These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24336453)

  • 1. A multicomponent decision tool for prioritising the updating of systematic reviews.
    Takwoingi Y; Hopewell S; Tovey D; Sutton AJ
    BMJ; 2013 Dec; 347():f7191. PubMed ID: 24336453
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evidence-based practice: how to perform and use systematic reviews for clinical decision-making.
    Kranke P
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2010 Sep; 27(9):763-72. PubMed ID: 20523217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pragmatic vs. explanatory: an adaptation of the PRECIS tool helps to judge the applicability of systematic reviews for daily practice.
    Koppenaal T; Linmans J; Knottnerus JA; Spigt M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Oct; 64(10):1095-101. PubMed ID: 21474282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Systematic reviews - Cochrane and evidence-based medicine.
    Flood LM
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2007 Feb; 32(1):66. PubMed ID: 17298318
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Capture-mark-recapture to estimate the number of missed articles for systematic reviews in surgery.
    Stelfox HT; Foster G; Niven D; Kirkpatrick AW; Goldsmith CH
    Am J Surg; 2013 Sep; 206(3):439-40. PubMed ID: 23759696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Systematic reviews, Cochrane and evidence-based medicine - why I prize prudent scepticism above indefensible certainty.
    Burton MJ
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2007 Feb; 32(1):60-3. PubMed ID: 17298316
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Investing in updating: how do conclusions change when Cochrane systematic reviews are updated?
    French SD; McDonald S; McKenzie JE; Green SE
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2005 Oct; 5():33. PubMed ID: 16225692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Systematic reviews and infected diabetic foot ulcers.
    O'Meara S; Nelson EA
    Nurs Stand; 2003 Oct 22-28; 18(6):61-4, 66, 68. PubMed ID: 14618896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Usefulness of Cochrane Skin Group reviews for clinical practice.
    Davila-Seijo P; Batalla A; Garcia-Doval I
    Actas Dermosifiliogr; 2013 Oct; 104(8):679-84. PubMed ID: 23954044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The capture-mark-recapture technique can be used as a stopping rule when searching in systematic reviews.
    Kastner M; Straus SE; McKibbon KA; Goldsmith CH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Feb; 62(2):149-57. PubMed ID: 18722088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Updating systematic reviews--when and how?
    Tugwell P; Knottnerus A; Idzerda L
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Sep; 64(9):933-5. PubMed ID: 21784320
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A framework for best evidence approaches can improve the transparency of systematic reviews.
    Treadwell JR; Singh S; Talati R; McPheeters ML; Reston JT
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Nov; 65(11):1159-62. PubMed ID: 23017634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Systematic reviews explained: AMSTAR-how to tell the good from the bad and the ugly.
    Sharif MO; Janjua-Sharif FN; Ali H; Ahmed F
    Oral Health Dent Manag; 2013 Mar; 12(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 23474576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reading systematic reviews.
    Peach H
    Aust Fam Physician; 2002 Aug; 31(8):736-40. PubMed ID: 12189665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Systematic reviews for evidence-based management: how to find them and what to do with them.
    Chan KS; Morton SC; Shekelle PG
    Am J Manag Care; 2004 Nov; 10(11 Pt 1):806-12. PubMed ID: 15623270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Does updating improve the methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews?
    Shea B; Boers M; Grimshaw JM; Hamel C; Bouter LM
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 Jun; 6():27. PubMed ID: 16772030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Rapid reviews for evidence-based decision support. (Restricting) requirements].
    Ziegler S; Lühmann D; Raspe H; Windeler J
    Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 2001 Feb; 95(2):105-11. PubMed ID: 11268875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [It's easy to search medical information on the Internet. How to search--step by step].
    Alton V; Eliasson M
    Lakartidningen; 2000 Oct; 97(40):4426-32, 4434. PubMed ID: 11068398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Decisions to update comparative drug effectiveness reviews vary based on type of new evidence.
    Peterson K; McDonagh MS; Fu R
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Sep; 64(9):977-84. PubMed ID: 21411283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Deconstructing evidence in orthodontics: making sense of systematic reviews, randomized clinical trials, and meta-analyses.
    Rinchuse DJ; Rinchuse DJ; Kandasamy S; Ackerman MB
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):167-76. PubMed ID: 18575311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.