These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24335719)
1. Families are warned they can't decide treatment for incapacitated relatives. Dyer C BMJ; 2013 Dec; 347():f7436. PubMed ID: 24335719 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Cruzan v. Harmon and the dangerous claim that others can exercise an incapacitated patient's right to die. Ellman IM Jurimetrics; 1989; 29(4):389-401. PubMed ID: 11652559 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. New law proposed for treating mentally incapacitated people. Dyer C BMJ; 1993 May; 306(6887):1226. PubMed ID: 11643132 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Medical decisionmaking for the incompetent person: a comprehensive approach. Marzen TJ Issues Law Med; 1986 Jan; 1(4):293-317. PubMed ID: 11651815 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Medicinal products and consent by mentally incapacitated patients. Dimond B Br J Nurs; 2003 Nov 13-26; 12(20):1228-31. PubMed ID: 14685129 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The library card. Farris G Lancet; 2015 Feb; 385(9970):766-7. PubMed ID: 25752166 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Who Decides When a Patient Can't? Statutes on Alternate Decision Makers. DeMartino ES; Dudzinski DM; Doyle CK; Sperry BP; Gregory SE; Siegler M; Sulmasy DP; Mueller PS; Kramer DB N Engl J Med; 2017 Apr; 376(15):1478-1482. PubMed ID: 28402767 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The role of families in medical decisions. Minow M Utah Law Rev; 1991; 1991(1):1-24. PubMed ID: 11659479 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. House of Lords on care for dying. Bull Med Ethics; 1994 Feb; No. 95():13-6. PubMed ID: 11652723 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Ends and means of life: the Supreme Court and withdrawal of nutrition and hydration. Feenan D J Ir Med Assoc; 1995; 88(5):152, 151. PubMed ID: 11657627 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Deciding for the incompetent patient: identifying the role of family members. Healey JM Conn Med; 1984 Oct; 48(10):687. PubMed ID: 11644167 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of a values discussion on congruence between elderly women and their families on critical health care decisions. Matheis-Kraft C; Roberto KA J Women Aging; 1997; 9(4):5-22. PubMed ID: 11655362 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Falling off the vine: legal fictions and the doctrine of substituted judgment. Harmon L Yale Law J; 1990 Oct; 100(1):1-71. PubMed ID: 11659389 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The evanescence of living wills. Francis LP Real Property Probate Trust J; 1989; 24(1):141-64. PubMed ID: 11652557 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Right to die: a survey of legislative and judicial responses to life-support technology. Richardson E Glendale Law Rev; 1981-1982; 5(2):188-202. PubMed ID: 11652441 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The encouragment of empathy: just decisionmaking for incompetent terminal patients. Oxman ML J Law Health; 1988-1989; 3(2):189-217. PubMed ID: 11652566 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Privacy I: surrogate decision making for the terminally ill. Eisenberg KG Annu Surv Am Law; 1988; 1(2):353-84. PubMed ID: 11652656 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Therefore, choose death. Brown ML Human Rights; 1982; 10(3):38-45. PubMed ID: 11651709 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Coming to terms with death: the Cruzan case. Martyn SR; Bourguignon HJ Hastings Law J; 1991 Mar; 42(3):817-58. PubMed ID: 11652588 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]