These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24340800)

  • 1. Parity influences the difficulty of simple addition and subtraction but not multiplication problems in children.
    Hines TM
    Psychol Rep; 2013 Aug; 113(1):1048-65. PubMed ID: 24340800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bad-good constraints on a polarity correspondence account for the spatial-numerical association of response codes (SNARC) and markedness association of response codes (MARC) effects.
    Leth-Steensen C; Citta R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(3):482-94. PubMed ID: 26213330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Embodied markedness of parity? Examining handedness effects on parity judgments.
    Huber S; Klein E; Graf M; Nuerk HC; Moeller K; Willmes K
    Psychol Res; 2015 Nov; 79(6):963-77. PubMed ID: 25394996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Concept-procedure interactions in children's addition and subtraction.
    Canobi KH
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2009 Feb; 102(2):131-49. PubMed ID: 18809182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On the dependency of division on multiplication: selective loss for conceptual knowledge of multiplication.
    Venneri A; Semenza C
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Nov; 49(13):3629-35. PubMed ID: 21945807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The association between children's numerical magnitude processing and mental multi-digit subtraction.
    Linsen S; Verschaffel L; Reynvoet B; De Smedt B
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Jan; 145():75-83. PubMed ID: 24296255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The relationship between non-symbolic multiplication and division in childhood.
    McCrink K; Shafto P; Barth H
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Apr; 70(4):686-702. PubMed ID: 26880261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The impact of visuo-spatial number forms on simple arithmetic.
    Ward J; Sagiv N; Butterworth B
    Cortex; 2009; 45(10):1261-5. PubMed ID: 19631317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How specifically do we learn? Imaging the learning of multiplication and subtraction.
    Ischebeck A; Zamarian L; Siedentopf C; Koppelstätter F; Benke T; Felber S; Delazer M
    Neuroimage; 2006 May; 30(4):1365-75. PubMed ID: 16413795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Arithmetic word problem solving: a Situation Strategy First framework.
    Brissiaud R; Sander E
    Dev Sci; 2010 Jan; 13(1):92-107. PubMed ID: 20121866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. When is an odd number not odd? Influence of task rule on the MARC effect for numeric classification.
    Cho YS; Proctor RW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Sep; 33(5):832-42. PubMed ID: 17723063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Selective impairment as evidence for mental organisation of arithmetical facts: BB, a case of preserved subtraction?
    Pesenti M; Seron X; van der Linden M
    Cortex; 1994 Dec; 30(4):661-71. PubMed ID: 7697989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Inverse reference in subtraction performance: an analysis from arithmetic word problems.
    Orrantia J; Rodríguez L; Múñez D; Vicente S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(4):725-38. PubMed ID: 22335275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does the semantic activation of quantity representations influence motor parameters?
    Fischer R; Miller J
    Exp Brain Res; 2008 Aug; 189(4):379-91. PubMed ID: 18521582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Negative numbers in simple arithmetic.
    Das R; LeFevre JA; Penner-Wilger M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Oct; 63(10):1943-52. PubMed ID: 20155575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A microgenetic study of the multiplication and division inversion concept.
    Robinson KM; Dubé AK
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2009 Sep; 63(3):193-200. PubMed ID: 19739902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The use of procedural knowledge in simple addition and subtraction problems.
    Fayol M; Thevenot C
    Cognition; 2012 Jun; 123(3):392-403. PubMed ID: 22405923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A longitudinal study of children's performance on simple multiplication and division problems.
    De Brauwer J; Fias W
    Dev Psychol; 2009 Sep; 45(5):1480-96. PubMed ID: 19702407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The organization of arithmetic facts in memory: evidence from a brain-damaged patient.
    Dagenbach D; McCloskey M
    Brain Cogn; 1992 Nov; 20(2):345-66. PubMed ID: 1449763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Age-independent and age-dependent neural substrate for single-digit multiplication and addition arithmetic problems.
    Zhou X; Booth JR; Lu J; Zhao H; Butterworth B; Chen C; Dong Q
    Dev Neuropsychol; 2011; 36(3):338-52. PubMed ID: 21462011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.