These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24343237)

  • 41. [The evaluation of living skills in forensic-psychiatric patients].
    Ross T; Fontao MI; Reed V; Dean A; Doenisch-Seidel U; Pfäfflin F
    Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol; 2007 Jul; 57(7):298-305. PubMed ID: 17334970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Predictive validity of the HCR-20 for violent and non-violent sexual behaviour in a secure mental health service.
    O'Shea LE; Thaker DK; Picchioni MM; Mason FL; Knight C; Dickens GL
    Crim Behav Ment Health; 2016 Dec; 26(5):366-379. PubMed ID: 26095354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. [Evaluation of the HCR-20 Violence Risk Assessment Scheme in a Belgian forensic population].
    Claix A; Pham TH
    Encephale; 2004; 30(5):447-53. PubMed ID: 15627049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Validation of the HCR-20 Scale for Assessing Risk of Violent Behavior in Israeli Psychiatric Inpatients.
    Ivgi D; Bauer A; Khawaled R; Rosca P; Weiss JM; Ponizovsky AM
    Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci; 2015; 52(2):121-7. PubMed ID: 26431417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. [Who is dangerous? Problems of validity and reliability in assessment and documentation of socially aggressive behavior].
    Steinert T; Gebhardt RP
    Psychiatr Prax; 1998 Sep; 25(5):221-6. PubMed ID: 9816600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Routine violence risk assessment in community forensic mental healthcare.
    van den Brink RH; Hooijschuur A; van Os TW; Savenije W; Wiersma D
    Behav Sci Law; 2010; 28(3):396-410. PubMed ID: 19908211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Issues regarding the clinical use of the Classification of Violence Risk (COVR) assessment instrument.
    McCusker PJ
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2007 Dec; 51(6):676-85. PubMed ID: 17615441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Understanding Clinicians' Use of Cues When Assessing the Future Risk of Violence: A Clinical Judgement Analysis in the Psychiatric Setting.
    Brown B; Rakow T
    Clin Psychol Psychother; 2016; 23(2):125-41. PubMed ID: 25652696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Evaluating the HCR-20
    Chen Y; Douglas KS; Zhang Z; Xiao C; Wang H; Wang Y; Ma A
    Behav Sci Law; 2023; 41(4):186-206. PubMed ID: 36893019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Structured assessments for imminent aggression in mental health and correctional settings: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Dickens GL; O'Shea LE; Christensen M
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2020 Apr; 104():103526. PubMed ID: 32062051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The first step in the validation of a new screen for violence risk in acute psychiatry: The inpatient context.
    Hartvig P; Roaldset JO; Moger TA; Ostberg B; Bjørkly S
    Eur Psychiatry; 2011 Mar; 26(2):92-9. PubMed ID: 20456927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Quality of resident violence risk assessments in psychiatric emergency settings.
    Wong L; Morgan A; Wilkie T; Barbaree H
    Can J Psychiatry; 2012 Jun; 57(6):375-80. PubMed ID: 22682575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Predictive validity of dynamic factors: assessing violence risk in forensic psychiatric inpatients.
    Wilson CM; Desmarais SL; Nicholls TL; Hart SD; Brink J
    Law Hum Behav; 2013 Dec; 37(6):377-88. PubMed ID: 23815092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Examining the role of static and dynamic risk factors in the prediction of inpatient violence: variable- and person-focused analyses.
    McDermott BE; Edens JF; Quanbeck CD; Busse D; Scott CL
    Law Hum Behav; 2008 Aug; 32(4):325-38. PubMed ID: 17597388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Predictive validity of the Short-Term Assessment of Risk and Treatability for violent behavior in outpatient forensic psychiatric patients.
    Troquete NA; van den Brink RH; Beintema H; Mulder T; van Os TW; Schoevers RA; Wiersma D
    Psychol Assess; 2015 Jun; 27(2):377-91. PubMed ID: 25496088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The DSM-5 and forensic psychiatry.
    Wortzel HS
    J Psychiatr Pract; 2013 May; 19(3):238-41. PubMed ID: 23653081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The impact of confidence on the accuracy of structured professional and actuarial violence risk judgments in a sample of forensic psychiatric patients.
    Douglas KS; Ogloff JR
    Law Hum Behav; 2003 Dec; 27(6):573-87. PubMed ID: 14724957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Personality traits as predictors of inpatient aggression in a high-security forensic psychiatric setting: prospective evaluation of the PCL-R and IPDE dimension ratings.
    Langton CM; Hogue TE; Daffern M; Mannion A; Howells K
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2011 May; 55(3):392-415. PubMed ID: 20463208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Improving forensic tribunal decisions: the role of the clinician.
    McKee SA; Harris GT; Rice ME
    Behav Sci Law; 2007; 25(4):485-506. PubMed ID: 17620273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Personality disorder and violence: understand violence risk: an introduction to the special section personality disorder and violence.
    Cooke DJ
    J Pers Disord; 2010 Oct; 24(5):539-50. PubMed ID: 20958168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.