These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24340803)

  • 21. Makeup applied to facial features increases perceived skin evenness.
    Batres C; Russell R; Workowski M
    Vision Res; 2023 Jan; 202():108144. PubMed ID: 36410263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Facial cosmetics have little effect on attractiveness judgments compared with identity.
    Jones AL; Kramer SS
    Perception; 2015; 44(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 26489218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Is moral beauty different from facial beauty? Evidence from an fMRI study.
    Wang T; Mo L; Mo C; Tan LH; Cant JS; Zhong L; Cupchik G
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2015 Jun; 10(6):814-23. PubMed ID: 25298010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Neural time course and brain sources of facial attractiveness vs. trustworthiness judgment.
    Calvo MG; Gutiérrez-García A; Beltrán D
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2018 Dec; 18(6):1233-1247. PubMed ID: 30187360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of averageness and sexual dimorphism on the judgment of facial attractiveness.
    Komori M; Kawamura S; Ishihara S
    Vision Res; 2009 Mar; 49(8):862-9. PubMed ID: 19285521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The impact of no-makeup selfies on young women's body image.
    Fardouly J; Rapee RM
    Body Image; 2019 Mar; 28():128-134. PubMed ID: 30665030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The Role of Regional Contrast Changes and Asymmetry in Facial Attractiveness Related to Cosmetic Use.
    Killian AC; Mitra S; Peissig JJ
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():2448. PubMed ID: 30618914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Eyelid-openness and mouth curvature influence perceived intelligence beyond attractiveness.
    Talamas SN; Mavor KI; Axelsson J; Sundelin T; Perrett DI
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2016 May; 145(5):603-620. PubMed ID: 26913618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Differential effects of makeup on perceived age.
    Russell R; Batres C; Courrèges S; Kaminski G; Soppelsa F; Morizot F; Porcheron A
    Br J Psychol; 2019 Feb; 110(1):87-100. PubMed ID: 30073658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Computational models of facial attractiveness judgments.
    Bronstad PM; Langlois JH; Russell R
    Perception; 2008; 37(1):126-42. PubMed ID: 18399252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Makeup and Its Application Simulation Affect Women's Self-Perceptions.
    Anchieta NM; Mafra AL; Hokama RT; Varella MAC; Melo JA; da Silva LO; da Silva CSA; Valentova JV
    Arch Sex Behav; 2021 Nov; 50(8):3777-3784. PubMed ID: 34741247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A sex difference in facial contrast and its exaggeration by cosmetics.
    Russell R
    Perception; 2009; 38(8):1211-9. PubMed ID: 19817153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. How Does Ambivalence Appear in Women's Relationship to Cosmetics?
    Spezzacatena M; Marsico G
    Integr Psychol Behav Sci; 2021 Mar; 55(1):128-166. PubMed ID: 32812207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparing theory-driven and data-driven attractiveness models using images of real women's faces.
    Holzleitner IJ; Lee AJ; Hahn AC; Kandrik M; Bovet J; Renoult JP; Simmons D; Garrod O; DeBruine LM; Jones BC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Dec; 45(12):1589-1595. PubMed ID: 31556686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Appearance of symmetry, beauty, and health in human faces.
    Zaidel DW; Aarde SM; Baig K
    Brain Cogn; 2005 Apr; 57(3):261-3. PubMed ID: 15780460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Judging the health and attractiveness of female faces: is the most attractive level of facial adiposity also considered the healthiest?
    Coetzee V; Re D; Perrett DI; Tiddeman BP; Xiao D
    Body Image; 2011 Mar; 8(2):190-3. PubMed ID: 21354874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Simultaneous perceptual and response biases on sequential face attractiveness judgments.
    Pegors TK; Mattar MG; Bryan PB; Epstein RA
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2015 Jun; 144(3):664-73. PubMed ID: 25867223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Are drivers' comparative risk judgments about speeding realistic?
    Delhomme P; Verlhiac JF; Martha C
    J Safety Res; 2009 Oct; 40(5):333-9. PubMed ID: 19932313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Barely legal: is attraction and estimated age of young female faces disrupted by alcohol use, make up, and the sex of the observer?
    Egan V; Cordan G
    Br J Psychol; 2009 May; 100(Pt 2):415-27. PubMed ID: 18851766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Good conduct makes your face attractive: The effect of personality perception on facial attractiveness judgments.
    Niimi R; Goto M
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(2):e0281758. PubMed ID: 36780462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.