These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24337321)

  • 1. On the exact distribution of the numbers of alleles in DNA mixtures.
    Tvedebrink T
    Int J Legal Med; 2014 May; 128(3):427-37. PubMed ID: 24337321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Exploratory data analysis for the interpretation of low template DNA mixtures.
    Haned H; Slooten K; Gill P
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):762-74. PubMed ID: 22981542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Inference about the number of contributors to a DNA mixture: Comparative analyses of a Bayesian network approach and the maximum allele count method.
    Biedermann A; Bozza S; Konis K; Taroni F
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):689-96. PubMed ID: 22534257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The number of alleles in DNA mixtures with related contributors.
    Kruijver M; Curran JM
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2022 Nov; 61():102748. PubMed ID: 35961259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Expanding beyond the current core STR loci: An exploration of 73 STR markers with increased diversity for enhanced DNA mixture deconvolution.
    Novroski NMM; Wendt FR; Woerner AE; Bus MM; Coble M; Budowle B
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Jan; 38():121-129. PubMed ID: 30396008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validation of a DNA mixture statistics tool incorporating allelic drop-out and drop-in.
    Mitchell AA; Tamariz J; O'Connell K; Ducasse N; Budimlija Z; Prinz M; Caragine T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):749-61. PubMed ID: 22999739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of stochastic variation in mixed and unmixed casework and synthetic samples.
    Bright JA; McManus K; Harbison S; Gill P; Buckleton J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Mar; 6(2):180-4. PubMed ID: 21550327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Inclusion probability with dropout: an operational formula.
    Milot E; Courteau J; Crispino F; Mailly F
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 May; 16():71-76. PubMed ID: 25559642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An assessment of the information content of likelihood ratios derived from complex mixtures.
    Marsden CD; Rudin N; Inman K; Lohmueller KE
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 May; 22():64-72. PubMed ID: 26851613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimating number of contributors in massively parallel sequencing data of STR loci.
    Young BA; Gettings KB; McCord B; Vallone PM
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Jan; 38():15-22. PubMed ID: 30312966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mixture interpretation: defining the relevant features for guidelines for the assessment of mixed DNA profiles in forensic casework.
    Budowle B; Onorato AJ; Callaghan TF; Della Manna A; Gross AM; Guerrieri RA; Luttman JC; McClure DL
    J Forensic Sci; 2009 Jul; 54(4):810-21. PubMed ID: 19368620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development and validation of open-source software for DNA mixture interpretation based on a quantitative continuous model.
    Manabe S; Morimoto C; Hamano Y; Fujimoto S; Tamaki K
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(11):e0188183. PubMed ID: 29149210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. DNA commission of the International Society of Forensic Genetics: Recommendations on the evaluation of STR typing results that may include drop-out and/or drop-in using probabilistic methods.
    Gill P; Gusmão L; Haned H; Mayr WR; Morling N; Parson W; Prieto L; Prinz M; Schneider H; Schneider PM; Weir BS
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):679-88. PubMed ID: 22864188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Maximizing allele detection: Effects of analytical threshold and DNA levels on rates of allele and locus drop-out.
    Rakay CA; Bregu J; Grgicak CM
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):723-8. PubMed ID: 22796031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Distinguishing between donors and their relatives in complex DNA mixtures with binary models.
    Slooten K
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Mar; 21():95-109. PubMed ID: 26745184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimating the probability of allelic drop-out of STR alleles in forensic genetics.
    Tvedebrink T; Eriksen PS; Mogensen HS; Morling N
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2009 Sep; 3(4):222-6. PubMed ID: 19647706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Estimation of the number of contributors of theoretical mixture profiles based on allele counting: Does increasing the number of loci increase success rate of estimates?
    Dembinski GM; Sobieralski C; Picard CJ
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Mar; 33():24-32. PubMed ID: 29175725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of wild card designations and rare alleles in forensic DNA database searches.
    Tvedebrink T; Bright JA; Buckleton JS; Curran JM; Morling N
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 May; 16():98-104. PubMed ID: 25576850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Automated estimation of the number of contributors in autosomal short tandem repeat profiles using a machine learning approach.
    Benschop CCG; van der Linden J; Hoogenboom J; Ypma R; Haned H
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Nov; 43():102150. PubMed ID: 31476660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Inferring the Number of Contributors to Complex DNA Mixtures Using Three Methods: Exploring the Limits of Low-Template DNA Interpretation.
    Alfonse LE; Tejada G; Swaminathan H; Lun DS; Grgicak CM
    J Forensic Sci; 2017 Mar; 62(2):308-316. PubMed ID: 27907229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.