K
    Front Biosci; 2000 Jan; 5():D169-93. PubMed ID: 10702378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Irrelevant reward and selection histories have different influences on task-relevant attentional selection.
    MacLean MH; Giesbrecht B
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Jul; 77(5):1515-28. PubMed ID: 25813737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Distractor context manipulation in visual search: How expectations modulate proactive control.
    Petilli MA; Marini F; Daini R
    Cognition; 2020 Mar; 196():104129. PubMed ID: 31765925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reward association facilitates distractor suppression in human visual search.
    Gong M; Yang F; Li S
    Eur J Neurosci; 2016 Apr; 43(7):942-53. PubMed ID: 26797805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Top-Down Processes Override Bottom-Up Interference in the Flanker Task.
    Avital-Cohen R; Tsal Y
    Psychol Sci; 2016 May; 27(5):651-8. PubMed ID: 26993739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.