These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24345099)

  • 1. Design and rationale of the AngioSeal versus the Radial approach In acute coronary SyndromE (ARISE) trial: a randomized comparison of a vascular closure device versus the radial approach to prevent vascular access site complications in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome patients.
    de Andrade PB; E Mattos LA; Tebet MA; Rinaldi FS; Esteves VC; Nogueira EF; França JÍ; de Andrade MV; Barbosa RA; Labrunie A; Abizaid AA; Sousa AG
    Trials; 2013 Dec; 14():435. PubMed ID: 24345099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of a vascular closure device versus the radial approach to reduce access site complications in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome patients: The angio-seal versus the radial approach in acute coronary syndrome trial.
    Andrade PB; Mattos LA; Rinaldi FS; Bienert IC; Barbosa RA; Labrunie A; Tebet M; Esteves V; Abizaid A; Sousa AR
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 May; 89(6):976-982. PubMed ID: 27514319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rationale and design of a randomised clinical trial comparing vascular closure device and manual compression to achieve haemostasis after diagnostic coronary angiography: the Instrumental Sealing of ARterial puncture site - CLOSURE device versus manual compression (ISAR-CLOSURE) trial.
    Xhepa E; Byrne RA; Schulz S; Helde S; Gewalt S; Cassese S; Linhardt M; Ibrahim T; Mehilli J; Hoppe K; Grupp K; Kufner S; Böttiger C; Hoppmann P; Burgdorf C; Fusaro M; Ott I; Schneider S; Hengstenberg C; Schunkert H; Laugwitz KL; Kastrati A;
    EuroIntervention; 2014 Jun; 10(2):198-203. PubMed ID: 24952057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Access site practice and procedural outcomes in relation to clinical presentation in 439,947 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in the United kingdom.
    Ratib K; Mamas MA; Anderson SG; Bhatia G; Routledge H; De Belder M; Ludman PF; Fraser D; Nolan J;
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Jan; 8(1 Pt A):20-9. PubMed ID: 25616814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Transradial versus transfemoral percutaneous coronary intervention in acute coronary syndromes: re-evaluation of the current body of evidence.
    Lee MS; Wolfe M; Stone GW
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Nov; 6(11):1149-52. PubMed ID: 24262614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Radial versus femoral access and bivalirudin versus unfractionated heparin in invasively managed patients with acute coronary syndrome (MATRIX): final 1-year results of a multicentre, randomised controlled trial.
    Valgimigli M; Frigoli E; Leonardi S; Vranckx P; Rothenbühler M; Tebaldi M; Varbella F; Calabrò P; Garducci S; Rubartelli P; Briguori C; Andó G; Ferrario M; Limbruno U; Garbo R; Sganzerla P; Russo F; Nazzaro M; Lupi A; Cortese B; Ausiello A; Ierna S; Esposito G; Ferrante G; Santarelli A; Sardella G; de Cesare N; Tosi P; van 't Hof A; Omerovic E; Brugaletta S; Windecker S; Heg D; Jüni P;
    Lancet; 2018 Sep; 392(10150):835-848. PubMed ID: 30153988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of manual compression and vascular hemostasis devices after coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention through femoral artery access: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Dahal K; Rijal J; Shahukhal R; Sharma S; Watti H; Azrin M; Katikaneni P; Jimenez E; Tandon N; Modi K; Lee J
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2018 Mar; 19(2):151-162. PubMed ID: 28941744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Acute kidney injury after percutaneous coronary intervention: Rationale of the AKI-MATRIX (acute kidney injury-minimizing adverse hemorrhagic events by TRansradial access site and systemic implementation of angioX) sub-study.
    Andò G; Cortese B; Frigoli E; Gagnor A; Garducci S; Briguori C; Rubartelli P; Calabrò P; Valgimigli M;
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Nov; 86(5):950-7. PubMed ID: 25854692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Relationship Between Femoral Vascular Closure Devices and Short-Term Mortality From 271 845 Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Procedures Performed in the United Kingdom Between 2006 and 2011: A Propensity Score-Corrected Analysis From the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society.
