These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24339895)

  • 1. A function accounting for training set size and marker density to model the average accuracy of genomic prediction.
    Erbe M; Gredler B; Seefried FR; Bapst B; Simianer H
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(12):e81046. PubMed ID: 24339895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of genomic predictions in Gyr (Bos indicus) dairy cattle.
    Boison SA; Utsunomiya ATH; Santos DJA; Neves HHR; Carvalheiro R; Mészáros G; Utsunomiya YT; do Carmo AS; Verneque RS; Machado MA; Panetto JCC; Garcia JF; Sölkner J; da Silva MVGB
    J Dairy Sci; 2017 Jul; 100(7):5479-5490. PubMed ID: 28527809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A deterministic equation to predict the accuracy of multi-population genomic prediction with multiple genomic relationship matrices.
    Raymond B; Wientjes YCJ; Bouwman AC; Schrooten C; Veerkamp RF
    Genet Sel Evol; 2020 Apr; 52(1):21. PubMed ID: 32345213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improving accuracy of genomic predictions within and between dairy cattle breeds with imputed high-density single nucleotide polymorphism panels.
    Erbe M; Hayes BJ; Matukumalli LK; Goswami S; Bowman PJ; Reich CM; Mason BA; Goddard ME
    J Dairy Sci; 2012 Jul; 95(7):4114-29. PubMed ID: 22720968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of genomic predictions using genomic relationship matrices built with different weighting factors to account for locus-specific variances.
    Su G; Christensen OF; Janss L; Lund MS
    J Dairy Sci; 2014 Oct; 97(10):6547-59. PubMed ID: 25129495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Efficiency of multi-breed genomic selection for dairy cattle breeds with different sizes of reference population.
    Hozé C; Fritz S; Phocas F; Boichard D; Ducrocq V; Croiseau P
    J Dairy Sci; 2014; 97(6):3918-29. PubMed ID: 24704232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Value of sharing cow reference population between countries on reliability of genomic prediction for milk yield traits.
    Haile-Mariam M; MacLeod IM; Bolormaa S; Schrooten C; O'Connor E; de Jong G; Daetwyler HD; Pryce JE
    J Dairy Sci; 2020 Feb; 103(2):1711-1728. PubMed ID: 31864746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contribution of domestic production records, Interbull estimated breeding values, and single nucleotide polymorphism genetic markers to the single-step genomic evaluation of milk production.
    Přibyl J; Madsen P; Bauer J; Přibylová J; Simečková M; Vostrý L; Zavadilová L
    J Dairy Sci; 2013 Mar; 96(3):1865-73. PubMed ID: 23312993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Genomic predictions based on a joint reference population for the Nordic Red cattle breeds.
    Zhou L; Heringstad B; Su G; Guldbrandtsen B; Meuwissen TH; Svendsen M; Grove H; Nielsen US; Lund MS
    J Dairy Sci; 2014 Jul; 97(7):4485-96. PubMed ID: 24792791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of genomic predictions using medium-density (∼54,000) and high-density (∼777,000) single nucleotide polymorphism marker panels in Nordic Holstein and Red Dairy Cattle populations.
    Su G; Brøndum RF; Ma P; Guldbrandtsen B; Aamand GP; Lund MS
    J Dairy Sci; 2012 Aug; 95(8):4657-65. PubMed ID: 22818480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of five methods to predict genomic breeding values of dairy bulls from genome-wide SNP markers.
    Moser G; Tier B; Crump RE; Khatkar MS; Raadsma HW
    Genet Sel Evol; 2009 Dec; 41(1):56. PubMed ID: 20043835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Genomic prediction using imputed whole-genome sequence data in Holstein Friesian cattle.
    van Binsbergen R; Calus MP; Bink MC; van Eeuwijk FA; Schrooten C; Veerkamp RF
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Sep; 47(1):71. PubMed ID: 26381777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of prediction of simulated polygenic phenotypes and their underlying quantitative trait loci genotypes using real or imputed whole-genome markers in cattle.
    Hassani S; Saatchi M; Fernando RL; Garrick DJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Dec; 47():99. PubMed ID: 26698091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of Genomic Prediction in Synthetic Populations Depending on the Number of Parents, Relatedness, and Ancestral Linkage Disequilibrium.
    Schopp P; Müller D; Technow F; Melchinger AE
    Genetics; 2017 Jan; 205(1):441-454. PubMed ID: 28049710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genomic breeding values, SNP effects and gene identification for disease traits in cow training sets.
    Naderi S; Bohlouli M; Yin T; König S
    Anim Genet; 2018 Jun; 49(3):178-192. PubMed ID: 29624705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genomic predictions for economically important traits in Brazilian Braford and Hereford beef cattle using true and imputed genotypes.
    Piccoli ML; Brito LF; Braccini J; Cardoso FF; Sargolzaei M; Schenkel FS
    BMC Genet; 2017 Jan; 18(1):2. PubMed ID: 28100165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Empirical and deterministic accuracies of across-population genomic prediction.
    Wientjes YC; Veerkamp RF; Bijma P; Bovenhuis H; Schrooten C; Calus MP
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Feb; 47(1):5. PubMed ID: 25885467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Random forest estimation of genomic breeding values for disease susceptibility over different disease incidences and genomic architectures in simulated cow calibration groups.
    Naderi S; Yin T; König S
    J Dairy Sci; 2016 Sep; 99(9):7261-7273. PubMed ID: 27344385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Genetic parameters and genomic breeding values for digital dermatitis in Holstein Friesian dairy cattle: host susceptibility, infectivity and the basic reproduction ratio.
    Biemans F; de Jong MCM; Bijma P
    Genet Sel Evol; 2019 Nov; 51(1):67. PubMed ID: 31747869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Whole-genome sequence-based genomic prediction in laying chickens with different genomic relationship matrices to account for genetic architecture.
    Ni G; Cavero D; Fangmann A; Erbe M; Simianer H
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Jan; 49(1):8. PubMed ID: 28093063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.