228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24345099)
1. Design and rationale of the AngioSeal versus the Radial approach In acute coronary SyndromE (ARISE) trial: a randomized comparison of a vascular closure device versus the radial approach to prevent vascular access site complications in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome patients.
de Andrade PB; E Mattos LA; Tebet MA; Rinaldi FS; Esteves VC; Nogueira EF; França JÍ; de Andrade MV; Barbosa RA; Labrunie A; Abizaid AA; Sousa AG
Trials; 2013 Dec; 14():435. PubMed ID: 24345099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of a vascular closure device versus the radial approach to reduce access site complications in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome patients: The angio-seal versus the radial approach in acute coronary syndrome trial.
Andrade PB; Mattos LA; Rinaldi FS; Bienert IC; Barbosa RA; Labrunie A; Tebet M; Esteves V; Abizaid A; Sousa AR
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 May; 89(6):976-982. PubMed ID: 27514319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Rationale and design of a randomised clinical trial comparing vascular closure device and manual compression to achieve haemostasis after diagnostic coronary angiography: the Instrumental Sealing of ARterial puncture site - CLOSURE device versus manual compression (ISAR-CLOSURE) trial.
Xhepa E; Byrne RA; Schulz S; Helde S; Gewalt S; Cassese S; Linhardt M; Ibrahim T; Mehilli J; Hoppe K; Grupp K; Kufner S; Böttiger C; Hoppmann P; Burgdorf C; Fusaro M; Ott I; Schneider S; Hengstenberg C; Schunkert H; Laugwitz KL; Kastrati A;
EuroIntervention; 2014 Jun; 10(2):198-203. PubMed ID: 24952057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Access site practice and procedural outcomes in relation to clinical presentation in 439,947 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in the United kingdom.
Ratib K; Mamas MA; Anderson SG; Bhatia G; Routledge H; De Belder M; Ludman PF; Fraser D; Nolan J;
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Jan; 8(1 Pt A):20-9. PubMed ID: 25616814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Transradial versus transfemoral percutaneous coronary intervention in acute coronary syndromes: re-evaluation of the current body of evidence.
Lee MS; Wolfe M; Stone GW
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Nov; 6(11):1149-52. PubMed ID: 24262614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Radial versus femoral access and bivalirudin versus unfractionated heparin in invasively managed patients with acute coronary syndrome (MATRIX): final 1-year results of a multicentre, randomised controlled trial.
Valgimigli M; Frigoli E; Leonardi S; Vranckx P; Rothenbühler M; Tebaldi M; Varbella F; Calabrò P; Garducci S; Rubartelli P; Briguori C; Andó G; Ferrario M; Limbruno U; Garbo R; Sganzerla P; Russo F; Nazzaro M; Lupi A; Cortese B; Ausiello A; Ierna S; Esposito G; Ferrante G; Santarelli A; Sardella G; de Cesare N; Tosi P; van 't Hof A; Omerovic E; Brugaletta S; Windecker S; Heg D; Jüni P;
Lancet; 2018 Sep; 392(10150):835-848. PubMed ID: 30153988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of manual compression and vascular hemostasis devices after coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention through femoral artery access: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Dahal K; Rijal J; Shahukhal R; Sharma S; Watti H; Azrin M; Katikaneni P; Jimenez E; Tandon N; Modi K; Lee J
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2018 Mar; 19(2):151-162. PubMed ID: 28941744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Acute kidney injury after percutaneous coronary intervention: Rationale of the AKI-MATRIX (acute kidney injury-minimizing adverse hemorrhagic events by TRansradial access site and systemic implementation of angioX) sub-study.
Andò G; Cortese B; Frigoli E; Gagnor A; Garducci S; Briguori C; Rubartelli P; Calabrò P; Valgimigli M;
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Nov; 86(5):950-7. PubMed ID: 25854692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Relationship Between Femoral Vascular Closure Devices and Short-Term Mortality From 271 845 Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Procedures Performed in the United Kingdom Between 2006 and 2011: A Propensity Score-Corrected Analysis From the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society.