    Farooq V; Goedhart D; Ludman P; de Belder MA; Harcombe A; El-Omar M;
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Jun; 9(6):. PubMed ID: 27225421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of Access Site on Bleeding and Ischemic Events in Patients With Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Treated With Prasugrel: The ACCOAST Access Substudy.
    Porto I; Bolognese L; Dudek D; Goldstein P; Hamm C; Tanguay JF; Ten Berg J; Widimský P; Le Gall N; Zagar AJ; LeNarz LA; Miller D; Montalescot G;
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 May; 9(9):897-907. PubMed ID: 27151605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Radial vs Femoral Approach in Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Meta- Analysis of Randomized Trials.
    Nardin M; Verdoia M; Barbieri L; Schaffer A; Suryapranata H; De Luca G
    Curr Vasc Pharmacol; 2017; 16(1):79-92. PubMed ID: 28490313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Same-day discharge after coronary stenting and femoral artery device closure: A randomized study in stable and low-risk acute coronary syndrome patients.
    Clavijo LC; Cortes GA; Jolly A; Tun H; Mehra A; Gaglia MA; Shavelle D; Matthews RV
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2016; 17(3):155-61. PubMed ID: 27157292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of radial versus femoral artery access in patients with acute coronary syndromes with or without ST-segment elevation.
    Mehta SR; Jolly SS; Cairns J; Niemela K; Rao SV; Cheema AN; Steg PG; Cantor WJ; Džavík V; Budaj A; Rokoss M; Valentin V; Gao P; Yusuf S;
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2012 Dec; 60(24):2490-9. PubMed ID: 23103036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of arterial access site selection on outcomes in primary percutaneous coronary intervention: are the results of randomized trials achievable in clinical practice?
    Mamas MA; Ratib K; Routledge H; Neyses L; Fraser DG; de Belder M; Ludman PF; Nolan J;
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Jul; 6(7):698-706. PubMed ID: 23769648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Vascular access and closure in coronary angiography and percutaneous intervention.
    Byrne RA; Cassese S; Linhardt M; Kastrati A
    Nat Rev Cardiol; 2013 Jan; 10(1):27-40. PubMed ID: 23183592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A multicenter randomized trial comparing the effectiveness and safety of a novel vascular closure device to manual compression in anticoagulated patients undergoing percutaneous transfemoral procedures: The CELT ACD trial.
    Wong SC; Laule M; Turi Z; Sanad W; Crowley J; Degen H; Bennett K; Coleman JE; Bergman G
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Nov; 90(5):756-765. PubMed ID: 28296003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Comparison of radial versus femoral approach for percutaneous coronary intervention in octogenarians with acute coronary syndrome].
    Gao L; Liu Y; Xue Q; Tian J; Wang Y
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2014 Jul; 94(26):2025-9. PubMed ID: 25312663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Femoral Access With or Without Vascular Closure Device or Radial Access in Acute Coronary Syndrome.
    Gragnano F; Manavifar N; Gargiulo G; Sunnåker M; Galea R; Frigoli E; Calabrò P; Windecker S; Valgimigli M
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Oct; 12(20):2116-2118. PubMed ID: 31648772
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Arterial access-site complications after use of a vascular closure device related to puncture height.
    Sartorius B; Behnes M; Ünsal M; Hoffmann U; Lang S; Mashayekhi K; Borggrefe M; Akin I
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2017 Feb; 17(1):64. PubMed ID: 28209184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Angioseal VIP® vs. StarClose SE® closure devices: a comparative analysis in non-cardiological procedures.
    Lucatelli P; Fanelli F; Cannavale A; Corona M; Cirelli C; D'Adamo A; Salvatori FM; Catalano C
    J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 2017 Feb; 58(1):80-86. PubMed ID: 24309473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.