459 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24347632)
1. Large-scale quality analysis of published ChIP-seq data.
Marinov GK; Kundaje A; Park PJ; Wold BJ
G3 (Bethesda); 2014 Feb; 4(2):209-23. PubMed ID: 24347632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. ChiLin: a comprehensive ChIP-seq and DNase-seq quality control and analysis pipeline.
Qin Q; Mei S; Wu Q; Sun H; Li L; Taing L; Chen S; Li F; Liu T; Zang C; Xu H; Chen Y; Meyer CA; Zhang Y; Brown M; Long HW; Liu XS
BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Oct; 17(1):404. PubMed ID: 27716038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Data exploration, quality control and statistical analysis of ChIP-exo/nexus experiments.
Welch R; Chung D; Grass J; Landick R; Keles S
Nucleic Acids Res; 2017 Sep; 45(15):e145. PubMed ID: 28911122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Statistical Analysis and Quality Assessment of ChIP-seq Data with DROMPA.
Nakato R; Shirahige K
Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1672():631-643. PubMed ID: 29043652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A quality control system for profiles obtained by ChIP sequencing.
Mendoza-Parra MA; Van Gool W; Mohamed Saleem MA; Ceschin DG; Gronemeyer H
Nucleic Acids Res; 2013 Nov; 41(21):e196. PubMed ID: 24038469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Chromatin Immunoprecipitation and High-Throughput Sequencing (ChIP-Seq): Tips and Tricks Regarding the Laboratory Protocol and Initial Downstream Data Analysis.
Patten DK; Corleone G; Magnani L
Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1767():271-288. PubMed ID: 29524141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In Vivo ChIP-Seq of Nuclear Receptors: A Rough Guide to Transform Frozen Tissues into High-Confidence Genome-Wide Binding Profiles.
Mir AA; Dyar KA; Greulich F; Quagliarini F; Jouffe C; Hubert MJ; Hemmer MC; Uhlenhaut NH
Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 1966():39-70. PubMed ID: 31041738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Greenscreen: A simple method to remove artifactual signals and enrich for true peaks in genomic datasets including ChIP-seq data.
Klasfeld S; Roulé T; Wagner D
Plant Cell; 2022 Nov; 34(12):4795-4815. PubMed ID: 36124976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. ChIP-seq guidelines and practices of the ENCODE and modENCODE consortia.
Landt SG; Marinov GK; Kundaje A; Kheradpour P; Pauli F; Batzoglou S; Bernstein BE; Bickel P; Brown JB; Cayting P; Chen Y; DeSalvo G; Epstein C; Fisher-Aylor KI; Euskirchen G; Gerstein M; Gertz J; Hartemink AJ; Hoffman MM; Iyer VR; Jung YL; Karmakar S; Kellis M; Kharchenko PV; Li Q; Liu T; Liu XS; Ma L; Milosavljevic A; Myers RM; Park PJ; Pazin MJ; Perry MD; Raha D; Reddy TE; Rozowsky J; Shoresh N; Sidow A; Slattery M; Stamatoyannopoulos JA; Tolstorukov MY; White KP; Xi S; Farnham PJ; Lieb JD; Wold BJ; Snyder M
Genome Res; 2012 Sep; 22(9):1813-31. PubMed ID: 22955991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Practical guidelines for the comprehensive analysis of ChIP-seq data.
Bailey T; Krajewski P; Ladunga I; Lefebvre C; Li Q; Liu T; Madrigal P; Taslim C; Zhang J
PLoS Comput Biol; 2013; 9(11):e1003326. PubMed ID: 24244136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Considerations on Experimental Design and Data Analysis of Chromatin Immunoprecipitation Experiments.
Jordán-Pla A; Visa N
Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1689():9-28. PubMed ID: 29027161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Population size estimation for quality control of ChIP-Seq datasets.
Kolmykov SK; Kondrakhin YV; Yevshin IS; Sharipov RN; Ryabova AS; Kolpakov FA
PLoS One; 2019; 14(8):e0221760. PubMed ID: 31465497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of sheared chromatin length on ChIP-seq quality and sensitivity.
Keller CA; Wixom AQ; Heuston EF; Giardine B; Hsiung CC; Long MR; Miller A; Anderson SM; Cockburn A; Blobel GA; Bodine DM; Hardison RC
G3 (Bethesda); 2021 Jun; 11(6):. PubMed ID: 33788948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Statistical Analysis in ChIP-seq-Related Applications.
Teng M
Methods Mol Biol; 2023; 2629():169-181. PubMed ID: 36929078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. NGS-QC Generator: A Quality Control System for ChIP-Seq and Related Deep Sequencing-Generated Datasets.
Mendoza-Parra MA; Saleem MA; Blum M; Cholley PE; Gronemeyer H
Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1418():243-65. PubMed ID: 27008019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Peak identification for ChIP-seq data with no controls.
Zhang YF; Su B
Dongwuxue Yanjiu; 2012 Dec; 33(E5-6):E121-8. PubMed ID: 23266983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Limitations and possibilities of low cell number ChIP-seq.
Gilfillan GD; Hughes T; Sheng Y; Hjorthaug HS; Straub T; Gervin K; Harris JR; Undlien DE; Lyle R
BMC Genomics; 2012 Nov; 13():645. PubMed ID: 23171294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Active promoters give rise to false positive 'Phantom Peaks' in ChIP-seq experiments.
Jain D; Baldi S; Zabel A; Straub T; Becker PB
Nucleic Acids Res; 2015 Aug; 43(14):6959-68. PubMed ID: 26117547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19.
Zeng J; Li G
Int J Biol Sci; 2018; 14(12):1724-1731. PubMed ID: 30416387
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Unified Analysis of Multiple ChIP-Seq Datasets.
Ma G; Babarinde IA; Zhuang Q; Hutchins AP
Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2198():451-465. PubMed ID: 32822050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
