762 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24342118)
1. [Does endoscopist fatigue play a role in incomplete colonoscopies and detection of polypoid lesions?].
Borda F; Borda A; Jiménez FJ; Fernández-Urién I; Vila JJ; Zozaya JM
Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2014 Jan; 37(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 24342118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Adenoma detection rate is not influenced by the timing of colonoscopy when performed in half-day blocks.
Gurudu SR; Ratuapli SK; Leighton JA; Heigh RI; Crowell MD
Am J Gastroenterol; 2011 Aug; 106(8):1466-71. PubMed ID: 21502998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Adenoma and sessile serrated polyp detection rates: variation by patient sex and colonic segment but not specialty of the endoscopist.
Sanaka MR; Gohel T; Podugu A; Kiran RP; Thota PN; Lopez R; Church JM; Burke CA
Dis Colon Rectum; 2014 Sep; 57(9):1113-9. PubMed ID: 25101608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Adenoma detection rate is not influenced by full-day blocks, time, or modified queue position.
Lurix E; Hernandez AV; Thoma M; Castro F
Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Apr; 75(4):827-34. PubMed ID: 22321696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prevalence and variable detection of proximal colon serrated polyps during screening colonoscopy.
Kahi CJ; Hewett DG; Norton DL; Eckert GJ; Rex DK
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2011 Jan; 9(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 20888435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Queue position in the endoscopic schedule impacts effectiveness of colonoscopy.
Lee A; Iskander JM; Gupta N; Borg BB; Zuckerman G; Banerjee B; Gyawali CP
Am J Gastroenterol; 2011 Aug; 106(8):1457-65. PubMed ID: 21448145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Time of day variation in polyp detection rate for colonoscopies performed on a 3-hour shift schedule.
Munson GW; Harewood GC; Francis DL
Gastrointest Endosc; 2011 Mar; 73(3):467-75. PubMed ID: 20933230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Advanced adenoma in 3700 colonoscopies].
Barreda Costa C; Vila Gutierrez S; Salazar Cabrera F; Barriga Calle E; Velarde Criado H; Barriga Briceño J
Rev Gastroenterol Peru; 2010; 30(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 20644602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Colonoscopy scheduling influences adenoma and polyp detection rates.
Paeck KH; Heo WJ; Park DI; Kim YH; Lee SH; Lee CK; Eun CS; Han DS
Hepatogastroenterology; 2013 Oct; 60(127):1647-52. PubMed ID: 24634936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Detection rate and proximal shift tendency of adenomas and serrated polyps: a retrospective study of 62,560 colonoscopies.
Chen S; Sun K; Chao K; Sun Y; Hong L; Weng Z; Cui Y; Chen M; Zhang S
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2018 Feb; 33(2):131-139. PubMed ID: 29282495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Trainee participation is associated with increased small adenoma detection.
Buchner AM; Shahid MW; Heckman MG; Diehl NN; McNeil RB; Cleveland P; Gill KR; Schore A; Ghabril M; Raimondo M; Gross SA; Wallace MB
Gastrointest Endosc; 2011 Jun; 73(6):1223-31. PubMed ID: 21481861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of experience with a retrograde-viewing device on adenoma detection rates and withdrawal times during colonoscopy: the Third Eye Retroscope study group.
DeMarco DC; Odstrcil E; Lara LF; Bass D; Herdman C; Kinney T; Gupta K; Wolf L; Dewar T; Deas TM; Mehta MK; Anwer MB; Pellish R; Hamilton JK; Polter D; Reddy KG; Hanan I
Gastrointest Endosc; 2010 Mar; 71(3):542-50. PubMed ID: 20189513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Endoscopic detection of proximal serrated lesions and pathologic identification of sessile serrated adenomas/polyps vary on the basis of center.
Payne SR; Church TR; Wandell M; Rösch T; Osborn N; Snover D; Day RW; Ransohoff DF; Rex DK
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2014 Jul; 12(7):1119-26. PubMed ID: 24333512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A novel method with significant impact on adenoma detection: combined water-exchange and cap-assisted colonoscopy.
Yen AW; Leung JW; Leung FW
Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Jun; 77(6):944-8. PubMed ID: 23473001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Association of Adenoma and Proximal Sessile Serrated Polyp Detection Rates With Endoscopist Characteristics.
Sarvepalli S; Garber A; Rothberg MB; Mankaney G; McMichael J; Morris-Stiff G; Vargo JJ; Rizk MK; Burke CA
JAMA Surg; 2019 Jul; 154(7):627-635. PubMed ID: 30994911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of endoscopist withdrawal speed on polyp yield: implications for optimal colonoscopy withdrawal time.
Simmons DT; Harewood GC; Baron TH; Petersen BT; Wang KK; Boyd-Enders F; Ott BJ
Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2006 Sep; 24(6):965-71. PubMed ID: 16948808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. High colonoscopic prevalence of proximal colon serrated polyps in average-risk men and women.
Kahi CJ; Li X; Eckert GJ; Rex DK
Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Mar; 75(3):515-20. PubMed ID: 22018551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Differences in detection rates of adenomas and serrated polyps in screening versus surveillance colonoscopies, based on the new hampshire colonoscopy registry.
Anderson JC; Butterly LF; Goodrich M; Robinson CM; Weiss JE
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2013 Oct; 11(10):1308-12. PubMed ID: 23660415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Serrated polyp detection rate during screening colonoscopy.
Liang J; Kalady MF; Appau K; Church J
Colorectal Dis; 2012 Nov; 14(11):1323-7. PubMed ID: 22390284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Efficacy of cap-assisted colonoscopy according to lesion location and endoscopist training level.
Kim DJ; Kim HW; Park SB; Kang DH; Choi CW; Hong JB; Ji BH; Lee CS
World J Gastroenterol; 2015 May; 21(20):6261-70. PubMed ID: 26034361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
