454 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24344621)
1. Impact of inferior glenoid tilt, humeral retroversion, bone grafting, and design parameters on muscle length and deltoid wrapping in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
Roche CP; Diep P; Hamilton M; Crosby LA; Flurin PH; Wright TW; Zuckerman JD; Routman HD
Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013); 2013; 71(4):284-93. PubMed ID: 24344621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Optimizing Deltoid Efficiency with Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Using a Novel Inset Center of Rotation Glenosphere Design.
Roche CP; Hamilton MA; Diep P; Wright TW; Flurin PH; Zuckerman JD; Routman HD
Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013); 2015 Dec; 73 Suppl 1():S37-41. PubMed ID: 26631194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of glenoid component design and humeral component retroversion on internal and external rotation in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a cadaver study.
Berhouet J; Garaud P; Favard L
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2013 Dec; 99(8):887-94. PubMed ID: 24211248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of bone removed with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.
Roche CP; Diep P; Hamilton MA; Flurin PH; Routman HD
Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013); 2013; 71 Suppl 2():S36-40. PubMed ID: 24328578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. How sensitive is the deltoid moment arm to humeral offset changes with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty?
Walker DR; Kinney AL; Wright TW; Banks SA
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2016 Jun; 25(6):998-1004. PubMed ID: 26810015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Design rationale for a posterior/superior offset reverse shoulder prosthesis.
Roche CP; Hamilton MA; Diep P; Flurin PH; Routman HD
Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013); 2013; 71 Suppl 2():S18-24. PubMed ID: 24328575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Implant Design Variations in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Influence the Required Deltoid Force and Resultant Joint Load.
Giles JW; Langohr GD; Johnson JA; Athwal GS
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Nov; 473(11):3615-26. PubMed ID: 26310680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of prosthesis design on muscle length and moment arms in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.
Hamilton MA; Roche CP; Diep P; Flurin PH; Routman HD
Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013); 2013; 71 Suppl 2():S31-5. PubMed ID: 24328577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Prosthesis Design Classification System.
Routman HD; Flurin PH; Wright TW; Zuckerman JD; Hamilton MA; Roche CP
Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013); 2015 Dec; 73 Suppl 1():S5-14. PubMed ID: 26631189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Posterior and inferior glenosphere position in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty supports deltoid efficiency for shoulder flexion and elevation.
Meisterhans M; Bouaicha S; Meyer DC
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2019 Aug; 28(8):1515-1522. PubMed ID: 30929955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Muscle force and excursion requirements and moment arm analysis of a posterior-superior offset reverse total shoulder prosthesis.
Onstot BR; Jacofsky MC; Hansen ML
Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013); 2013; 71 Suppl 2():S25-30. PubMed ID: 24328576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of deltoid tension and humeral version in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a biomechanical study.
Henninger HB; Barg A; Anderson AE; Bachus KN; Tashjian RZ; Burks RT
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2012 Apr; 21(4):483-90. PubMed ID: 21530322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a biomechanical evaluation of humeral and glenosphere hardware configuration.
Tashjian RZ; Burks RT; Zhang Y; Henninger HB
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2015 Mar; 24(3):e68-77. PubMed ID: 25441564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of the humeral tray component positioning for onlay reverse shoulder arthroplasty design: a biomechanical analysis.
Berhouet J; Kontaxis A; Gulotta LV; Craig E; Warren R; Dines J; Dines D
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2015 Apr; 24(4):569-77. PubMed ID: 25457779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of Posterior Wear on Muscle Length with Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty.
Roche CP; Diep P; Hamilton MA; Wright TW; Flurin PH; Zuckerman JD; Routman HD
Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013); 2015 Dec; 73 Suppl 1():S63-7. PubMed ID: 26631199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Grammont reverse prosthesis: design, rationale, and biomechanics.
Boileau P; Watkinson DJ; Hatzidakis AM; Balg F
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2005; 14(1 Suppl S):147S-161S. PubMed ID: 15726075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of humeral component version on impingement in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.
Stephenson DR; Oh JH; McGarry MH; Rick Hatch GF; Lee TQ
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2011 Jun; 20(4):652-8. PubMed ID: 21144775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of implant geometry on range of motion in reverse shoulder arthroplasty assessed using glenohumeral separation distance.
North LR; Hetzler MA; Pickell M; Bryant JT; Deluzio KJ; Bicknell RT
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2015 Sep; 24(9):1359-66. PubMed ID: 25725963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Correlation Between Clinical Outcomes and Anatomic Reconstruction with Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.
Flurin PH; Roche CP; Wright TW; Zuckerman JD
Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013); 2015 Dec; 73 Suppl 1():S92-8. PubMed ID: 26631203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical impact of posterior glenoid wear on anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty.
Roche CP; Diep P; Grey SG; Flurin PH
Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013); 2013; 71 Suppl 2():S5-11. PubMed ID: 24328573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]