219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24346673)
1. The challenge of assessing the impact of science beyond bibliometrics.
Barreto ML
Rev Saude Publica; 2013 Aug; 47(4):834-7. PubMed ID: 24346673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Impact factor, its variants and its influence in academic promotion].
Puche RC
Medicina (B Aires); 2011; 71(5):484-9. PubMed ID: 22057180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Differences between h-index measures from different bibliographic sources and search engines.
Barreto ML; Aragão E; Sousa LE; Santana TM; Barata RB
Rev Saude Publica; 2013 Apr; 47(2):231-8. PubMed ID: 24037349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Measuring the validity of early health technology assessment: bibliometrics as a tool to indicate its scientific basis.
Lundberg J; Brommels M; Skår J; Tomson G
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2008; 24(1):70-5. PubMed ID: 18218171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Why are there few publications by the Argentine gastroenterology? Considerations on a bibliometric analysis of Argentine publications on gastroenterology].
Barreyro FJ; Krabshuis J; Planzer del Campo M; Bai JC
Acta Gastroenterol Latinoam; 2009 Mar; 39(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 19408733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Productivity of CNPq Researchers from Different Fields in Biomedical Sciences: The Need for Objective Bibliometric Parameters-A Report from Brazil.
Kamdem JP; Roos DH; Sanmi AA; Calabró L; Abolaji AO; de Oliveira CS; Barros LM; Duarte AE; Barbosa NV; Souza DO; Rocha JBT
Sci Eng Ethics; 2019 Aug; 25(4):1037-1055. PubMed ID: 29404974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessing prevention research impact: a bibliometric analysis.
Franks AL; Simoes EJ; Singh R; Sajor Gray B
Am J Prev Med; 2006 Mar; 30(3):211-6. PubMed ID: 16476636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of the Brazilian scientific publications on the recent scientific developments in cardiology.
Bacal F
Arq Bras Cardiol; 2009 Dec; 93(6):538-40, 581-3. PubMed ID: 20379628
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. H-index in the Brazilian Academy of Sciences: comments and concerns.
Kellner AW; Ponciano LC
An Acad Bras Cienc; 2008 Dec; 80(4):771-81. PubMed ID: 19039498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Analysis of the technical-scientific production of the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) productivity fellows in Pediatrics.
Klepa TC; Pedroso B
Einstein (Sao Paulo); 2020; 18():eAO5043. PubMed ID: 31859786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Determining scientific impact using a collaboration index.
Stallings J; Vance E; Yang J; Vannier MW; Liang J; Pang L; Dai L; Ye I; Wang G
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2013 Jun; 110(24):9680-5. PubMed ID: 23720314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Bibliometric indexes of the editions, publishing the articles on the problems of morphology, and some bibliometric parameters of the authors of morphological publications].
Shevliuk NN
Morfologiia; 2013; 144(4):14-8. PubMed ID: 24592695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Biomedical publications in Spain on debate (I): state of neurological journals].
González de Dios J; Sempere AP; Aleixandre-Benavent R
Rev Neurol; 2007 Jan 1-15; 44(1):32-42. PubMed ID: 17199227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Confusing the confused: thoughts on impact factor, h(irsch) index, Q value, and other cofactors that influence the researcher's happiness].
Quindós G
Rev Iberoam Micol; 2009 Jun; 26(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 19631157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Use of various bibliometric methods in operative evaluation of research activities of the research institutions of medico- biological profile].
Karas' GA; Lazarev VS
Vestn Akad Med Nauk SSSR; 1991; (4):61-5. PubMed ID: 1866991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [High quality of research supported by the Netherlands Heart Foundation ('Nederlandse Hartstichting')].
van der Velde A; van Leeuwen T; van Welie S; Stam H; Klaassen A
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2010; 154():A803. PubMed ID: 20170565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Automated grading of research performance clearly fails to measure up.
Haeffner-Cavaillon N; Graillot-Gak C; Bréchot C
Nature; 2005 Dec; 438(7068):559. PubMed ID: 16319861
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Critical assessment of progress of medical sciences in Iran and Turkey: the way developing countries with limited resources should make effective contributions to the production of science.
Massarrat S; Kolahdoozan S
Arch Iran Med; 2011 Nov; 14(6):370-7. PubMed ID: 22039839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The counting house.
Adam D
Nature; 2002 Feb; 415(6873):726-9. PubMed ID: 11845174
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Measures of experience and scientometrics to evaluate the impact of scientific production.
Akerman M
Rev Saude Publica; 2013 Aug; 47(4):824-8. PubMed ID: 24346671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
