These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

395 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24343701)

  • 1. Grading of carotid artery stenosis in the presence of extensive calcifications: dual-energy CT angiography in comparison with contrast-enhanced MR angiography.
    Korn A; Bender B; Brodoefel H; Hauser TK; Danz S; Ernemann U; Thomas C
    Clin Neuroradiol; 2015 Mar; 25(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 24343701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. MR angiography at 3 Tesla to assess proximal internal carotid artery stenoses: contrast-enhanced or 3D time-of-flight MR angiography?
    Weber J; Veith P; Jung B; Ihorst G; Moske-Eick O; Meckel S; Urbach H; Taschner CA
    Clin Neuroradiol; 2015 Mar; 25(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 24384680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Diagnostic accuracy of colour Doppler ultrasonography, CT angiography and blood-pool-enhanced MR angiography in assessing carotid stenosis: a comparative study with DSA in 170 patients.
    Anzidei M; Napoli A; Zaccagna F; Di Paolo P; Saba L; Cavallo Marincola B; Zini C; Cartocci G; Di Mare L; Catalano C; Passariello R
    Radiol Med; 2012 Feb; 117(1):54-71. PubMed ID: 21424318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Modified Dual-Energy Algorithm for Calcified Plaque Removal: Evaluation in Carotid Computed Tomography Angiography and Comparison With Digital Subtraction Angiography.
    Mannil M; Ramachandran J; Vittoria de Martini I; Wegener S; Schmidt B; Flohr T; Krauss B; Valavanis A; Alkadhi H; Winklhofer S
    Invest Radiol; 2017 Nov; 52(11):680-685. PubMed ID: 28542096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Dual-energy CT angiography for evaluation of internal carotid artery stenosis and occlusion].
    Chen Y; Xue HD; Jin ZY; Liu W; Sun H; Wang X; Zhao WM; Wang Y; Mu WB
    Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2009 Apr; 31(2):215-20. PubMed ID: 19507603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dual energy CTA of the carotid bifurcation: advantage of plaque subtraction for assessment of grade of the stenosis and morphology.
    Korn A; Bender B; Thomas C; Danz S; Fenchel M; Nägele T; Heuschmid M; Ernemann U; Hauser TK
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Nov; 80(2):e120-5. PubMed ID: 20833492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Detection of carotid artery stenosis: a comparison between 2 unenhanced MRAs and dual-source CTA.
    Lv P; Lin J; Guo D; Liu H; Tang X; Fu C; Hu J
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2014 Dec; 35(12):2360-5. PubMed ID: 25104291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of carotid artery stenosis with multisection CT and MR imaging: influence of imaging modality and postprocessing.
    Lell M; Fellner C; Baum U; Hothorn T; Steiner R; Lang W; Bautz W; Fellner FA
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2007 Jan; 28(1):104-10. PubMed ID: 17213434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. High-resolution steady state magnetic resonance angiography of the carotid arteries: are intravascular agents necessary?: feasibility and preliminary experience with gadobenate dimeglumine.
    Anzidei M; Napoli A; Marincola BC; Kirchin MA; Neira C; Geiger D; Zaccagna F; Catalano C; Passariello R
    Invest Radiol; 2009 Dec; 44(12):784-92. PubMed ID: 19858728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. MR imaging: influence of imaging technique and postprocessing on measurement of internal carotid artery stenosis.
    Runck F; Steiner RP; Bautz WA; Lell MM
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2008 Oct; 29(9):1736-42. PubMed ID: 18635618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Carotid artery stenosis: contrast-enhanced MR angiography with two different scan times compared with digital subtraction angiography.
    Sundgren PC; Sundén P; Lindgren A; Lanke J; Holtås S; Larsson EM
    Neuroradiology; 2002 Jul; 44(7):592-9. PubMed ID: 12136361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Carotid artery stenosis: prospective comparison of CT, three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR, and conventional angiography.
    Randoux B; Marro B; Koskas F; Duyme M; Sahel M; Zouaoui A; Marsault C
    Radiology; 2001 Jul; 220(1):179-85. PubMed ID: 11425993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Stenosis-occlusion of the carotid bifurcation. Angiography with MR and contrast media versus digital angiography].
    Scarabino T; Carriero A; Balzano S; Sciannelli V; Bonomo L; Salvolini U
    Radiol Med; 1998 Mar; 95(3):170-3. PubMed ID: 9638160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. CT angiographic analysis of carotid artery stenosis: comparison of manual assessment, semiautomatic vessel analysis, and digital subtraction angiography.
    Silvennoinen HM; Ikonen S; Soinne L; Railo M; Valanne L
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2007 Jan; 28(1):97-103. PubMed ID: 17213433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Overestimation of moderate carotid stenosis assessed by both Doppler US and contrast enhanced 3D-MR angiography in the CARMEDAS study.
    Nonent M; Ben Salem D; Serfaty JM; Buthion V; Pasco-Papon A; Rotaru C; Bressollette L; Papon X; Pachai C; Fortrat JO; Gouny P; Badra A; Berge J; Le Bras Y; Cottier JP; Gauvrit JY; Douek P
    J Neuroradiol; 2011 Jul; 38(3):148-55. PubMed ID: 20728218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy and utility of three-dimensional contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in planning carotid stenting.
    Timaran CH; Rosero EB; Valentine RJ; Modrall JG; Smith S; Clagett GP
    J Vasc Surg; 2007 Aug; 46(2):257-63; discussion 263-4. PubMed ID: 17600659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How should we estimate carotid stenosis using magnetic resonance angiography?
    Vanninen RL; Manninen HI; Partanen PK; Tulla H; Vainio PA
    Neuroradiology; 1996 May; 38(4):299-305. PubMed ID: 8738083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography of the carotid artery: comparison with conventional digital subtraction angiography.
    Remonda L; Senn P; Barth A; Arnold M; Lövblad KO; Schroth G
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2002 Feb; 23(2):213-9. PubMed ID: 11847044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MR angiography: Diagnostic performance of four doses for detection and grading of carotid, renal, and aorto-iliac stenoses compared to digital subtraction angiography.
    Schneider G; Ballarati C; Grazioli L; Manfredi R; Thurnher S; Kroencke TJ; Taupitz M; Merlino B; Bonomo L; Shen N; Pirovano G; Kirchin MA; Spinazzi A
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Oct; 26(4):1020-32. PubMed ID: 17896354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prospective evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: elliptic centric contrast-enhanced MR angiography and spiral CT angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography.
    Alvarez-Linera J; Benito-León J; Escribano J; Campollo J; Gesto R
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2003 May; 24(5):1012-9. PubMed ID: 12748115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.