These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24346272)

  • 1. Private primary care physicians' perspectives on factors affecting the adoption of electronic medical records: a qualitative pre-implementation study.
    Or C; Wong K; Tong E; Sek A
    Work; 2014; 48(4):529-38. PubMed ID: 24346272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Exploring Factors Affecting Voluntary Adoption of Electronic Medical Records Among Physicians and Clinical Assistants of Small or Solo Private General Practice Clinics.
    Or C; Tong E; Tan J; Chan S
    J Med Syst; 2018 May; 42(7):121. PubMed ID: 29845400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Beyond the focus group: understanding physicians' barriers to electronic medical records.
    Yan H; Gardner R; Baier R
    Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf; 2012 Apr; 38(4):184-91. PubMed ID: 22533131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Barriers to organizational adoption of EMR systems in family physician practices: a mixed-methods study in Canada.
    Paré G; Raymond L; de Guinea AO; Poba-Nzaou P; Trudel MC; Marsan J; Micheneau T
    Int J Med Inform; 2014 Aug; 83(8):548-58. PubMed ID: 24969270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Physician user satisfaction with an electronic medical records system in primary healthcare centres in Al Ain: a qualitative study.
    Al Alawi S; Al Dhaheri A; Al Baloushi D; Al Dhaheri M; Prinsloo EA
    BMJ Open; 2014 Nov; 4(11):e005569. PubMed ID: 25377010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effects of organizational contextual factors on physicians' attitude toward adoption of Electronic Medical Records.
    Abdekhoda M; Ahmadi M; Gohari M; Noruzi A
    J Biomed Inform; 2015 Feb; 53():174-9. PubMed ID: 25445481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Primary health care teams' experience of electronic medical record use after adoption.
    Denomme LB; Terry AL; Brown JB; Thind A; Stewart M
    Fam Med; 2011 Oct; 43(9):638-42. PubMed ID: 22002775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Adoption of electronic medical records in family practice: the providers' perspective.
    Terry AL; Giles G; Brown JB; Thind A; Stewart M
    Fam Med; 2009; 41(7):508-12. PubMed ID: 19582637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Computers in the examination room and the electronic health record: physicians' perceived impact on clinical encounters before and after full installation and implementation.
    Doyle RJ; Wang N; Anthony D; Borkan J; Shield RR; Goldman RE
    Fam Pract; 2012 Oct; 29(5):601-8. PubMed ID: 22379185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The adoption of electronic medical record by physicians: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review.
    Dutta B; Hwang HG
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Feb; 99(8):e19290. PubMed ID: 32080145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. No paper, but the same routines: a qualitative exploration of experiences in two Norwegian hospitals deprived of the paper based medical record.
    Lium JT; Tjora A; Faxvaag A
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2008 Jan; 8():2. PubMed ID: 18186935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ceiling effect in EMR system assimilation: a multiple case study in primary care family practices.
    Trudel MC; Marsan J; Paré G; Raymond L; Ortiz de Guinea A; Maillet É; Micheneau T
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2017 Apr; 17(1):46. PubMed ID: 28427405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Primary care physicians' attitudes to the adoption of electronic medical records: a systematic review and evidence synthesis using the clinical adoption framework.
    O'Donnell A; Kaner E; Shaw C; Haighton C
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2018 Nov; 18(1):101. PubMed ID: 30424758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A case study evaluation of a Critical Care Information System adoption using the socio-technical and fit approach.
    Yusof MM
    Int J Med Inform; 2015 Jul; 84(7):486-99. PubMed ID: 25881560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Consumer Opinions of Health Information Exchange, e-Prescribing, and Personal Health Records.
    Cochran GL; Lander L; Morien M; Lomelin DE; Brittin J; Reker C; Klepser DG
    Perspect Health Inf Manag; 2015; 12(Fall):1e. PubMed ID: 26604874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Are privacy-enhancing technologies for genomic data ready for the clinic? A survey of medical experts of the Swiss HIV Cohort Study.
    Raisaro JL; McLaren PJ; Fellay J; Cavassini M; Klersy C; Hubaux JP;
    J Biomed Inform; 2018 Mar; 79():1-6. PubMed ID: 29331453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Implementation of an electronic medical record system in previously computer-naïve primary care centres: a pilot study from Cyprus.
    Samoutis G; Soteriades ES; Kounalakis DK; Zachariadou T; Philalithis A; Lionis C
    Inform Prim Care; 2007; 15(4):207-16. PubMed ID: 18237477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of computer use on physician-patient communication using interviews: A patient perspective.
    Antoun J; Hamadeh G; Romani M
    Int J Med Inform; 2019 May; 125():91-95. PubMed ID: 30914186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Feasibility of extracting data from electronic medical records for research: an international comparative study.
    van Velthoven MH; Mastellos N; Majeed A; O'Donoghue J; Car J
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2016 Jul; 16():90. PubMed ID: 27411943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Market factors and electronic medical record adoption in medical practices.
    Menachemi N; Mazurenko O; Kazley AS; Diana ML; Ford EW
    Health Care Manage Rev; 2012; 37(1):14-22. PubMed ID: 22016180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.