These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

282 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24335631)

  • 1. Rate of adjacent segment disease in cervical disc arthroplasty versus single-level fusion: meta-analysis of prospective studies.
    Verma K; Gandhi SD; Maltenfort M; Albert TJ; Hilibrand AS; Vaccaro AR; Radcliff KE
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Dec; 38(26):2253-7. PubMed ID: 24335631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Incidence of adjacent segment degeneration in cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical decompression and fusion meta-analysis of prospective studies.
    Luo J; Gong M; Huang S; Yu T; Zou X
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2015 Feb; 135(2):155-160. PubMed ID: 25424753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Adjacent segment degeneration or disease after cervical total disc replacement: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Xu S; Liang Y; Zhu Z; Qian Y; Liu H
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2018 Oct; 13(1):244. PubMed ID: 30285807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Adjacent segment motion after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus Prodisc-c cervical total disk arthroplasty: analysis from a randomized, controlled trial.
    Kelly MP; Mok JM; Frisch RF; Tay BK
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Jul; 36(15):1171-9. PubMed ID: 21217449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparable long-term outcomes in patients undergoing total disc replacement or anterior cervical discectomy and noninstrumented fusion.
    Hirvonen T; Hämäläinen M; Konsti J; Antinheimo J; Numminen J; Siironen J; Koski-Palkén A; Niemelä M
    Spine J; 2023 Dec; 23(12):1817-1829. PubMed ID: 37660896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Adjacent segment disease requiring reoperation in cervical total disc arthroplasty: A literature review and update.
    Chang KE; Pham MH; Hsieh PC
    J Clin Neurosci; 2017 Mar; 37():20-24. PubMed ID: 27865820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) versus cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) for two contiguous levels cervical disc degenerative disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Zou S; Gao J; Xu B; Lu X; Han Y; Meng H
    Eur Spine J; 2017 Apr; 26(4):985-997. PubMed ID: 27314663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Subsequent surgery rates after cervical total disc replacement using a Mobi-C Cervical Disc Prosthesis versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a prospective randomized clinical trial with 5-year follow-up.
    Jackson RJ; Davis RJ; Hoffman GA; Bae HW; Hisey MS; Kim KD; Gaede SE; Nunley PD
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 May; 24(5):734-45. PubMed ID: 26799118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The change of adjacent segment after cervical disc arthroplasty compared with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Dong L; Xu Z; Chen X; Wang D; Li D; Liu T; Hao D
    Spine J; 2017 Oct; 17(10):1549-1558. PubMed ID: 28625479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Rate of Adjacent Segment Degeneration of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty Versus Fusion Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
    Luo J; Wang H; Peng J; Deng Z; Zhang Z; Liu S; Wang D; Gong M; Tang S
    World Neurosurg; 2018 May; 113():225-231. PubMed ID: 29499425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Factors affecting the incidence of symptomatic adjacent-level disease in cervical spine after total disc arthroplasty: 2- to 4-year follow-up of 3 prospective randomized trials.
    Nunley PD; Jawahar A; Kerr EJ; Gordon CJ; Cavanaugh DA; Birdsong EM; Stocks M; Danielson G
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Mar; 37(6):445-51. PubMed ID: 21587111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prospective randomized study of cervical arthroplasty and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with long-term follow-up: results in 74 patients from a single site.
    Coric D; Kim PK; Clemente JD; Boltes MO; Nussbaum M; James S
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Jan; 18(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 23140129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Two-level total disc replacement with Mobi-C cervical artificial disc versus anterior discectomy and fusion: a prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter clinical trial with 4-year follow-up results.
    Davis RJ; Nunley PD; Kim KD; Hisey MS; Jackson RJ; Bae HW; Hoffman GA; Gaede SE; Danielson GO; Gordon C; Stone MB
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Jan; 22(1):15-25. PubMed ID: 25380538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A RCT comparing 7-year clinical outcomes of one level symptomatic cervical disc disease (SCDD) following ProDisc-C total disc arthroplasty (TDA) versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).
    Loumeau TP; Darden BV; Kesman TJ; Odum SM; Van Doren BA; Laxer EB; Murrey DB
    Eur Spine J; 2016 Jul; 25(7):2263-70. PubMed ID: 26869078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cervical Disc Arthroplasty Versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for Incidence of Symptomatic Adjacent Segment Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Prospective Randomized Controlled Trials.
    Zhu Y; Zhang B; Liu H; Wu Y; Zhu Q
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Oct; 41(19):1493-1502. PubMed ID: 26926472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cervical total disc replacement with the Mobi-C cervical artificial disc compared with anterior discectomy and fusion for treatment of 2-level symptomatic degenerative disc disease: a prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter clinical trial: clinical article.
    Davis RJ; Kim KD; Hisey MS; Hoffman GA; Bae HW; Gaede SE; Rashbaum RF; Nunley PD; Peterson DL; Stokes JK
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Nov; 19(5):532-45. PubMed ID: 24010901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cervical kinematics and radiological changes after Discover artificial disc replacement versus fusion.
    Hou Y; Liu Y; Yuan W; Wang X; Chen H; Yang L; Zhang Y
    Spine J; 2014 Jun; 14(6):867-77. PubMed ID: 24076441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Factors affecting reoperations after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion within and outside of a Federal Drug Administration investigational device exemption cervical disc replacement trial.
    Singh K; Phillips FM; Park DK; Pelton MA; An HS; Goldberg EJ
    Spine J; 2012 May; 12(5):372-8. PubMed ID: 22425784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cervical arthroplasty versus anterior cervical fusion for symptomatic adjacent segment disease after anterior cervical fusion surgery: Review of treatment in 41 patients.
    Lee SB; Cho KS
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2017 Nov; 162():59-66. PubMed ID: 28938108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Adjacent segment pathology following cervical motion-sparing procedures or devices compared with fusion surgery: a systematic review.
    Harrod CC; Hilibrand AS; Fischer DJ; Skelly AC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Oct; 37(22 Suppl):S96-S112. PubMed ID: 22872222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.