146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24347669)
1. Parasitoid infestation changes female mating preferences.
Beckers OM; Wagner WE
Anim Behav; 2013 Apr; 85(4):. PubMed ID: 24347669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The relative importance of different direct benefits in the mate choices of a field cricket.
Wagner WE; Basolo AL
Evolution; 2007 Mar; 61(3):617-22. PubMed ID: 17348924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Female field crickets incur increased parasitism risk when near preferred song.
Martin CM; Wagner WE
PLoS One; 2010 Mar; 5(3):e9592. PubMed ID: 20231888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Female life span and fertility are increased by the ejaculates of preferred males.
Wagner WE; Harper CJ
Evolution; 2003 Sep; 57(9):2054-66. PubMed ID: 14575327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Eavesdropping parasitoids do not cause the evolution of less conspicuous signalling behaviour in a field cricket.
Beckers OM; Wagner WE
Anim Behav; 2012 Dec; 84(6):1457-1462. PubMed ID: 23888083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. CALLING SONGS OF FIELD CRICKETS (TELEOGRYLLUS OCEANICUS) WITH AND WITHOUT PHONOTACTIC PARASITOID INFECTION.
Zuk M; Rotenberry JT; Simmons LW
Evolution; 1998 Feb; 52(1):166-171. PubMed ID: 28568142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The importance of calling song and courtship song in female mate choice in the variable field cricket.
Wagner WE; Reiser MG
Anim Behav; 2000 Jun; 59(6):1219-1226. PubMed ID: 10877901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Behavioral responses of a parasitoid fly to rapidly evolving host signals.
Broder ED; Gallagher JH; Wikle AW; Venable CP; Zonana DM; Ingley SJ; Smith TC; Tinghitella RM
Ecol Evol; 2022 Aug; 12(8):e9193. PubMed ID: 35979522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Signaler-receiver-eavesdropper: Risks and rewards of variation in the dominant frequency of male cricket calls.
Dobbs OL; Talavera JB; Rossi SM; Menjivar S; Gray DA
Ecol Evol; 2020 Nov; 10(21):12364-12371. PubMed ID: 33209294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Geographic variation in female preference functions and male songs of the field cricket Teleogryllus oceanicus.
Simmons LW; Zuk M; Rotenberry JT
Evolution; 2001 Jul; 55(7):1386-94. PubMed ID: 11525462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Females can solve the problem of low signal reliability by assessing multiple male traits.
Wegehaupt AK; Wagner WE
Biol Lett; 2017 Sep; 13(9):. PubMed ID: 28904180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Tradeoffs limit the evolution of male traits that are attractive to females.
Wagner WE; Beckers OM; Tolle AE; Basolo AL
Proc Biol Sci; 2012 Jul; 279(1739):2899-906. PubMed ID: 22456890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Steppengrille (Gryllus spec./assimilis): selective filters and signal mismatch on two time scales.
Rothbart MM; Hennig RM
PLoS One; 2012; 7(9):e43975. PubMed ID: 22970154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mate choice in adult female Bengalese finches: females express consistent preferences for individual males and prefer female-directed song performances.
Dunning JL; Pant S; Bass A; Coburn Z; Prather JF
PLoS One; 2014; 9(2):e89438. PubMed ID: 24558501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Nutritional effects on male calling behaviour in the variable field cricket.
Wagner WE; Hoback WW
Anim Behav; 1999 Jan; 57(1):89-95. PubMed ID: 10053075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The cost of assuming the life history of a host: acoustic startle in the parasitoid fly Ormia ochracea.
Rosen MJ; Levin EC; Hoy RR
J Exp Biol; 2009 Dec; 212(Pt 24):4056-64. PubMed ID: 19946084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Divergence in male cricket song and female preference functions in three allopatric sister species.
Hennig RM; Blankers T; Gray DA
J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2016 May; 202(5):347-60. PubMed ID: 27026021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Molecular biogeography and host relations of a parasitoid fly.
Gray DA; Kunerth HD; Zuk M; Cade WH; Balenger SL
Ecol Evol; 2019 Oct; 9(19):11476-11493. PubMed ID: 31641487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reproductive isolation in the acoustically divergent groups of tettigoniid, Mecopoda elongata.
Dutta R; Tregenza T; Balakrishnan R
PLoS One; 2017; 12(11):e0188843. PubMed ID: 29182676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A novel cricket morph has diverged in song and wing morphology across island populations.
Gallagher JH; Zonana DM; Broder ED; Syammach AM; Tinghitella RM
J Evol Biol; 2023 Nov; 36(11):1609-1617. PubMed ID: 37885146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
