These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24347295)

  • 21. Comparative DIGE Proteomics.
    Ohlendieck K
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1664():17-24. PubMed ID: 29019121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Establishment of two-dimensional differential gel electrophoresis using cerebrospinal fluid from neurocysticercosis patients].
    Li JY; Tian XJ; Huang Y; Yang YJ; Ma QR; Xue YP
    Zhongguo Ji Sheng Chong Xue Yu Ji Sheng Chong Bing Za Zhi; 2008 Jun; 26(3):174-8. PubMed ID: 19160961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Two-dimensional fluorescence difference gel electrophoresis for comparative proteomics profiling.
    Tannu NS; Hemby SE
    Nat Protoc; 2006; 1(4):1732-42. PubMed ID: 17487156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Quantitative proteomics for two-dimensional gels using difference gel electrophoresis.
    Friedman DB
    Methods Mol Biol; 2007; 367():219-39. PubMed ID: 17185779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Coomassie staining provides routine (sub)femtomole in-gel detection of intact proteoforms: Expanding opportunities for genuine Top-down Proteomics.
    Noaman N; Abbineni PS; Withers M; Coorssen JR
    Electrophoresis; 2017 Dec; 38(24):3086-3099. PubMed ID: 28872692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparative proteomics and difference gel electrophoresis.
    Minden J
    Biotechniques; 2007 Dec; 43(6):739, 741, 743 passim. PubMed ID: 18251249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effect of CyDye minimum labeling in differential gel electrophoresis on the reliability of protein identification.
    Hrebicek T; Dürrschmid K; Auer N; Bayer K; Rizzi A
    Electrophoresis; 2007 Apr; 28(7):1161-9. PubMed ID: 17340647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Analysis of DIGE data using a linear mixed model allowing for protein-specific dye effects.
    Krogh M; Liu Y; Waldemarson S; Valastro B; James P
    Proteomics; 2007 Dec; 7(23):4235-44. PubMed ID: 17979174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Two-Dimensional Difference Gel Electrophoresis.
    Blundon M; Ganesan V; Redler B; Van PT; Minden JS
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 1855():229-247. PubMed ID: 30426421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A thousand points of light: the application of fluorescence detection technologies to two-dimensional gel electrophoresis and proteomics.
    Patton WF
    Electrophoresis; 2000 Apr; 21(6):1123-44. PubMed ID: 10786886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Analysis of protein changes using two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis.
    Gao W
    Methods Mol Biol; 2014; 1105():17-30. PubMed ID: 24623216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Differential Proteome Analysis Using 2D-DIGE.
    May C; Brosseron F; Chartowski P; Fuchs K; Meyer HE; Sitek B; Marcus K
    Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2228():77-84. PubMed ID: 33950485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of three commercially available DIGE analysis software packages: minimal user intervention in gel-based proteomics.
    Kang Y; Techanukul T; Mantalaris A; Nagy JM
    J Proteome Res; 2009 Feb; 8(2):1077-84. PubMed ID: 19133722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Immobilization of the first dimension in 2D blue native/SDS-PAGE allows the relative quantification of membrane proteomes.
    Klepsch M; Schlegel S; Wickström D; Friso G; van Wijk KJ; Persson JO; de Gier JW; Wagner S
    Methods; 2008 Oct; 46(2):48-53. PubMed ID: 18674622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. High-resolution 2DE.
    Marcus K; Joppich C; May C; Pfeiffer K; Sitek B; Meyer H; Stuehler K
    Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 519():221-40. PubMed ID: 19381586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Application of fluorescence difference gel electrophoresis technology in searching for protein biomarkers in chick myopia.
    Lam TC; Li KK; Lo SC; Guggenheim JA; To CH
    J Proteome Res; 2007 Nov; 6(11):4135-49. PubMed ID: 17924678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of SYPRO Ruby and Flamingo fluorescent stains for application in proteomic research.
    Chakravarti B; Fathy P; Sindicich M; Mallik B; Chakravarti DN
    Anal Biochem; 2010 Mar; 398(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 19917264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Assessing detection methods for gel-based proteomic analyses.
    Harris LR; Churchward MA; Butt RH; Coorssen JR
    J Proteome Res; 2007 Apr; 6(4):1418-25. PubMed ID: 17367184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Fully automated two-dimensional electrophoresis system for high-throughput protein analysis.
    Hiratsuka A; Yokoyama K
    Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 577():155-66. PubMed ID: 19718515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Improving 2D-DIGE protein expression analysis by two-stage linear mixed models: assessing experimental effects in a melanoma cell study.
    Fernández EA; Girotti MR; López del Olmo JA; Llera AS; Podhajcer OL; Cantet RJ; Balzarini M
    Bioinformatics; 2008 Dec; 24(23):2706-12. PubMed ID: 18818217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.