These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

324 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24344933)

  • 1. Management patterns of medicare patients undergoing treatment for upper urinary tract calculi.
    Matlaga BR; Meckley LM; Kim M; Byrne TW
    J Endourol; 2014 Jun; 28(6):723-8. PubMed ID: 24344933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy for management of pediatric nephrolithiasis in upper urinary tract stones: multi-institutional outcomes of efficacy and morbidity.
    Marchetti KA; Lee T; Raja N; Corona L; Kraft KH; Wan J; Ellison JS
    J Pediatr Urol; 2019 Oct; 15(5):516.e1-516.e8. PubMed ID: 31326329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy Versus Flexible Ureteroscopy for the Management of Upper Tract Urinary Stones in Children.
    Freton L; Peyronnet B; Arnaud A; Tondut L; Hascoet J; Pradère B; Verhoest G; Habonimana É; Azzis O; Fremond B; Bensalah K
    J Endourol; 2017 Jan; 31(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 27824261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intracorporeal or extracorporeal lithotripsy for distal ureteral calculi? Effect of stone size and multiplicity on success rates.
    Eden CG; Mark IR; Gupta RR; Eastman J; Shrotri NC; Tiptaft RC
    J Endourol; 1998 Aug; 12(4):307-12. PubMed ID: 9726396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. What are the Benefits and Harms of Ureteroscopy Compared with Shock-wave Lithotripsy in the Treatment of Upper Ureteral Stones? A Systematic Review.
    Drake T; Grivas N; Dabestani S; Knoll T; Lam T; Maclennan S; Petrik A; Skolarikos A; Straub M; Tuerk C; Yuan CY; Sarica K
    Eur Urol; 2017 Nov; 72(5):772-786. PubMed ID: 28456350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Treatment for extended-mid and distal ureteral stones: SWL or ureteroscopy? Results of a multicenter study.
    Hendrikx AJ; Strijbos WE; de Knijff DW; Kums JJ; Doesburg WH; Lemmens WA
    J Endourol; 1999 Dec; 13(10):727-33. PubMed ID: 10646679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Matched pair analysis of ureteroscopy vs. shock wave lithotripsy for the treatment of upper ureteric calculi.
    Stewart GD; Bariol SV; Moussa SA; Smith G; Tolley DA
    Int J Clin Pract; 2007 May; 61(5):784-8. PubMed ID: 17386062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of previously failed extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy on ureterorenoscopy outcomes in upper urinary tract stones: a prospective comparative study.
    Ibrahim RM; Mohamed AG; Abdelsattar AF; Elzawy F; Yousef A; Badawy HF; Abdallah M; Sayed O; Elmarakbi A
    World J Urol; 2024 Jul; 42(1):392. PubMed ID: 38985346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of semirigid ureteroscopy, flexible ureteroscopy, and shock wave lithotripsy for initial treatment of 11-20 mm proximal ureteral stones.
    Kartal I; Baylan B; Çakıcı MÇ; Sarı S; Selmi V; Ozdemir H; Yalçınkaya F
    Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2020 Apr; 92(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 32255321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Shock wave lithotripsy versus semirigid ureteroscopy for proximal ureteral calculi (<20 mm): a comparative matched-pair study.
    Youssef RF; El-Nahas AR; El-Assmy AM; El-Tabey NA; El-Hefnawy AS; Eraky I; El-Kenawy MR; El-Kappany HA; Sheir KZ
    Urology; 2009 Jun; 73(6):1184-7. PubMed ID: 19362338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Factors Associated with Regional Adoption of Ureteroscopy in California from 2005 to 2016.
    Wiener SV; Stoller ML; Boscardin J; Suskind AM
    J Endourol; 2019 Jan; 33(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 30458114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Total Surface Area Influences Stone Free Outcomes in Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Distal Ureteral Calculi.
    Scotland KB; Safaee Ardekani G; Chan JYH; Paterson RF; Chew BH
    J Endourol; 2019 Aug; 33(8):661-666. PubMed ID: 30860394
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy compared with ureteroscopy for the removal of small distal ureteral stones.
    Hautmann S; Friedrich MG; Fernandez S; Steuber T; Hammerer P; Braun PM; Jünemann KP; Huland H
    Urol Int; 2004; 73(3):238-43. PubMed ID: 15539843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cost-effectiveness comparison of renal calculi treated with ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy versus shockwave lithotripsy.
    Cone EB; Eisner BH; Ursiny M; Pareek G
    J Endourol; 2014 Jun; 28(6):639-43. PubMed ID: 24444144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Value of early second session shock wave lithotripsy in treatment of upper ureteric stones compared to laser ureteroscopy.
    Abdelbary AM; Al-Dessoukey AA; Moussa AS; Elmarakbi AA; Ragheb AM; Sayed O; Elbatanouny AM; Latif AAE; Lofty AM; Mohamed AG; Salah S; Ibrahim RM
    World J Urol; 2021 Aug; 39(8):3089-3093. PubMed ID: 33471164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of previous SWL on ureterorenoscopy outcomes and optimal timing for ureterorenoscopy after SWL failure in proximal ureteral stones.
    Irer B; Sahin MO; Erbatu O; Yildiz A; Ongun S; Cinar O; Cihan A; Sahin M; Sen V; Ucer O; Kizilay F; Bozkurt O;
    World J Urol; 2020 Mar; 38(3):769-774. PubMed ID: 31098658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Editorial comment for Matlaga et al.
    Chandhoke P
    J Endourol; 2014 Jun; 28(6):728. PubMed ID: 24521178
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A prospective randomized comparison between shockwave lithotripsy and semirigid ureteroscopy for upper ureteral stones <2 cm: a single center experience.
    Kumar A; Nanda B; Kumar N; Kumar R; Vasudeva P; Mohanty NK
    J Endourol; 2015 Jan; 29(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 23914770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ureteroscopy is more cost effective than shock wave lithotripsy for stone treatment: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Geraghty RM; Jones P; Herrmann TRW; Aboumarzouk O; Somani BK
    World J Urol; 2018 Nov; 36(11):1783-1793. PubMed ID: 29730839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cost-effectiveness comparison of ureteral calculi treated with ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy versus shockwave lithotripsy.
    Cone EB; Pareek G; Ursiny M; Eisner B
    World J Urol; 2017 Jan; 35(1):161-166. PubMed ID: 27145788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.