These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24342188)

  • 1. Prediction of carcass composition and individual carcass cuts of Japanese Black steers.
    Maeno H; Oishi K; Mitsuhashi T; Kumagai H; Hirooka H
    Meat Sci; 2014 Mar; 96(3):1365-70. PubMed ID: 24342188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Gluteus medius and rump fat depths as additional live animal ultrasound measurements for predicting retail product and trimmable fat in beef carcasses.
    Realini CE; Williams RE; Pringle TD; Bertrand JK
    J Anim Sci; 2001 Jun; 79(6):1378-85. PubMed ID: 11424672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prediction of retail product and trimmable fat yields from the four primal cuts in beef cattle using ultrasound or carcass data.
    Tait RG; Wilson DE; Rouse GH
    J Anim Sci; 2005 Jun; 83(6):1353-60. PubMed ID: 15890812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of predicting weight and percentage of beef carcass retail product using ultrasound and live animal measures.
    Greiner SP; Rouse GH; Wilson DE; Cundiff LV; Wheeler TL
    J Anim Sci; 2003 Feb; 81(2):466-73. PubMed ID: 12643491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prediction of retail product weight and percentage using ultrasound and carcass measurements in beef cattle.
    Greiner SP; Rouse GH; Wilson DE; Cundiff LV; Wheeler TL
    J Anim Sci; 2003 Jul; 81(7):1736-42. PubMed ID: 12854810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Characterization of biological types of cattle (Cycle VIII): carcass, yield, and longissimus palatability traits.
    Wheeler TL; Cundiff LV; Shackelford SD; Koohmaraie M
    J Anim Sci; 2010 Sep; 88(9):3070-83. PubMed ID: 20453085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computer image analysis for prediction of carcass composition from cross-sections of Japanese Black steers.
    Karnuah AB; Moriya K; Nakanishi N; Nade T; Mitsuhashi T; Sasaki Y
    J Anim Sci; 2001 Nov; 79(11):2851-6. PubMed ID: 11768114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Carcass traits, cut yields, and compositional end points in high-lean-yielding pork carcasses: effects of 10th rib backfat and loin eye area.
    Pringle TD; Williams SE
    J Anim Sci; 2001 Jan; 79(1):115-21. PubMed ID: 11204691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of live and carcass equations predicting percentage of cutability, retail product weight, and trimmable fat in beef cattle.
    Herring WO; Williams SE; Bertrand JK; Benyshek LL; Miller DC
    J Anim Sci; 1994 May; 72(5):1107-18. PubMed ID: 8056655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Relative contributions of subcutaneous and intermuscular fat to yields and predictability of retail product, fat trim, and bone in beef carcasses.
    Dikeman ME; Cundiff LV; Gregory KE; Kemp KE; Koch RM
    J Anim Sci; 1998 Jun; 76(6):1604-12. PubMed ID: 9655580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of transverse and longitudinal real-time ultrasound scans for prediction of lean cut yields and fat-free lean content in live pigs.
    Cisneros F; Ellis M; Miller KD; Novakofski J; Wilson ER; McKeith FK
    J Anim Sci; 1996 Nov; 74(11):2566-76. PubMed ID: 8923171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of winter stocker growth rate and finishing system on: II. Ninth-tenth-eleventh-rib composition, muscle color, and palatability.
    Duckett SK; Neel JP; Sonon RN; Fontenot JP; Clapham WM; Scaglia G
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Oct; 85(10):2691-8. PubMed ID: 17644782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Using current on-line carcass evaluation parameters to estimate boneless and bone-in pork carcass yield as influenced by trim level.
    Berg EP; Grams DW; Miller RK; Wise JW; Forrest JC; Savell JW
    J Anim Sci; 1999 Aug; 77(8):1977-84. PubMed ID: 10461971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dietary zilpaterol hydrochloride. II. Carcass composition and meat palatability of beef cattle.
    Leheska JM; Montgomery JL; Krehbiel CR; Yates DA; Hutcheson JP; Nichols WT; Streeter M; Blanton JR; Miller MF
    J Anim Sci; 2009 Apr; 87(4):1384-93. PubMed ID: 18849379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prediction of physical and chemical body compositions of purebred and crossbred Nellore cattle using the composition of a rib section.
    Marcondes MI; Tedeschi LO; Valadares Filho SC; Chizzotti ML
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Apr; 90(4):1280-90. PubMed ID: 22147483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genetic parameters for image analysis traits on M. longissimus thoracis and M. trapezius of carcass cross section in Japanese Black steers.
    Osawa T; Kuchida K; Hidaka S; Kato T
    J Anim Sci; 2008 Jan; 86(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 17911239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of image analysis of cross-sectional cuts to estimate the composition of the 10th-11th-12th rib-cut of European lean beef bulls.
    Santos R; Peña F; Juárez M; Avilés C; Horcada A; Molina A
    Meat Sci; 2013 Jul; 94(3):312-9. PubMed ID: 23567130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Determining beef carcass retail product and fat yields within 1 hour postmortem.
    Apple JK; Dikeman ME; Cundiff LV; Wise JW
    J Anim Sci; 1991 Dec; 69(12):4845-57. PubMed ID: 1808179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Beef carcass composition of slaughter cattle differing in frame size, muscle score, and external fatness.
    May SG; Mies WL; Edwards JW; Williams FL; Wise JW; Morgan JB; Savell JW; Cross HR
    J Anim Sci; 1992 Aug; 70(8):2431-45. PubMed ID: 1506305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Commercial adaptation of ultrasonography to predict pork carcass composition from live animal and carcass measurements.
    Gresham JD; McPeake SR; Bernard JK; Henderson HH
    J Anim Sci; 1992 Mar; 70(3):631-9. PubMed ID: 1563990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.