These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24341319)

  • 1. A little bias goes a long way: the effects of feedback on the strategic regulation of accuracy on formula-scored tests.
    Arnold MM; Higham PA; Martín-Luengo B
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2013 Dec; 19(4):383-402. PubMed ID: 24341319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of a 'don't know' option on test scores: number-right and formula scoring compared.
    Muijtjens AM; Mameren HV; Hoogenboom RJ; Evers JL; van der Vleuten CP
    Med Educ; 1999 Apr; 33(4):267-75. PubMed ID: 10336757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Penalties in multiple-choice and true-false questions.
    Koeslag JH; Melzer CW; Schach SR
    S Afr Med J; 1983 Jan; 63(1):20-2. PubMed ID: 6849146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Using verification feedback to correct errors made on a multiple-choice test.
    Marsh EJ; Lozito JP; Umanath S; Bjork EL; Bjork RA
    Memory; 2012; 20(6):645-53. PubMed ID: 22640417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Task- versus ego-oriented feedback delivered as numbers or comments during intubation training.
    Manzone J; Tremblay L; You-Ten KE; Desai D; Brydges R
    Med Educ; 2014 Apr; 48(4):430-40. PubMed ID: 24606626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Answer changing in multiple choice assessment change that answer when in doubt--and spread the word!
    Bauer D; Kopp V; Fischer MR
    BMC Med Educ; 2007 Aug; 7():28. PubMed ID: 17718902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of posting examinations and answer keys on students' study methods and test performance.
    Lake E; Chambers DW
    J Dent Educ; 2009 May; 73(5):601-13. PubMed ID: 19433535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of item feedback on multiple-choice test responses.
    Delgado AR; Prieto G
    Br J Psychol; 2003 Feb; 94(Pt 1):73-85. PubMed ID: 12648390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Feedback, test anxiety and performance in a college course.
    Clark JW; Fox PA; Schneider HG
    Psychol Rep; 1998 Feb; 82(1):203-8. PubMed ID: 9520555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Effect of Type of Feedback in Multiple-Choice Testing on Long-Term Retention.
    Jang Y; Marshall E
    J Gen Psychol; 2018; 145(2):107-119. PubMed ID: 29547068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. No special K! A signal detection framework for the strategic regulation of memory accuracy.
    Higham PA
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2007 Feb; 136(1):1-22. PubMed ID: 17324082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Rasch techniques for detecting bias in performance assessments: an example comparing the performance of native and non-native speakers on a test of academic English.
    Elder C; McNamara T; Congdon P
    J Appl Meas; 2003; 4(2):181-97. PubMed ID: 12748409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of self-assessment on test scores: student perceptions.
    Ramirez BU
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2010 Sep; 34(3):134-6. PubMed ID: 20826767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Correcting for guessing increases validity in multiple-choice examinations in an oral and maxillofacial pathology course.
    Prihoda TJ; Pinckard RN; McMahan CA; Jones AC
    J Dent Educ; 2006 Apr; 70(4):378-86. PubMed ID: 16595530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Improving multiple-choice questions to better assess dental student knowledge: distractor utilization in oral and maxillofacial pathology course examinations.
    McMahan CA; Pinckard RN; Prihoda TJ; Hendricson WD; Jones AC
    J Dent Educ; 2013 Dec; 77(12):1593-609. PubMed ID: 24319131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Feedback reduces the metacognitive benefit of tests.
    Kornell N; Rhodes MG
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2013 Mar; 19(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 23544472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Does student confidence on multiple-choice question assessments provide useful information?
    Curtis DA; Lind SL; Boscardin CK; Dellinges M
    Med Educ; 2013 Jun; 47(6):578-84. PubMed ID: 23662875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Immediate detailed feedback to test-enhanced learning: an effective online educational tool.
    Wojcikowski K; Kirk L
    Med Teach; 2013 Nov; 35(11):915-9. PubMed ID: 24003913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prospective implementation of correction for guessing in oral and maxillofacial pathology multiple-choice examinations: did student performance improve?
    Prihoda TJ; Pinckard RN; McMahan CA; Littlefield JH; Jones AC
    J Dent Educ; 2008 Oct; 72(10):1149-59. PubMed ID: 18923095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Method for calculating the distribution of randomly expected scores in a false-true-do not know-type of test].
    Pérez-Padilla JR; Viniegra Velázquez L
    Rev Invest Clin; 1989; 41(4):375-9. PubMed ID: 2631171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.