292 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24346843)
1. Costs analysis of laparoendoscopic, single-site laparoscopic and open surgery for cT1 renal masses in a European high-volume centre.
Pini G; Ascalone L; Greco F; Mohammed N; Fornara P
World J Urol; 2014 Dec; 32(6):1501-10. PubMed ID: 24346843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Single-center comparison of purely laparoscopic, hand-assisted laparoscopic, and open radical nephrectomy in patients at high anesthetic risk.
Baldwin DD; Dunbar JA; Parekh DJ; Wells N; Shuford MD; Cookson MS; Smith JA; Herrell SD; Chang SS; McDougall EM
J Endourol; 2003 Apr; 17(3):161-7. PubMed ID: 12803988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The relationship of postoperative complications with in-hospital outcomes and costs after renal surgery for kidney cancer.
Kim SP; Leibovich BC; Shah ND; Weight CJ; Borah BJ; Han LC; Boorjian SA; Thompson RH
BJU Int; 2013 Apr; 111(4):580-8. PubMed ID: 22564425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Outcome of laparoscopic radical and open partial nephrectomy for the sporadic 4 cm. or less renal tumor with a normal contralateral kidney.
Matin SF; Gill IS; Worley S; Novick AC
J Urol; 2002 Oct; 168(4 Pt 1):1356-9; discussion 1359-60. PubMed ID: 12352392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of laparoendoscopic single-site and multiport laparoscopic radical and partial nephrectomy: a prospective, nonrandomized study.
Bazzi WM; Stroup SP; Kopp RP; Cohen SA; Sakamoto K; Derweesh IH
Urology; 2012 Nov; 80(5):1039-45. PubMed ID: 22990064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [THE FACTORS THAT AFFECT THE DECISION TO PERFORM LAPAROSCOPIC PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY FOR SMALL RENAL TUMOR].
Kanno T; Kubota M; Sakamoto H; Nishiyama R; Oida T; Okada T; Akao T; Higashi Y; Kawamura J; Yamada H
Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi; 2016; 107(2):73-78. PubMed ID: 28442673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy: a matched-pair comparison of 200 patients.
Marszalek M; Meixl H; Polajnar M; Rauchenwald M; Jeschke K; Madersbacher S
Eur Urol; 2009 May; 55(5):1171-8. PubMed ID: 19232819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative financial analysis of minimally invasive surgery to open surgery for small renal tumours < or =3.5 cm: a single institutional experience.
Mouraviev V; Nosnik I; Robertson C; Albala D; Walther P; Polascik TJ
Eur Urol; 2007 Mar; 51(3):715-20; discussion 720-1. PubMed ID: 16904255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy Versus Radical Nephrectomy for Clinical T1 Renal Hilar Tumor: Comparison of Perioperative Characteristics and Short-Term Functional and Oncologic Outcomes.
Yang C; Wang Z; Huang S; Xue L; Fu D; Chong T
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2018 Oct; 28(10):1183-1187. PubMed ID: 29668402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Laparoendoscopic single-site versus conventional laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal cell cancer in patients with increased comorbidities and previous abdominal surgery: preliminary results of a single-centre retrospective study.
Springer C; Inferrera A; Kawan F; Schumann A; Fornara P; Greco F
World J Urol; 2013 Feb; 31(1):213-8. PubMed ID: 23242034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Toward greater adoption of minimally invasive and nephron-sparing surgical techniques for renal cell cancer in the United States.
Banegas MP; Harlan LC; Mann B; Yabroff KR
Urol Oncol; 2016 Oct; 34(10):433.e9-433.e17. PubMed ID: 27321355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy vs laparoscopic or open partial nephrectomy for T1 renal cell carcinoma: comparison of complication rates in elderly patients during the initial phase of adoption.
Becker A; Ravi P; Roghmann F; Trinh QD; Tian Z; Larouche A; Kim S; Shariat SF; Kluth L; Dahlem R; Fisch M; Graefen M; Eichelberg C; Karakiewicz PI; Sun M
Urology; 2014 Jun; 83(6):1285-91. PubMed ID: 24862392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the complications and the cost of open and laparoscopic radical nephrectomy in renal tumors larger than 7 centimeters.
Bayrak O; Seckiner I; Erturhan S; Cil G; Erbagci A; Yagci F
Urol J; 2014 Mar; 11(1):1222-7. PubMed ID: 24595928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of Partial and Radical Laparascopic Nephrectomy: Perioperative and Oncologic Outcomes for Clinical T2 Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Rinott Mizrahi G; Freifeld Y; Klein I; Boyarsky L; Zreik R; Orlin I; Friedman B; Stein A; Yoram D
J Endourol; 2018 Oct; 32(10):950-954. PubMed ID: 30039718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The operative safety and oncological outcomes of laparoscopic nephrectomy for T3 renal cell cancer.
Stewart GD; Ang WJ; Laird A; Tolley DA; Riddick AC; McNeill SA
BJU Int; 2012 Sep; 110(6):884-90. PubMed ID: 22289017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost comparison of nephron-sparing treatments for cT1a renal masses.
Castle SM; Gorbatiy V; Avallone MA; Eldefrawy A; Caulton DE; Leveillee RJ
Urol Oncol; 2013 Oct; 31(7):1327-32. PubMed ID: 22361086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A critical analysis of the actual role of minimally invasive surgery and active surveillance for kidney cancer.
Heuer R; Gill IS; Guazzoni G; Kirkali Z; Marberger M; Richie JP; de la Rosette JJ
Eur Urol; 2010 Feb; 57(2):223-32. PubMed ID: 19853989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative effectiveness, costs and trends in treatment of small renal masses from 2005 to 2007.
Kowalczyk KJ; Choueiri TK; Hevelone ND; Trinh QD; Lipsitz SR; Nguyen PL; Lynch JH; Hu JC
BJU Int; 2013 Aug; 112(4):E273-80. PubMed ID: 23452093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A Multicentered, Propensity Matched Analysis Comparing Laparoscopic and Open Surgery for pT3a Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Patel P; Nayak JG; Liu Z; Saarela O; Jewett M; Rendon R; Kapoor A; Black P; Tanguay S; Kawakami J; Moore R; Breau RH; Morash C; Pouliot F; Drachenberg DE
J Endourol; 2017 Jul; 31(7):645-650. PubMed ID: 28381117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy provides better operative outcomes as compared to the laparoscopic and open approaches: results from a prospective cohort study.
Luciani LG; Chiodini S; Mattevi D; Cai T; Puglisi M; Mantovani W; Malossini G
J Robot Surg; 2017 Sep; 11(3):333-339. PubMed ID: 28000016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
