These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24348006)

  • 1. Beliefs and expectancies in legal decision making: an introduction to the Special Issue.
    McAuliff BD; Bornstein BH
    Psychol Crime Law; 2012; 18(1):. PubMed ID: 24348006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Do Jurors Get What They Expect? Traditional versus Alternative Forms of Children's Testimony.
    McAuliff BD; Kovera MB
    Psychol Crime Law; 2012 Jan; 18(1):27-47. PubMed ID: 22523466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hearsay versus children's testimony: Effects of truthful and deceptive statements on jurors' decisions.
    Goodman GS; Myers JE; Qin J; Quas JA; Castelli P; Redlich AD; Rogers L
    Law Hum Behav; 2006 Jun; 30(3):363-401. PubMed ID: 16779675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Eyewitness testimony: tracing the beliefs of Swedish legal professionals.
    Granhag PA; Strömwall LA; Hartwig M
    Behav Sci Law; 2005; 23(5):709-27. PubMed ID: 16170786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mock Jurors' Perceptions of Sexual Assault on a University Campus.
    Pica E; Sheahan CL; Pozzulo J
    J Interpers Violence; 2021 May; 36(9-10):NP5447-NP5465. PubMed ID: 30239260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Who Is the Rotten Apple? Mock Jurors' Views of Teacher-Student Sexual Contact.
    Anderson A; Wingrove T; Fox P; McLean K; Styer E
    J Interpers Violence; 2018 May; 33(9):1449-1471. PubMed ID: 26621035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. "But He's a Star Football Player!": How Social Status Influences Mock Jurors' Perceptions in a Sexual Assault Case.
    Pica E; Sheahan C; Pozzulo J
    J Interpers Violence; 2020 Oct; 35(19-20):3963-3985. PubMed ID: 29294785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Interactive Effects of Race and Expert Testimony on Jurors' Perceptions of Recanted Confessions.
    Ewanation L; Maeder EM
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():699077. PubMed ID: 34539496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Judges' experiences with mitigating jurors' implicit biases.
    Kirshenbaum JM; Miller MK
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2021; 28(5):683-693. PubMed ID: 35571599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Judges' views of child sexual abuse: evaluating beliefs against research findings in a Finnish sample.
    Korkman J; Svanbäck J; Finnilä K; Santtila P
    Scand J Psychol; 2014 Oct; 55(5):497-504. PubMed ID: 25040839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Norwegian judges' knowledge of factors affecting eyewitness testimony: a 12-year follow-up.
    Bjørndal LD; McGill L; Magnussen S; Richardson S; Saraiva R; Stadel M; Brennen T
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2021; 28(5):665-682. PubMed ID: 35571598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Explaining gender differences in jurors' reactions to child sexual assault cases.
    Bottoms BL; Peter-Hagene LC; Stevenson MC; Wiley TR; Mitchell TS; Goodman GS
    Behav Sci Law; 2014; 32(6):789-812. PubMed ID: 25430669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Crime Scene Familiarity: Does it Influence Mock Jurors' Decisions?
    Pica E; Pozzulo J
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2017; 24(5):745-759. PubMed ID: 31983986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Can the effectiveness of eyewitness expert testimony be improved?
    Wise RA; Kehn A
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2020; 27(2):315-330. PubMed ID: 32944129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Secondary confessions: the influence (or lack thereof) of incentive size and scientific expert testimony on jurors' perceptions of informant testimony.
    Maeder EM; Pica E
    Law Hum Behav; 2014 Dec; 38(6):560-8. PubMed ID: 25180762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Judges', lay judges', and police officers' beliefs about factors affecting children's testimony about sexual abuse.
    Leander L; Christianson SA; Svedin CG; Granhag PA
    J Psychol; 2007 Jul; 141(4):341-57. PubMed ID: 17725070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of defendant sexual orientation on jurors' perceptions of child sexual assault.
    Wiley TR; Bottoms BL
    Law Hum Behav; 2009 Feb; 33(1):46-60. PubMed ID: 18404363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Face-to-face confrontation: effects of closed-circuit technology on children's eyewitness testimony and jurors' decisions.
    Goodman GS; Tobey AE; Batterman-Faunce JM; Orcutt H; Thomas S; Shapiro C; Sachsenmaier T
    Law Hum Behav; 1998 Apr; 22(2):165-203. PubMed ID: 9566121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Jurors' and Judges' Evaluation of Defendants with Autism and the Impact on Sentencing: A Systematic Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) Review of Autism Spectrum Disorder in the Courtroom.
    Allely CS; Cooper P
    J Law Med; 2017 Nov; 25(1):105-123. PubMed ID: 29978627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Timing of eyewitness expert testimony, jurors' need for cognition, and case strength as determinants of trial verdicts.
    Leippe MR; Eisenstadt D; Rauch SM; Seib HM
    J Appl Psychol; 2004 Jun; 89(3):524-41. PubMed ID: 15161410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.