These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24341354)

  • 1. Comparison of the shaping ability of GT® Series X, Twisted Files and AlphaKite rotary nickel-titanium systems in simulated canals.
    Ba-Hattab R; Pröhl AK; Lang H; Pahncke D
    BMC Oral Health; 2013 Dec; 13():72. PubMed ID: 24341354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Geometric analysis of root canals prepared by four rotary NiTi shaping systems.
    Hashem AA; Ghoneim AG; Lutfy RA; Foda MY; Omar GA
    J Endod; 2012 Jul; 38(7):996-1000. PubMed ID: 22703669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of the root canal shaping ability of two rotary nickel-titanium systems.
    Al-Manei KK; Al-Hadlaq SM
    Int Endod J; 2014 Oct; 47(10):974-9. PubMed ID: 24387043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative study of six rotary nickel-titanium systems and hand instrumentation for root canal preparation.
    Guelzow A; Stamm O; Martus P; Kielbassa AM
    Int Endod J; 2005 Oct; 38(10):743-52. PubMed ID: 16164689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A reconstructed computerized tomographic comparison of Ni-Ti rotary GT files versus traditional instruments in canals shaped by novice operators.
    Gluskin AH; Brown DC; Buchanan LS
    Int Endod J; 2001 Sep; 34(6):476-84. PubMed ID: 11556516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparative study of root canal preparation with NiTi-TEE and K3 rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
    Jodway B; Hülsmann M
    Int Endod J; 2006 Jan; 39(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 16409331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Shaping ability of two rotary instruments in simulated canals: stainless steel ENDOflash and nickel-titanium HERO Shaper.
    Perez F; Schoumacher M; Peli JF
    Int Endod J; 2005 Sep; 38(9):637-44. PubMed ID: 16104977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Shaping ability of two M-wire and two traditional nickel-titanium instrumentation systems in S-shaped resin canals.
    Ceyhanli KT; Kamaci A; Taner M; Erdilek N; Celik D
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2015; 18(6):713-7. PubMed ID: 26289506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative study of 6 rotary nickel-titanium systems and hand instrumentation for root canal preparation in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
    Celik D; Taşdemir T; Er K
    J Endod; 2013 Feb; 39(2):278-82. PubMed ID: 23321246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Root Canal Surface Strain and Canal Center Transportation Induced by 3 Different Nickel-Titanium Rotary Instrument Systems.
    Liu W; Wu B
    J Endod; 2016 Feb; 42(2):299-303. PubMed ID: 26686822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fatigue resistance of engine-driven rotary nickel-titanium instruments produced by new manufacturing methods.
    Gambarini G; Grande NM; Plotino G; Somma F; Garala M; De Luca M; Testarelli L
    J Endod; 2008 Aug; 34(8):1003-5. PubMed ID: 18634935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparative study of root canal preparation using Profile .04 and Lightspeed rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
    Versümer J; Hülsmann M; Schäfers F
    Int Endod J; 2002 Jan; 35(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 11853237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cyclic fatigue testing and metallographic analysis of nickel-titanium rotary instruments.
    Pirani C; Cirulli PP; Chersoni S; Micele L; Ruggeri O; Prati C
    J Endod; 2011 Jul; 37(7):1013-6. PubMed ID: 21689562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 1. Shaping ability in simulated curved canals.
    Schäfer E; Vlassis M
    Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):229-38. PubMed ID: 15056349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of three nickel titanium instrument systems on root canal geometry assessed by micro-computed tomography.
    Gergi R; Osta N; Bourbouze G; Zgheib C; Arbab-Chirani R; Naaman A
    Int Endod J; 2015 Feb; 48(2):162-70. PubMed ID: 24717063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of the shaping abilities of 4 nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated root canals.
    Yun HH; Kim SK
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Feb; 95(2):228-33. PubMed ID: 12582365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Efficiency of rotary nickel-titanium K3 instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-Flexofile. Part 1. Shaping ability in simulated curved canals.
    Schäfer E; Florek H
    Int Endod J; 2003 Mar; 36(3):199-207. PubMed ID: 12657146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficiency of rotary nickel-titanium K3 instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-Flexofile. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
    Schäfer E; Schlingemann R
    Int Endod J; 2003 Mar; 36(3):208-17. PubMed ID: 12657147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ex vivo study on root canal instrumentation of two rotary nickel-titanium systems in comparison to stainless steel hand instruments.
    Vaudt J; Bitter K; Neumann K; Kielbassa AM
    Int Endod J; 2009 Jan; 42(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 19125977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of different types of automated devices on the shaping ability of rotary nickel-titanium FlexMaster instruments.
    Schäfer E; Erler M; Dammaschke T
    Int Endod J; 2005 Sep; 38(9):627-36. PubMed ID: 16104976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.