BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24337608)

  • 1. Qualitative and quantitative comparison of PET/CT and PET/MR imaging in clinical practice.
    Al-Nabhani KZ; Syed R; Michopoulou S; Alkalbani J; Afaq A; Panagiotidis E; O'Meara C; Groves A; Ell P; Bomanji J
    J Nucl Med; 2014 Jan; 55(1):88-94. PubMed ID: 24337608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance of whole-body integrated 18F-FDG PET/MR in comparison to PET/CT for evaluation of malignant bone lesions.
    Eiber M; Takei T; Souvatzoglou M; Mayerhoefer ME; Fürst S; Gaertner FC; Loeffelbein DJ; Rummeny EJ; Ziegler SI; Schwaiger M; Beer AJ
    J Nucl Med; 2014 Feb; 55(2):191-7. PubMed ID: 24309383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Integrated whole-body PET/MR hybrid imaging: clinical experience.
    Quick HH; von Gall C; Zeilinger M; Wiesmüller M; Braun H; Ziegler S; Kuwert T; Uder M; Dörfler A; Kalender WA; Lell M
    Invest Radiol; 2013 May; 48(5):280-9. PubMed ID: 23442775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Qualitative and quantitative performance of ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/MRI versus ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT in patients with head and neck cancer.
    Partovi S; Kohan A; Vercher-Conejero JL; Rubbert C; Margevicius S; Schluchter MD; Gaeta C; Faulhaber P; Robbin MR
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2014 Oct; 35(10):1970-5. PubMed ID: 24924545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. PET/MRI with diagnostic MR sequences vs PET/CT in the detection of abdominal and pelvic cancer.
    Xin J; Ma Q; Guo Q; Sun H; Zhang S; Liu C; Zhai W
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Apr; 85(4):751-9. PubMed ID: 26971419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improving MR sequence of 18F-FDG PET/MR for diagnosing and staging gastric Cancer: a comparison study to
    Zheng D; Liu Y; Liu J; Li K; Lin M; Schmidt H; Xu B; Tian J
    Cancer Imaging; 2020 Jun; 20(1):39. PubMed ID: 32546207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. First clinical experience with integrated whole-body PET/MR: comparison to PET/CT in patients with oncologic diagnoses.
    Drzezga A; Souvatzoglou M; Eiber M; Beer AJ; Fürst S; Martinez-Möller A; Nekolla SG; Ziegler S; Ganter C; Rummeny EJ; Schwaiger M
    J Nucl Med; 2012 Jun; 53(6):845-55. PubMed ID: 22534830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MRI, ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT, MRI, and CT in whole-body staging of recurrent breast cancer.
    Sawicki LM; Grueneisen J; Schaarschmidt BM; Buchbender C; Nagarajah J; Umutlu L; Antoch G; Kinner S
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Feb; 85(2):459-65. PubMed ID: 26781152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pulmonary lesion assessment: comparison of whole-body hybrid MR/PET and PET/CT imaging--pilot study.
    Schwenzer NF; Schraml C; Müller M; Brendle C; Sauter A; Spengler W; Pfannenberg AC; Claussen CD; Schmidt H
    Radiology; 2012 Aug; 264(2):551-8. PubMed ID: 22653189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance in Lymphoma: Comparison With 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography and With the Addition of Magnetic Resonance Diffusion-Weighted Imaging.
    Giraudo C; Raderer M; Karanikas G; Weber M; Kiesewetter B; Dolak W; Simonitsch-Klupp I; Mayerhoefer ME
    Invest Radiol; 2016 Mar; 51(3):163-9. PubMed ID: 26784400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of lesion detection and quantitation of tracer uptake between PET from a simultaneously acquiring whole-body PET/MR hybrid scanner and PET from PET/CT.
    Wiesmüller M; Quick HH; Navalpakkam B; Lell MM; Uder M; Ritt P; Schmidt D; Beck M; Kuwert T; von Gall CC
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2013 Jan; 40(1):12-21. PubMed ID: 23053323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Correlation of simultaneously acquired diffusion-weighted imaging and 2-deoxy-[18F] fluoro-2-D-glucose positron emission tomography of pulmonary lesions in a dedicated whole-body magnetic resonance/positron emission tomography system.
    Schmidt H; Brendle C; Schraml C; Martirosian P; Bezrukov I; Hetzel J; Müller M; Sauter A; Claussen CD; Pfannenberg C; Schwenzer NF
    Invest Radiol; 2013 May; 48(5):247-55. PubMed ID: 23519008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of whole-body PET/CT and PET/MRI in breast cancer patients: lesion detection and quantitation of 18F-deoxyglucose uptake in lesions and in normal organ tissues.
    Pace L; Nicolai E; Luongo A; Aiello M; Catalano OA; Soricelli A; Salvatore M
    Eur J Radiol; 2014 Feb; 83(2):289-96. PubMed ID: 24331845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
    Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
    Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Detection rate, location, and size of pulmonary nodules in trimodality PET/CT-MR: comparison of low-dose CT and Dixon-based MR imaging.
    Stolzmann P; Veit-Haibach P; Chuck N; Rossi C; Frauenfelder T; Alkadhi H; von Schulthess G; Boss A
    Invest Radiol; 2013 May; 48(5):241-6. PubMed ID: 23070096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Contrast-enhanced PET/MR imaging versus contrast-enhanced PET/CT in head and neck cancer: how much MR information is needed?
    Kuhn FP; Hüllner M; Mader CE; Kastrinidis N; Huber GF; von Schulthess GK; Kollias S; Veit-Haibach P
    J Nucl Med; 2014 Apr; 55(4):551-8. PubMed ID: 24491410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. PET/MR imaging in the detection and characterization of pulmonary lesions: technical and diagnostic evaluation in comparison to PET/CT.
    Rauscher I; Eiber M; Fürst S; Souvatzoglou M; Nekolla SG; Ziegler SI; Rummeny EJ; Schwaiger M; Beer AJ
    J Nucl Med; 2014 May; 55(5):724-9. PubMed ID: 24652827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of integrated whole-body [11C]choline PET/MR with PET/CT in patients with prostate cancer.
    Souvatzoglou M; Eiber M; Takei T; Fürst S; Maurer T; Gaertner F; Geinitz H; Drzezga A; Ziegler S; Nekolla SG; Rummeny EJ; Schwaiger M; Beer AJ
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2013 Oct; 40(10):1486-99. PubMed ID: 23817684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical issues regarding misclassification by Dixon based PET/MR attenuation correction.
    Kong E; Cho I
    Hell J Nucl Med; 2015; 18(1):42-7. PubMed ID: 25840572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Qualitative FDG PET Image Assessment Using Automated Three-Segment MR Attenuation Correction Versus CT Attenuation Correction in a Tertiary Pediatric Hospital: A Prospective Study.
    Lyons K; Seghers V; Williams JL; Sorensen JI; Paldino MJ; Krishnamurthy R; Rohren EM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Sep; 205(3):652-8. PubMed ID: 26295654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.