148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24341747)
1. Comparison between clinical and digital soft tissue measurements.
Schneider D; Ender A; Truninger T; Leutert C; Sahrmann P; Roos M; Schmidlin P
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2014; 26(3):191-9. PubMed ID: 24341747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The accuracy and reliability of digital measurements of gingival recession versus conventional methods.
Fageeh HN; Meshni AA; Jamal HA; Preethanath RS; Halboub E
BMC Oral Health; 2019 Jul; 19(1):154. PubMed ID: 31311544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy and reproducibility of dental replica models reconstructed by different rapid prototyping techniques.
Hazeveld A; Huddleston Slater JJ; Ren Y
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jan; 145(1):108-15. PubMed ID: 24373661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The gingival biotype revisited: transparency of the periodontal probe through the gingival margin as a method to discriminate thin from thick gingiva.
De Rouck T; Eghbali R; Collys K; De Bruyn H; Cosyn J
J Clin Periodontol; 2009 May; 36(5):428-33. PubMed ID: 19419444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A novel method for evaluating periodontal recession: a feasibility study.
Lehmann KM; Kasaj A; Ross A; Willershausen I; Schmidtmann I; Staedt H; Scheller H
Int J Comput Dent; 2011; 14(4):297-307. PubMed ID: 22324221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Tunnel technique with connective tissue graft versus coronally advanced flap with enamel matrix derivative for root coverage: a RCT using 3D digital measuring methods. Part II. Volumetric studies on healing dynamics and gingival dimensions.
Rebele SF; Zuhr O; Schneider D; Jung RE; Hürzeler MB
J Clin Periodontol; 2014 Jun; 41(6):593-603. PubMed ID: 24708338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The reliability of Little's Irregularity Index for the upper dental arch using three dimensional (3D) digital models.
Burns A; Dowling AH; Garvey TM; Fleming GJ
J Dent; 2014 Oct; 42(10):1320-6. PubMed ID: 25064042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Coronally advanced flap procedure: is the interdental papilla a prognostic factor for root coverage?
Saletta D; Pini Prato G; Pagliaro U; Baldi C; Mauri M; Nieri M
J Periodontol; 2001 Jun; 72(6):760-6. PubMed ID: 11453238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The accuracy of a 3-D laser scanner for crown width measurements.
Nouri M; Massudi R; Bagheban AA; Azimi S; Fereidooni F
Aust Orthod J; 2009 May; 25(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 19634463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of space analysis evaluations with digital models and plaster dental casts.
Leifert MF; Leifert MM; Efstratiadis SS; Cangialosi TJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):16.e1-4; discussion 16. PubMed ID: 19577140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ultrasonic determination of gingival thickness. Subject variation and influence of tooth type and clinical features.
Eger T; Müller HP; Heinecke A
J Clin Periodontol; 1996 Sep; 23(9):839-45. PubMed ID: 8891935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A new method for volumetric evaluation of gingival recessions: a feasibility study.
Lehmann KM; Kasaj A; Ross A; Kämmerer PW; Wagner W; Scheller H
J Periodontol; 2012 Jan; 83(1):50-4. PubMed ID: 21563950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Tunnel technique with connective tissue graft versus coronally advanced flap with enamel matrix derivative for root coverage: a RCT using 3D digital measuring methods. Part I. Clinical and patient-centred outcomes.
Zuhr O; Rebele SF; Schneider D; Jung RE; Hürzeler MB
J Clin Periodontol; 2014 Jun; 41(6):582-92. PubMed ID: 24117676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validity, reliability and reproducibility of three methods used to measure tooth widths for bolton analyses.
Naidu D; Scott J; Ong D; Ho CT
Aust Orthod J; 2009 Nov; 25(2):97-103. PubMed ID: 20043542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reproducibility and accuracy of linear measurements on dental models derived from cone-beam computed tomography compared with digital dental casts.
de Waard O; Rangel FA; Fudalej PS; Bronkhorst EM; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; Breuning KH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Sep; 146(3):328-36. PubMed ID: 25172255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reproducibility and accuracy of automated probe measurements of gingiva and bone levels on stone casts following guided bone regeneration treatment.
Van der Zee E; Vogels MF; Oosterveld P; Van Waas M
J Clin Periodontol; 2004 Apr; 31(4):318-23. PubMed ID: 15016261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of standardization on the precision (reproducibility) of dental cast analysis with virtual 3-dimensional models.
Hayashi K; Chung O; Park S; Lee SP; Sachdeva RC; Mizoguchi I
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Mar; 147(3):373-80. PubMed ID: 25726405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of gingival recessions with conventional versus digital methods.
Kuralt M; Cmok Kučič A; Gašperšič R; Fidler A
J Dent; 2022 May; 120():104093. PubMed ID: 35301080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reliability and validity of intraoral and extraoral scanners.
Jacob HB; Wyatt GD; Buschang PH
Prog Orthod; 2015; 16():38. PubMed ID: 26506832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A quantitative evaluation of the spatial displacement of the gingival zenith in the maxillary anterior dentition.
Mattos CM; Santana RB
J Periodontol; 2008 Oct; 79(10):1880-5. PubMed ID: 18834242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