Farooq V; Goedhart D; Ludman P; de Belder MA; Harcombe A; El-Omar M;
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Jun; 9(6):. PubMed ID: 27225421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of Access Site on Bleeding and Ischemic Events in Patients With Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Treated With Prasugrel: The ACCOAST Access Substudy.
Porto I; Bolognese L; Dudek D; Goldstein P; Hamm C; Tanguay JF; Ten Berg J; Widimský P; Le Gall N; Zagar AJ; LeNarz LA; Miller D; Montalescot G;
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 May; 9(9):897-907. PubMed ID: 27151605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Radial vs Femoral Approach in Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Meta- Analysis of Randomized Trials.
Nardin M; Verdoia M; Barbieri L; Schaffer A; Suryapranata H; De Luca G
Curr Vasc Pharmacol; 2017; 16(1):79-92. PubMed ID: 28490313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Same-day discharge after coronary stenting and femoral artery device closure: A randomized study in stable and low-risk acute coronary syndrome patients.
Clavijo LC; Cortes GA; Jolly A; Tun H; Mehra A; Gaglia MA; Shavelle D; Matthews RV
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2016; 17(3):155-61. PubMed ID: 27157292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of radial versus femoral artery access in patients with acute coronary syndromes with or without ST-segment elevation.
Mehta SR; Jolly SS; Cairns J; Niemela K; Rao SV; Cheema AN; Steg PG; Cantor WJ; Džavík V; Budaj A; Rokoss M; Valentin V; Gao P; Yusuf S;
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2012 Dec; 60(24):2490-9. PubMed ID: 23103036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of arterial access site selection on outcomes in primary percutaneous coronary intervention: are the results of randomized trials achievable in clinical practice?
Mamas MA; Ratib K; Routledge H; Neyses L; Fraser DG; de Belder M; Ludman PF; Nolan J;
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Jul; 6(7):698-706. PubMed ID: 23769648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Vascular access and closure in coronary angiography and percutaneous intervention.
Byrne RA; Cassese S; Linhardt M; Kastrati A
Nat Rev Cardiol; 2013 Jan; 10(1):27-40. PubMed ID: 23183592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A multicenter randomized trial comparing the effectiveness and safety of a novel vascular closure device to manual compression in anticoagulated patients undergoing percutaneous transfemoral procedures: The CELT ACD trial.
Wong SC; Laule M; Turi Z; Sanad W; Crowley J; Degen H; Bennett K; Coleman JE; Bergman G
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Nov; 90(5):756-765. PubMed ID: 28296003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Comparison of radial versus femoral approach for percutaneous coronary intervention in octogenarians with acute coronary syndrome].
Gao L; Liu Y; Xue Q; Tian J; Wang Y
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2014 Jul; 94(26):2025-9. PubMed ID: 25312663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Femoral Access With or Without Vascular Closure Device or Radial Access in Acute Coronary Syndrome.
Gragnano F; Manavifar N; Gargiulo G; Sunnåker M; Galea R; Frigoli E; Calabrò P; Windecker S; Valgimigli M
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Oct; 12(20):2116-2118. PubMed ID: 31648772
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Arterial access-site complications after use of a vascular closure device related to puncture height.
Sartorius B; Behnes M; Ünsal M; Hoffmann U; Lang S; Mashayekhi K; Borggrefe M; Akin I
BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2017 Feb; 17(1):64. PubMed ID: 28209184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Angioseal VIP® vs. StarClose SE® closure devices: a comparative analysis in non-cardiological procedures.
Lucatelli P; Fanelli F; Cannavale A; Corona M; Cirelli C; D'Adamo A; Salvatori FM; Catalano C
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 2017 Feb; 58(1):80-86. PubMed ID: 24309473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
