735 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24345980)
1. Hip resurfacing arthroplasty versus large-diameter head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: comparison of three designs from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register.
Junnila M; Kostensalo I; Virolainen P; Remes V; Matilainen M; Vahlberg T; Pulkkinen P; Eskelinen A; Itälä A; Mäkelä K
Scand J Surg; 2014 Mar; 103(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 24345980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cementless total hip arthroplasty with large diameter metal-on-metal heads: short-term survivorship of 8059 hips from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register.
Mokka J; Mäkelä KT; Virolainen P; Remes V; Pulkkinen P; Eskelinen A
Scand J Surg; 2013; 102(2):117-23. PubMed ID: 23820688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intraoperative Complications and Mid-Term Follow-Up of Large-Diameter Head Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty and Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty.
Miettinen SSA; Mäkinen TJ; Mäkelä K; Huhtala H; Kettunen JS; Remes V
Scand J Surg; 2018 Jun; 107(2):180-186. PubMed ID: 29333941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Poor 10-year survivorship of hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
Seppänen M; Karvonen M; Virolainen P; Remes V; Pulkkinen P; Eskelinen A; Liukas A; Mäkelä KT
Acta Orthop; 2016 Dec; 87(6):554-559. PubMed ID: 27759474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. High Revision Rate for Large-head Metal-on-metal THA at a Mean of 7.1 Years: A Registry Study.
Seppänen M; Laaksonen I; Pulkkinen P; Eskelinen A; Puhto AP; Kettunen J; Leskinen J; Manninen M; Mäkelä K
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Jun; 476(6):1223-1230. PubMed ID: 29480891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Five-year results of the ASR XL Acetabular System and the ASR Hip Resurfacing System: an analysis from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
de Steiger RN; Hang JR; Miller LN; Graves SE; Davidson DC
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Dec; 93(24):2287-93. PubMed ID: 22258775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Are Females at Greater Risk for Revision Surgery After Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty With the Articular Surface Replacement Prosthesis?
Donahue GS; Lindgren V; Galea VP; Madanat R; Muratoglu O; Malchau H
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Oct; 474(10):2257-65. PubMed ID: 27121872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Independent predictors of revision following metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: a retrospective cohort study using National Joint Registry data.
Jameson SS; Baker PN; Mason J; Porter ML; Deehan DJ; Reed MR
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Jun; 94(6):746-54. PubMed ID: 22628587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Large diameter metal on metal articulations. Comparison of total hip arthroplasty and hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
Jack CM; Walter WL; Shimmin AJ; Cashman K; de Steiger RN
J Arthroplasty; 2013 Apr; 28(4):650-3. PubMed ID: 23140992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. What Is the Rerevision Rate After Revising a Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty? Analysis From the AOANJRR.
Wong JM; Liu YL; Graves S; de Steiger R
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Nov; 473(11):3458-64. PubMed ID: 25721576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Is the Survivorship of Birmingham Hip Resurfacing Better Than Selected Conventional Hip Arthroplasties in Men Younger Than 65 Years of Age? A Study from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
Stoney J; Graves SE; de Steiger RN; Rainbird S; Kelly TL; Hatton A
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Nov; 478(11):2625-2636. PubMed ID: 32898048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Three metal-on-metal hip replacement devices from the same manufacturer--a short- to mid-term survival.
Kostensalo I; Junnila M; Mokka J; Virolainen P; Vahlberg T; Mäkelä KT
Acta Orthop Belg; 2014 Jun; 80(2):222-7. PubMed ID: 25090796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The mean ten-year results of metal-on-metal hybrid hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
Amstutz HC; Le Duff MJ
Bone Joint J; 2018 Nov; 100-B(11):1424-1433. PubMed ID: 30418058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Effectiveness of Blood Metal Ions in Identifying Patients with Unilateral Birmingham Hip Resurfacing and Corail-Pinnacle Metal-on-Metal Hip Implants at Risk of Adverse Reactions to Metal Debris.
Matharu GS; Berryman F; Brash L; Pynsent PB; Treacy RB; Dunlop DJ
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Apr; 98(8):617-26. PubMed ID: 27098320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Midterm results with Birmingham Hip Resurfacing/Synergy stem modular metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty.
Hosny HA; Srinivasan SC; Keenan J; Fekry H
Acta Orthop Belg; 2013 Aug; 79(4):386-91. PubMed ID: 24205767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Hip resurfacing arthroplasty: short-term survivorship of 4,401 hips from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register.
Seppänen M; Mäkelä K; Virolainen P; Remes V; Pulkkinen P; Eskelinen A
Acta Orthop; 2012 Jun; 83(3):207-13. PubMed ID: 22616745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing compared with 28-mm diameter metal-on-metal total hip replacement: a randomised study with six to nine years' follow-up.
Vendittoli PA; Rivière C; Roy AG; Barry J; Lusignan D; Lavigne M
Bone Joint J; 2013 Nov; 95-B(11):1464-73. PubMed ID: 24151264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Failure rates of metal-on-metal hip resurfacings: analysis of data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales.
Smith AJ; Dieppe P; Howard PW; Blom AW;
Lancet; 2012 Nov; 380(9855):1759-66. PubMed ID: 23036895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hip resurfacing arthroplasty in young patients: international high-volume centres' report on the outcome of 11,382 metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasties in patients ⩽50 years at surgery.
Van Der Straeten C;
Hip Int; 2022 May; 32(3):353-362. PubMed ID: 32905713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Outcomes of different bearings in total hip arthroplasty - implant survival, revision causes, and patient-reported outcome.
Varnum C
Dan Med J; 2017 Mar; 64(3):. PubMed ID: 28260601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
