192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24346175)
1. Driving with hemianopia: III. Detection of stationary and approaching pedestrians in a simulator.
Alberti CF; Peli E; Bowers AR
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 Jan; 55(1):368-74. PubMed ID: 24346175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Driving with hemianopia, I: Detection performance in a driving simulator.
Bowers AR; Mandel AJ; Goldstein RB; Peli E
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Nov; 50(11):5137-47. PubMed ID: 19608541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Driving with Hemianopia V: Do Individuals with Hemianopia Spontaneously Adapt Their Gaze Scanning to Differing Hazard Detection Demands?
Alberti CF; Goldstein RB; Peli E; Bowers AR
Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2017 Sep; 6(5):11. PubMed ID: 29067219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Driving with hemianopia: IV. Head scanning and detection at intersections in a simulator.
Bowers AR; Ananyev E; Mandel AJ; Goldstein RB; Peli E
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 Mar; 55(3):1540-8. PubMed ID: 24474265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Driving with central field loss I: effect of central scotomas on responses to hazards.
Bronstad PM; Bowers AR; Albu A; Goldstein R; Peli E
JAMA Ophthalmol; 2013 Mar; 131(3):303-9. PubMed ID: 23329309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Driving with Central Visual Field Loss II: How Scotomas above or below the Preferred Retinal Locus (PRL) Affect Hazard Detection in a Driving Simulator.
Bronstad PM; Albu A; Bowers AR; Goldstein R; Peli E
PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0136517. PubMed ID: 26332315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Driving with hemianopia, II: lane position and steering in a driving simulator.
Bowers AR; Mandel AJ; Goldstein RB; Peli E
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2010 Dec; 51(12):6605-13. PubMed ID: 20671269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Effects of Age, Distraction, and Simulated Central Vision Impairment on Hazard Detection in a Driving Simulator.
Zhang CT; Bowers AR; Savage SW
Optom Vis Sci; 2020 Apr; 97(4):239-248. PubMed ID: 32304533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Auditory Reminder Cues to Promote Proactive Scanning on Approach to Intersections in Drivers With Homonymous Hemianopia: Driving With Hemianopia, IX.
Xu J; Emmermann B; Bowers AR
JAMA Ophthalmol; 2022 Jan; 140(1):75-78. PubMed ID: 34817569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Young drivers' perception of adult and child pedestrians in potential street-crossing situations.
Ābele L; Haustein S; Møller M
Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Sep; 118():263-268. PubMed ID: 29625692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Field Expansion with Multiplexing Prism Glasses Improves Pedestrian Detection for Acquired Monocular Vision.
Jung JH; Castle R; Kurukuti NM; Manda S; Peli E
Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2020 Jul; 9(8):35. PubMed ID: 32855881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Seeing pedestrians at night: effect of driver age and visual abilities.
Wood JM; Lacherez P; Tyrrell RA
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2014 Jul; 34(4):452-8. PubMed ID: 24888897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Driving With Hemianopia X: Effects of Cross Traffic on Gaze Behaviors and Pedestrian Responses at Intersections.
Xu J; Baliutaviciute V; Swan G; Bowers AR
Front Hum Neurosci; 2022; 16():938140. PubMed ID: 35898933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Peripheral prism glasses: effects of moving and stationary backgrounds.
Shen J; Peli E; Bowers AR
Optom Vis Sci; 2015 Apr; 92(4):412-20. PubMed ID: 25785533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Driving With Hemianopia VI: Peripheral Prisms and Perceptual-Motor Training Improve Detection in a Driving Simulator.
Houston KE; Peli E; Goldstein RB; Bowers AR
Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2018 Jan; 7(1):5. PubMed ID: 29359111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Agreement of driving simulator and on-road driving performance in patients with binocular visual field loss.
Ungewiss J; Kübler T; Sippel K; Aehling K; Heister M; Rosenstiel W; Kasneci E; Papageorgiou E;
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2018 Dec; 256(12):2429-2435. PubMed ID: 30251198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Route familiarity breeds inattention: a driving simulator study.
Yanko MR; Spalek TM
Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Aug; 57():80-6. PubMed ID: 23643937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of driver compensatory behaviour on risks of critical pedestrian collisions under simulated visual field defects.
Lee J; Itoh M
PLoS One; 2020; 15(4):e0231130. PubMed ID: 32271822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Collision avoidance in persons with homonymous visual field defects under virtual reality conditions.
Papageorgiou E; Hardiess G; Ackermann H; Wiethoelter H; Dietz K; Mallot HA; Schiefer U
Vision Res; 2012 Jan; 52(1):20-30. PubMed ID: 22100816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Car driving performance in hemianopia: an on-road driving study.
de Haan GA; Melis-Dankers BJ; Brouwer WH; Bredewoud RA; Tucha O; Heutink J
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 Sep; 55(10):6482-9. PubMed ID: 25212777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
