244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24339688)
1. Probing for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction in older children.
Eshragi B; Fard MA; Masomian B; Akbari M
Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol; 2013; 20(4):349-52. PubMed ID: 24339688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The results of late probing in congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
Zilelioğlu G; Hoşal BM
Orbit; 2007 Mar; 26(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 17510863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Factors affecting the success of nasolacrimal duct probing for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
Mannor GE; Rose GE; Frimpong-Ansah K; Ezra E
Am J Ophthalmol; 1999 May; 127(5):616-7. PubMed ID: 10334364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Outcome of probing for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction in older children.
Honavar SG; Prakash VE; Rao GN
Am J Ophthalmol; 2000 Jul; 130(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 11004258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Role of Inferior Turbinate Fracture in the Management of Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction.
Rajabi MT; Inanloo B; Salabati M; Rafizadeh M; Tabatabaie SZ; Bayat R; Mahmoudzadeh R
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019; 35(3):269-271. PubMed ID: 30234839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Endoscopic-assisted retrieval of retained lacrimal stent material in congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction without dacryocystorhinostomy.
Ng DS; Chan E; Tong FM; Chow SK; Ko ST
Orbit; 2016; 35(2):103-5. PubMed ID: 26838355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Success rate and cause of failure for late probing for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
Maheshwari R
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2008; 45(3):168-71. PubMed ID: 18524195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of Probing in Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction in Children Older Than 2 Years.
Une VL; Kulkarni SS; Nandedkar VS
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2019 May; 56(3):141-145. PubMed ID: 31116859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The management of nasolacrimal duct obstruction in children between 18 months and 4 years old.
Kushner BJ
J AAPOS; 1998 Feb; 2(1):57-60. PubMed ID: 10532369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Evaluation of therapy outcome in congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction in own material].
Lipiec E; Grałek M; Niwald A
Klin Oczna; 2006; 108(4-6):174-7. PubMed ID: 17019988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Initial nasolacrimal duct probing in children under age 5: cure rate and factors affecting success.
Kashkouli MB; Kassaee A; Tabatabaee Z
J AAPOS; 2002 Dec; 6(6):360-3. PubMed ID: 12506276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical outcomes of initial and repeated nasolacrimal duct office-based probing for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
Cha DS; Lee H; Park MS; Lee JM; Baek SH
Korean J Ophthalmol; 2010 Oct; 24(5):261-6. PubMed ID: 21052504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Nasolacrimal Duct Probing under Topical Anesthesia for Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction in Taiwan.
Hung CH; Chen YC; Lin SL; Chen WL
Pediatr Neonatol; 2015 Dec; 56(6):402-7. PubMed ID: 26026949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction: irrigation or probing?
Kim YS; Moon SC; Yoo KW
Korean J Ophthalmol; 2000 Dec; 14(2):90-6. PubMed ID: 11213741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Office probing for treatment of nasolacrimal duct obstruction in infants.
Miller AM; Chandler DL; Repka MX; Hoover DL; Lee KA; Melia M; Rychwalski PJ; Silbert DI; ; Beck RW; Crouch ER; Donahue S; Holmes JM; Quinn GE; Sala NA; Schloff S; Wallace DK; Foster NC; Frick KD; Golden RP; Lambert SR; Tien DR; Weakley DR
J AAPOS; 2014 Feb; 18(1):26-30. PubMed ID: 24568978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Inferior turbinate fracture and congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
Attarzadeh A; Sajjadi M; Owji N; Reza Talebnejad M; Farvardin M; Attarzadeh A
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2006; 16(4):520-4. PubMed ID: 16952088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Efficacy of probing for children with congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction: a retrospective study using fluorescein dye disappearance test and lacrimal sac echography.
Steindler P; Mantovani E; Incorvaia C; Parmeggiani F
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2009 Jun; 247(6):837-46. PubMed ID: 19107503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pushed monocanalicular intubation versus probing for the treatment of simple and incomplete complex types of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction in children older than 18 months old.
Eshraghi B; Khalilipour E; Ameli K; Bazvand F; Mirmohammadsadeghi A
Orbit; 2017 Aug; 36(4):218-222. PubMed ID: 28627958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intraoperative prognostic factors for probing outcome in children with congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
Andalib D; Nabei R
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2013; 23(3):329-32. PubMed ID: 23225091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Success rate of late primary probing in congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
Rajabi MT; Abrishami Y; Hosseini SS; Tabatabaee SZ; Rajabi MB; Hurwitz JJ
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2014; 51(6):360-2. PubMed ID: 25215516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
