BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24347895)

  • 1. In vitro evaluation of the effect of two finishing and polishing systems on four esthetic restorative materials.
    Rai R; Gupta R
    J Conserv Dent; 2013 Nov; 16(6):564-7. PubMed ID: 24347895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of Surface Roughness, Hardness, and Gloss of Composites After Three Different Finishing and Polishing Techniques: An In Vitro Study.
    Nithya K; Sridevi K; Keerthi V; Ravishankar P
    Cureus; 2020 Feb; 12(2):e7037. PubMed ID: 32211270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Surface roughness of packable composite resins polished with various systems.
    Borges AB; Marsilio AL; Pagani C; Rodrigues JR
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2004; 16(1):42-7; discussion 48. PubMed ID: 15259542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of composite resin materials.
    Attar N
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Jan; 8(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 17211502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of the Effect of Surface Polishing, Oral Beverages and Food Colorants on Color Stability and Surface Roughness of Nanocomposite Resins.
    Kumari RV; Nagaraj H; Siddaraju K; Poluri RK
    J Int Oral Health; 2015 Jul; 7(7):63-70. PubMed ID: 26229373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of finishing and polishing procedures on surface roughness of tooth-colored materials.
    Celik C; Ozgünaltay G
    Quintessence Int; 2009 Oct; 40(9):783-9. PubMed ID: 19862405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of different finishing and polishing systems on the surface roughness of different composite restorative materials.
    Uçtaşli MB; Arisu HD; Omürlü H; Eligüzeloğlu E; Ozcan S; Ergun G
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Feb; 8(2):89-96. PubMed ID: 17277831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of finishing/polishing techniques and time on surface roughness of esthetic restorative materials.
    Madhyastha PS; Hegde S; Srikant N; Kotian R; Iyer SS
    Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2017; 14(5):326-330. PubMed ID: 29109747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of finishing technique on the microleakage and surface texture of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials.
    Wilder AD; Swift EJ; May KN; Thompson JY; McDougal RA
    J Dent; 2000 Jul; 28(5):367-73. PubMed ID: 10785304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Surface Roughness in Nanoparticle Resin Composites Subjected to Two Polishing Systems: An
    Ramírez-Vargas GG; Ladera-Castañeda MI; López-Gurreonero C; Cornejo-Pinto A; Cachay-Criado H; Cervantes-Ganoza LA; Cayo-Rojas CF
    J Int Soc Prev Community Dent; 2023; 13(2):114-123. PubMed ID: 37223443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of Different Finishing and Polishing Systems on the Surface Roughness of Resin Composite and Enamel: An
    Bansal K; Gupta S; Nikhil V; Jaiswal S; Jain A; Aggarwal N
    Int J Appl Basic Med Res; 2019; 9(3):154-158. PubMed ID: 31392178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of a glaze/composite sealant on the 3-D surface roughness of esthetic restorative materials.
    Perez Cdos R; Hirata RJ; da Silva AH; Sampaio EM; de Miranda MS
    Oper Dent; 2009; 34(6):674-80. PubMed ID: 19953776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of Different Polishing Systems on the Surface Roughness and Gloss of Novel Nanohybrid Resin Composites.
    Soliman HAN; Elkholany NR; Hamama HH; El-Sharkawy FM; Mahmoud SH; Comisi JC
    Eur J Dent; 2021 May; 15(2):259-265. PubMed ID: 33111284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of toothbrushing on surface characteristics of microhybrid and nanofilled resin composites following different finishing and polishing procedures.
    Daud A; Adams AJ; Shawkat A; Gray G; Wilson NHF; Lynch CD; Blum IR
    J Dent; 2020 Aug; 99():103376. PubMed ID: 32470566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Surface roughness of new microhybrid resin-based composites.
    Gedik R; Hürmüzlü F; Coşkun A; Bektaş OO; Ozdemir AK
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2005 Aug; 136(8):1106-12. PubMed ID: 16161365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Surface roughness of light-activated glass-ionomer cement restorative materials after finishing.
    St Germain HA; Meiers JC
    Oper Dent; 1996; 21(3):103-9. PubMed ID: 9002869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Three-dimensional evaluation of surface roughness of resin composites after finishing and polishing.
    Nair VS; Sainudeen S; Padmanabhan P; Vijayashankar LV; Sujathan U; Pillai R
    J Conserv Dent; 2016; 19(1):91-5. PubMed ID: 26957802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of one-step polishing system on the surface roughness of three esthetic resin composite materials.
    Türkün LS; Türkün M
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(2):203-11. PubMed ID: 15088733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of one-step and multi-step polishing systems on surface texture of two different resin composites.
    Bashetty K; Joshi S
    J Conserv Dent; 2010 Jan; 13(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 20582217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of four different finishing and polishing systems on resin composites: roughness surface and gloss retention evaluations.
    Tosco V; Monterubbianesi R; Orilisi G; Procaccini M; Grandini S; Putignano A; Orsini G
    Minerva Stomatol; 2020 Aug; 69(4):207-214. PubMed ID: 31633320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.