These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24340802)

  • 1. Reactions of religious fundamentalists to taboo images and words.
    Bates LW; Hudiburg RA; Lauderdale EP; Castillo JR
    Psychol Rep; 2013 Aug; 113(1):1085-108. PubMed ID: 24340802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Disentangling fast and slow attentional influences of negative and taboo spoken words in the emotional Stroop paradigm.
    Bertels J; Kolinsky R
    Cogn Emot; 2016 Sep; 30(6):1137-48. PubMed ID: 26197360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Aging, Emotion, Attention, and Binding in the Taboo Stroop Task: Data and Theories.
    MacKay DG; Johnson LW; Graham ER; Burke DM
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2015 Oct; 12(10):12803-33. PubMed ID: 26473909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Neuromodulation of cursing in American English: A combined tDCS and pupillometry study.
    Reilly J; Zuckerman B; Kelly A; Flurie M; Rao S
    Brain Lang; 2020 Jul; 206():104791. PubMed ID: 32339951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effects of taboo-related distraction on driving performance.
    Chan M; Madan CR; Singhal A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Jul; 168():20-6. PubMed ID: 27136396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hearing taboo words can result in early talker effects in word recognition for female listeners.
    Tuft SE; MᶜLennan CT; Krestar ML
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Feb; 71(2):435-448. PubMed ID: 27784198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Long-lasting attentional influence of negative and taboo words in an auditory variant of the emotional Stroop task.
    Bertels J; Kolinsky R; Pietrons E; Morais J
    Emotion; 2011 Feb; 11(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 21401222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dutch taboo norms.
    Roest SA; Visser TA; Zeelenberg R
    Behav Res Methods; 2018 Apr; 50(2):630-641. PubMed ID: 28409486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Relations between emotion, memory, and attention: evidence from taboo stroop, lexical decision, and immediate memory tasks.
    MacKay DG; Shafto M; Taylor JK; Marian DE; Abrams L; Dyer JR
    Mem Cognit; 2004 Apr; 32(3):474-88. PubMed ID: 15285130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The influence of autonomic arousal and semantic relatedness on memory for emotional words.
    Buchanan TW; Etzel JA; Adolphs R; Tranel D
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Jul; 61(1):26-33. PubMed ID: 16427713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Religious bias among religiously conscious black christians in the United States.
    Van Camp D; Sloan LR; Elbassiouny A
    J Soc Psychol; 2014; 154(1):4-7. PubMed ID: 24689332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Age differences in vulnerability to distraction under arousal.
    Gallant SN; Durbin KA; Mather M
    Psychol Aging; 2020 Aug; 35(5):780-791. PubMed ID: 32744858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Exploring the existential function of religion: the effect of religious fundamentalism and mortality salience on faith-based medical refusals.
    Vess M; Arndt J; Cox CR; Routledge C; Goldenberg JL
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2009 Aug; 97(2):334-50. PubMed ID: 19634979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [The effect of taboo word on language processing].
    Huszár T; Makra E; Hallgató E; Janacsek K; Németh D
    Psychiatr Hung; 2010; 25(6):525-37. PubMed ID: 21300999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Attentional capture by taboo words: A functional view of auditory distraction.
    Röer JP; Körner U; Buchner A; Bell R
    Emotion; 2017 Jun; 17(4):740-750. PubMed ID: 28080086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Time flies when we read taboo words.
    Tipples J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2010 Aug; 17(4):563-8. PubMed ID: 20702878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Shock and awe: Distinct effects of taboo words on lexical decision and free recall.
    Madan CR; Shafer AT; Chan M; Singhal A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Apr; 70(4):793-810. PubMed ID: 27003746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does emotion help or hinder immediate memory? Arousal versus priority-binding mechanisms.
    Hadley CB; Mackay DG
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jan; 32(1):79-88. PubMed ID: 16478342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Lack of habituation to shocking words: the attentional bias to their spatial origin is context free.
    Bertels J; Kolinsky R; Morais J
    Cogn Emot; 2012; 26(8):1345-58. PubMed ID: 22432532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. When does reading dirty words impede picture processing? Taboo interference with verbal and manual responses.
    Mädebach A; Markuske AM; Jescheniak JD
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Dec; 25(6):2301-2308. PubMed ID: 29790121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.