333 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24335932)
1. Insertion depth angles of cochlear implant arrays with varying length: a temporal bone study.
Franke-Trieger A; Jolly C; Darbinjan A; Zahnert T; Mürbe D
Otol Neurotol; 2014 Jan; 35(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 24335932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In vivo measurements of the insertion depth of cochlear implant arrays using flat-panel volume computed tomography.
Trieger A; Schulze A; Schneider M; Zahnert T; Mürbe D
Otol Neurotol; 2011 Jan; 32(1):152-7. PubMed ID: 20962701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Estimation of insertion depth angle based on cochlea diameter and linear insertion depth: a prediction tool for the CI422.
Franke-Trieger A; Mürbe D
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Nov; 272(11):3193-9. PubMed ID: 25361895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The size of the cochlea and predictions of insertion depth angles for cochlear implant electrodes.
Escudé B; James C; Deguine O; Cochard N; Eter E; Fraysse B
Audiol Neurootol; 2006; 11 Suppl 1():27-33. PubMed ID: 17063008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cochlear Implant Insertion Depth Prediction: A Temporal Bone Accuracy Study.
Anschuetz L; Weder S; Mantokoudis G; Kompis M; Caversaccio M; Wimmer W
Otol Neurotol; 2018 Dec; 39(10):e996-e1001. PubMed ID: 30303947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Skull Radiograph and Computed Tomography Measurements of Cochlear Implant Insertion Angles.
Gallant S; Friedmann DR; Hagiwara M; Roland JT; Svirsky MA; Jethanamest D
Otol Neurotol; 2019 Mar; 40(3):e298-e303. PubMed ID: 30741910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Insertion Depth in Cochlear Implantation and Outcome in Residual Hearing and Vestibular Function.
Nordfalk KF; Rasmussen K; Hopp E; Bunne M; Silvola JT; Jablonski GE
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(2):e129-37. PubMed ID: 26524566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Development of Insertion Models Predicting Cochlear Implant Electrode Position.
van der Marel KS; Briaire JJ; Wolterbeek R; Verbist BM; Frijns JH
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(4):473-82. PubMed ID: 26760199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Atraumaticity study of 2 cochlear implant electrode arrays.
Manrique M; Picciafuoco S; Manrique R; Sanhueza I; Domínguez P; Pérez N; Zubieta JL; de Abajo J
Otol Neurotol; 2014 Apr; 35(4):619-28. PubMed ID: 24569795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Measurement of Cochlear Implant Electrode Position From Intraoperative Post-insertion Skull Radiographs: A Validation Study.
Svrakic M; Friedmann DR; Berman PM; Davis AJ; Roland JT; Svirsky MA
Otol Neurotol; 2015 Sep; 36(9):1486-91. PubMed ID: 26375970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hearing preservation after cochlear implantation using deeply inserted flex atraumatic electrode arrays.
Tamir S; Ferrary E; Borel S; Sterkers O; Bozorg Grayeli A
Audiol Neurootol; 2012; 17(5):331-7. PubMed ID: 22813984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Depth of electrode insertion and postoperative performance in humans with cochlear implants: a histopathologic study.
Lee J; Nadol JB; Eddington DK
Audiol Neurootol; 2010; 15(5):323-31. PubMed ID: 20203481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Postoperative radiographic assessment of the Combi 40 cochlear implant.
Czerny C; Steiner E; Gstoettner W; Baumgartner WD; Imhof H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Dec; 169(6):1689-94. PubMed ID: 9393191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of depth of electrode insertion between cochleostomy and round window approach: a cadaveric study.
Jangra A; Das KN; Sharma V; Timmaraju S; Khera P; Tiwari S; Soni K; Choudhury B; Ghatak S; Dixit SG; Nayyar AK; Goyal A
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2024 Jul; 281(7):3547-3555. PubMed ID: 38294508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. First Experience With a New Thin Lateral Wall Electrode in Human Temporal Bones.
Lenarz T; Avci E; Gazibegovic D; Salcher R
Otol Neurotol; 2019 Aug; 40(7):872-877. PubMed ID: 31058753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical investigation of the Nucleus Slim Modiolar Electrode.
Aschendorff A; Briggs R; Brademann G; Helbig S; Hornung J; Lenarz T; Marx M; Ramos A; Stöver T; Escudé B; James CJ
Audiol Neurootol; 2017; 22(3):169-179. PubMed ID: 29059669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Surgical approach for complete cochlear coverage in EAS-patients after residual hearing loss.
Weiss NM; Dhanasingh A; Schraven SP; Schulze M; Langner S; Mlynski R
PLoS One; 2019; 14(9):e0223121. PubMed ID: 31557251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cone beam CT for perioperative imaging in hearing preservation Cochlear implantation - a human cadaveric study.
Nateghifard K; Low D; Awofala L; Srikanthan D; Kuthubutheen J; Daly M; Chan H; Irish J; Chen J; Lin V; Le TN
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2019 Nov; 48(1):65. PubMed ID: 31753027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Imaging cochlear implantation with round window insertion in human temporal bones and cochlear morphological variation using high-resolution cone beam CT.
Zou J; Lähelmä J; Koivisto J; Dhanasingh A; Jolly C; Aarnisalo A; Wolff J; Pyykkö I
Acta Otolaryngol; 2015 May; 135(5):466-72. PubMed ID: 25675836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intracochlear Position of Cochlear Implants Determined Using CT Scanning versus Fitting Levels: Higher Threshold Levels at Basal Turn.
van der Beek FB; Briaire JJ; van der Marel KS; Verbist BM; Frijns JH
Audiol Neurootol; 2016; 21(1):54-67. PubMed ID: 26891130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
