126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24337733)
1. Field evaluation of the CRT and ACON chlamydia point-of-care tests in a tropical, low-resource setting.
Hurly DS; Buhrer-Skinner M; Badman SG; Bulu S; Tabrizi SN; Tarivonda L; Muller R
Sex Transm Infect; 2014 May; 90(3):179-84. PubMed ID: 24337733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Alarmingly poor performance in Chlamydia trachomatis point-of-care testing.
van Dommelen L; van Tiel FH; Ouburg S; Brouwers EE; Terporten PH; Savelkoul PH; Morré SA; Bruggeman CA; Hoebe CJ
Sex Transm Infect; 2010 Oct; 86(5):355-9. PubMed ID: 20876754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The performance of non-NAAT point-of-care (POC) tests and rapid NAAT tests for chlamydia and gonorrhoea infections. An assessment of currently available assays.
Brook G
Sex Transm Infect; 2015 Dec; 91(8):539-44. PubMed ID: 25935930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Point-of-care test for detection of urogenital chlamydia in women shows low sensitivity. A performance evaluation study in two clinics in Suriname.
van der Helm JJ; Sabajo LO; Grunberg AW; Morré SA; Speksnijder AG; de Vries HJ
PLoS One; 2012; 7(2):e32122. PubMed ID: 22393383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Use of multiple nucleic acid amplification tests to define the infected-patient "gold standard" in clinical trials of new diagnostic tests for Chlamydia trachomatis infections.
Martin DH; Nsuami M; Schachter J; Hook EW; Ferrero D; Quinn TC; Gaydos C
J Clin Microbiol; 2004 Oct; 42(10):4749-58. PubMed ID: 15472336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pitfalls of internet-accessible diagnostic tests: inadequate performance of a CE-marked Chlamydia test for home use.
Michel CE; Saison FG; Joshi H; Mahilum-Tapay LM; Lee HH
Sex Transm Infect; 2009 Jun; 85(3):187-9. PubMed ID: 19398434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of specimen order on Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae test performance and adequacy of Papanicolaou smear.
Ghanem KG; Koumans EH; Johnson RE; Sawyer MK; Papp JR; Unger ER; Black CM; Markowitz LE
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol; 2006 Feb; 19(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 16472725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Handilab C Chlamydia for home testing is not what it claims].
Moi H
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2007 Aug; 127(16):2083-5. PubMed ID: 17717571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Rapid point of care test for detecting urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in nonpregnant women and men at reproductive age.
Grillo-Ardila CF; Torres M; Gaitán HG
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2020 Jan; 1(1):CD011708. PubMed ID: 31995238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of one-sample testing of self-obtained vaginal swabs and first catch urine samples separately and in combination for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by two amplified DNA assays in women visiting a sexually transmitted disease clinic.
van Dommelen L; Dukers-Muijrers N; van Tiel FH; Brouwers EE; Hoebe CJ
Sex Transm Dis; 2011 Jun; 38(6):533-5. PubMed ID: 21217415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. High analytical sensitivity and low rates of inhibition may contribute to detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in significantly more women by the APTIMA Combo 2 assay.
Chernesky M; Jang D; Luinstra K; Chong S; Smieja M; Cai W; Hayhoe B; Portillo E; Macritchie C; Main C; Ewert R
J Clin Microbiol; 2006 Feb; 44(2):400-5. PubMed ID: 16455891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of rapid point-of-care tests for the detection of genital chlamydia infection in women and men.
Hislop J; Quayyum Z; Flett G; Boachie C; Fraser C; Mowatt G
Health Technol Assess; 2010 Jun; 14(29):1-97, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 20557810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Vaginal swabs are the optimal specimen for detection of genital Chlamydia trachomatis or Neisseria gonorrhoeae using the Cobas 4800 CT/NG test.
Van Der Pol B; Taylor SN; Liesenfeld O; Williams JA; Hook EW
Sex Transm Dis; 2013 Mar; 40(3):247-50. PubMed ID: 23407470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prospective comparison of cell cultures and nucleic acid amplification tests for laboratory diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis Infections.
Jespersen DJ; Flatten KS; Jones MF; Smith TF
J Clin Microbiol; 2005 Oct; 43(10):5324-6. PubMed ID: 16208009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Performance of urine leukocyte esterase in asymptomatic male youth: another look with nucleic acid amplification testing as the gold standard for Chlamydia detection.
Blake DR; Lemay CA; Gaydos CA; Quinn TC
J Adolesc Health; 2005 Apr; 36(4):337-41. PubMed ID: 15780789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinic-based evaluation of Clearview Chlamydia MF for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in vaginal and cervical specimens from women at high risk in China.
Yin YP; Peeling RW; Chen XS; Gong KL; Zhou H; Gu WM; Zheng HP; Wang ZS; Yong G; Cao WL; Shi MQ; Wei WH; Dai XQ; Gao X; Chen Q; Mabey D
Sex Transm Infect; 2006 Dec; 82 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):v33-7. PubMed ID: 17121763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Multicenter study of nucleic acid amplification tests for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in children being evaluated for sexual abuse.
Black CM; Driebe EM; Howard LA; Fajman NN; Sawyer MK; Girardet RG; Sautter RL; Greenwald E; Beck-Sague CM; Unger ER; Igietseme JU; Hammerschlag MR
Pediatr Infect Dis J; 2009 Jul; 28(7):608-13. PubMed ID: 19451856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Vulvovaginal-swab or first-catch urine specimen to detect Chlamydia trachomatis in women in a community setting?
Skidmore S; Horner P; Herring A; Sell J; Paul I; Thomas J; Caul EO; Egger M; McCarthy A; Sanford E; Salisbury C; Macleod J; Sterne JA; Low N;
J Clin Microbiol; 2006 Dec; 44(12):4389-94. PubMed ID: 17065268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of an enzymatic Chlamydia trachomatis point-of-care rapid assay in Rwanda: the BioChekSwab Rapid Test.
De Baetselier I; Mwambarangwe L; Cuylaerts V; Musengamana V; Agaba S; Kestelyn E; van de Wijgert J; Crucitti T
Sex Transm Infect; 2016 Sep; 92(6):430-2. PubMed ID: 26474600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Multicenter evaluation of the BDProbeTec ET System for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in urine specimens, female endocervical swabs, and male urethral swabs.
Van Der Pol B; Ferrero DV; Buck-Barrington L; Hook E; Lenderman C; Quinn T; Gaydos CA; Lovchik J; Schachter J; Moncada J; Hall G; Tuohy MJ; Jones RB
J Clin Microbiol; 2001 Mar; 39(3):1008-16. PubMed ID: 11230419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
